树脂杂化陶瓷材料与氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷的颜色稳定性比较。

Q3 Dentistry Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-10-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v20i37.13742
Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani, Elaheh Beyabanaki, Mahshid Razmgah, Alma Salazar, Marta Revilla-León, Amirali Zandinejad
{"title":"树脂杂化陶瓷材料与氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷的颜色稳定性比较。","authors":"Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani,&nbsp;Elaheh Beyabanaki,&nbsp;Mahshid Razmgah,&nbsp;Alma Salazar,&nbsp;Marta Revilla-León,&nbsp;Amirali Zandinejad","doi":"10.18502/fid.v20i37.13742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This in vitro study aimed to compare the effect of external staining agents (black tea and grape juice) on the color change of three hybrid ceramics including a new material in comparison to zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Ten samples of two hybrid dental ceramics including Vita Enamic (Vita Zahnfabrik) and Crystal Ultra (Digital Dental) in addition to a resin nanoceramic, Lava Ultimate (3M ESPE); and a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic, Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik) were prepared and immersed in black tea or grape juice for 30 days. A spectrophotometer was used to evaluate color change. All samples were carefully chosen in A3 shades or their equivalent. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used to analyze the color differences (ΔE00) among the materials and the staining solutions at a significant level of 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Significant color changes were observed in Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate groups after immersion in both solutions (P<0.001). The least color changes (ΔE00) belonged to the Vita Suprinity (1.34) and Crystal Ultra (1.92) groups, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> The color changes of Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate materials were beyond clinical acceptability. However, the mean color changes of Vita Suprinity and Crystal Ultra groups were clinically acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"20 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/59/55/FID-20-37.PMC10591022.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Color Stability of Resin Hybrid Ceramic Materials in Comparison to Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic.\",\"authors\":\"Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani,&nbsp;Elaheh Beyabanaki,&nbsp;Mahshid Razmgah,&nbsp;Alma Salazar,&nbsp;Marta Revilla-León,&nbsp;Amirali Zandinejad\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/fid.v20i37.13742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This in vitro study aimed to compare the effect of external staining agents (black tea and grape juice) on the color change of three hybrid ceramics including a new material in comparison to zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Ten samples of two hybrid dental ceramics including Vita Enamic (Vita Zahnfabrik) and Crystal Ultra (Digital Dental) in addition to a resin nanoceramic, Lava Ultimate (3M ESPE); and a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic, Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik) were prepared and immersed in black tea or grape juice for 30 days. A spectrophotometer was used to evaluate color change. All samples were carefully chosen in A3 shades or their equivalent. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used to analyze the color differences (ΔE00) among the materials and the staining solutions at a significant level of 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Significant color changes were observed in Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate groups after immersion in both solutions (P<0.001). The least color changes (ΔE00) belonged to the Vita Suprinity (1.34) and Crystal Ultra (1.92) groups, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> The color changes of Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate materials were beyond clinical acceptability. However, the mean color changes of Vita Suprinity and Crystal Ultra groups were clinically acceptable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/59/55/FID-20-37.PMC10591022.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v20i37.13742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v20i37.13742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本体外研究旨在比较外部染色剂(红茶和葡萄汁)与氧化锆增强硅酸锂相比,对包括一种新材料在内的三种杂化陶瓷颜色变化的影响。材料和方法:两种混合牙科陶瓷的十个样品,包括Vita Enamic(Vita Zahnfabrik)和Crystal Ultra(Digital dental),以及树脂纳米陶瓷Lava Ultimate(3M ESPE);和氧化锆增强的硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷Vita Suprinity(Vita Zahnfabrik),并在红茶或葡萄汁中浸泡30天。使用分光光度计来评估颜色变化。所有样品都是经过仔细挑选的A3色调或同等色调。使用双向ANOVA和Bonferroni检验来分析材料和染色溶液之间的色差(ΔE00),其显著水平为0.05。结果:Vita-Enamic组和Lava Ultimate组在浸泡两种溶液后均观察到显著的颜色变化(P结论:Vita Enamic和Lava Ultimate材料的颜色变化超出了临床可接受范围,但Vita-Suprinity和Crystal Ultra组的平均颜色变化在临床可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Color Stability of Resin Hybrid Ceramic Materials in Comparison to Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic.

Objectives: This in vitro study aimed to compare the effect of external staining agents (black tea and grape juice) on the color change of three hybrid ceramics including a new material in comparison to zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate. Materials and Methods: Ten samples of two hybrid dental ceramics including Vita Enamic (Vita Zahnfabrik) and Crystal Ultra (Digital Dental) in addition to a resin nanoceramic, Lava Ultimate (3M ESPE); and a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic, Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik) were prepared and immersed in black tea or grape juice for 30 days. A spectrophotometer was used to evaluate color change. All samples were carefully chosen in A3 shades or their equivalent. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used to analyze the color differences (ΔE00) among the materials and the staining solutions at a significant level of 0.05. Results: Significant color changes were observed in Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate groups after immersion in both solutions (P<0.001). The least color changes (ΔE00) belonged to the Vita Suprinity (1.34) and Crystal Ultra (1.92) groups, respectively. Conclusion: The color changes of Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate materials were beyond clinical acceptability. However, the mean color changes of Vita Suprinity and Crystal Ultra groups were clinically acceptable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anxiolytic Effect of Jasmine Aromatherapy in Pediatric Dental Procedures: A Single-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Smoking Cessation Counseling: Practices, Determinants, and Barriers in a Sample of Iranian Primary Care Dentists. Fracture Resistance, Surface Roughness, and Microtensile Bond Strength of Monolithic Zirconia to Resin Cements after Plasma Treatment. The Effect of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Dentin. In Vitro Effects of Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol Polishing Systems on Composite Resin Surface Roughness after Aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1