护士被诊断为癌症后工作经验的范围回顾。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Oncology nursing forum Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1188/23.ONF.714-724
Kai-Lin You, Meredith H Cummings, Catherine M Bender, Laura A Fennimore, Margaret Q Rosenzweig, Andrew M Dierkes, Ketki D Raina, Teresa Hagan Thomas
{"title":"护士被诊断为癌症后工作经验的范围回顾。","authors":"Kai-Lin You, Meredith H Cummings, Catherine M Bender, Laura A Fennimore, Margaret Q Rosenzweig, Andrew M Dierkes, Ketki D Raina, Teresa Hagan Thomas","doi":"10.1188/23.ONF.714-724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem identification: </strong>To map key concepts underpinning work-related studies about nurses with cancer and identify knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Literature review: </strong>A search was conducted in the PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases for articles about nurses with cancer and work-related topics published through March 2023.</p><p><strong>Data evaluation: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist was used to report results, and the JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of studies. Eleven articles were included.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>The following four critical concepts were identified: role adjustments at work, cancer impacts on work, organizational support, and translating insights gained from cancer experience into work. Research gaps identified by the scoping review were a lack of theoretical or conceptual frameworks, lack of syntheses of main ideas, and lack of clear data about participants' socioeconomic status across studies.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>Minimal research exists to map predictors, outcomes, or intervention targets to guide organizational strategies to support nurses' retention in the nursing workforce. A guiding framework, recruitment of diverse nurses, and focus on the four critical concepts identified in this scoping review are suggested for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"50 6","pages":"714-724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review on Work Experiences of Nurses After Being Diagnosed With Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Kai-Lin You, Meredith H Cummings, Catherine M Bender, Laura A Fennimore, Margaret Q Rosenzweig, Andrew M Dierkes, Ketki D Raina, Teresa Hagan Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1188/23.ONF.714-724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Problem identification: </strong>To map key concepts underpinning work-related studies about nurses with cancer and identify knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Literature review: </strong>A search was conducted in the PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases for articles about nurses with cancer and work-related topics published through March 2023.</p><p><strong>Data evaluation: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist was used to report results, and the JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of studies. Eleven articles were included.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>The following four critical concepts were identified: role adjustments at work, cancer impacts on work, organizational support, and translating insights gained from cancer experience into work. Research gaps identified by the scoping review were a lack of theoretical or conceptual frameworks, lack of syntheses of main ideas, and lack of clear data about participants' socioeconomic status across studies.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>Minimal research exists to map predictors, outcomes, or intervention targets to guide organizational strategies to support nurses' retention in the nursing workforce. A guiding framework, recruitment of diverse nurses, and focus on the four critical concepts identified in this scoping review are suggested for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"714-724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.714-724\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.714-724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题识别:绘制癌症护士工作相关研究的关键概念,并确定知识差距。文献综述:在PubMed®、CINAHL®和PsycINFO®数据库中搜索截至2023年3月发表的关于癌症护士和与工作相关主题的文章。数据评估:系统评价的首选报告项目和范围界定评价的Meta-Analyses扩展检查表用于报告结果,JBI关键评估工具用于评估研究质量。收录了11篇文章。综合:确定了以下四个关键概念:工作中的角色调整、癌症对工作的影响、组织支持以及将从癌症经验中获得的见解转化为工作。范围界定审查发现的研究差距是缺乏理论或概念框架,缺乏主要思想的综合,以及缺乏关于参与者在研究中的社会经济地位的明确数据。研究意义:很少有研究绘制预测因素、结果或干预目标,以指导组织策略,支持护士在护理队伍中的保留。为未来的研究提出了一个指导框架,招聘不同的护士,并重点关注本范围审查中确定的四个关键概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Scoping Review on Work Experiences of Nurses After Being Diagnosed With Cancer.

Problem identification: To map key concepts underpinning work-related studies about nurses with cancer and identify knowledge gaps.

Literature review: A search was conducted in the PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases for articles about nurses with cancer and work-related topics published through March 2023.

Data evaluation: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist was used to report results, and the JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of studies. Eleven articles were included.

Synthesis: The following four critical concepts were identified: role adjustments at work, cancer impacts on work, organizational support, and translating insights gained from cancer experience into work. Research gaps identified by the scoping review were a lack of theoretical or conceptual frameworks, lack of syntheses of main ideas, and lack of clear data about participants' socioeconomic status across studies.

Implications for research: Minimal research exists to map predictors, outcomes, or intervention targets to guide organizational strategies to support nurses' retention in the nursing workforce. A guiding framework, recruitment of diverse nurses, and focus on the four critical concepts identified in this scoping review are suggested for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology nursing forum
Oncology nursing forum 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership. Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care. Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Surveillance Mammography Adherence in Korean Breast Cancer Survivors. Build Bridges, Not Walls: A Call for Collaboration in Oncology With PhD and DNP Colleagues to Improve Research. Expectancy Effect of Acupuncture on Cancer-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Exploring Caregiver Burden and Related Factors Among Primary Caregivers of Patients With Cancer in Taiwan. Feasibility Study of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Treatment-Related Sequelae, and Inflammatory Markers in Breast Cancer Survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1