2019-2021年安大略省精神病住院服务:2019冠状病毒病限制前、限制和限制后期间入院、诊断和敏锐度的横断面比较

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-10-24 Print Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220158
Elke Ham, N Zoe Hilton, Jennifer Crawford, Soyeon Kim
{"title":"2019-2021年安大略省精神病住院服务:2019冠状病毒病限制前、限制和限制后期间入院、诊断和敏锐度的横断面比较","authors":"Elke Ham,&nbsp;N Zoe Hilton,&nbsp;Jennifer Crawford,&nbsp;Soyeon Kim","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased mental health problems in the general population, yet psychiatric hospital admissions decreased. Early evidence suggested that psychiatric admissions normalized within weeks; we sought to examine the longer-lasting impacts on the psychiatric inpatient population beyond this initial period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission data for patients admitted to 8 psychiatric hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 3 time periods - before restrictions were imposed (June 22, 2019, to Mar. 16, 2020), during restrictions (Mar. 17 to June 21, 2020) and after restrictions were lifted (June 22, 2020, to Mar. 16, 2021) for changes in involuntary status, diagnoses and clinical presentation using descriptive analysis. For clinical presentation, we extracted scores on 4 Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health symptom scales (Depressive Severity Index, Cognitive Performance Scale, Positive Symptoms Scale-Long Version and Social Withdrawal Scale), and 2 behaviour scales (Aggressive Behavior Scale and Violence Sum).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cross-sectional sample of 9848 patients was included in the analysis. The mean number of daily admissions decreased 19% from 16.4 (standard deviation [SD] 8.0) before the restriction period to 13.3 (SD 6.1) during the restriction period, and was still 6% below prerestriction levels after restrictions were lifted 15.4 (SD 6.8), with standard error difference of 1.03 (95% confidence interval -0.22 to 2.29). From the pre- to the postrestriction periods, the proportion of involuntary patients increased by 6 percentage points, and the proportions of patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder or personality disorder increased by 4 percentage points and 1 percentage point, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Psychiatric admissions did not fully return to prerestriction levels in absolute rates and patient acuity after COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. Psychiatric services must prepare to appraise and respond to any increased acuity through interventions for patients, workforce planning and mental health support for staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/1e/cmajo.20220158.PMC10609896.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychiatric inpatient services in Ontario, 2019-2021: a cross-sectional comparison of admissions, diagnoses and acuity during the COVID-19 prerestriction, restriction and postrestriction periods.\",\"authors\":\"Elke Ham,&nbsp;N Zoe Hilton,&nbsp;Jennifer Crawford,&nbsp;Soyeon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.9778/cmajo.20220158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased mental health problems in the general population, yet psychiatric hospital admissions decreased. Early evidence suggested that psychiatric admissions normalized within weeks; we sought to examine the longer-lasting impacts on the psychiatric inpatient population beyond this initial period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission data for patients admitted to 8 psychiatric hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 3 time periods - before restrictions were imposed (June 22, 2019, to Mar. 16, 2020), during restrictions (Mar. 17 to June 21, 2020) and after restrictions were lifted (June 22, 2020, to Mar. 16, 2021) for changes in involuntary status, diagnoses and clinical presentation using descriptive analysis. For clinical presentation, we extracted scores on 4 Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health symptom scales (Depressive Severity Index, Cognitive Performance Scale, Positive Symptoms Scale-Long Version and Social Withdrawal Scale), and 2 behaviour scales (Aggressive Behavior Scale and Violence Sum).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cross-sectional sample of 9848 patients was included in the analysis. The mean number of daily admissions decreased 19% from 16.4 (standard deviation [SD] 8.0) before the restriction period to 13.3 (SD 6.1) during the restriction period, and was still 6% below prerestriction levels after restrictions were lifted 15.4 (SD 6.8), with standard error difference of 1.03 (95% confidence interval -0.22 to 2.29). From the pre- to the postrestriction periods, the proportion of involuntary patients increased by 6 percentage points, and the proportions of patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder or personality disorder increased by 4 percentage points and 1 percentage point, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Psychiatric admissions did not fully return to prerestriction levels in absolute rates and patient acuity after COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. Psychiatric services must prepare to appraise and respond to any increased acuity through interventions for patients, workforce planning and mental health support for staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CMAJ open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/1e/cmajo.20220158.PMC10609896.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CMAJ open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新冠肺炎大流行与普通人群的心理健康问题增加有关,但精神病住院人数减少。早期证据表明,精神病入院在几周内正常化;我们试图研究在这一初始时期之后对精神病住院人群的长期影响。方法:我们比较了加拿大安大略省8家精神病医院在实施限制之前(2019年6月22日至2020年3月16日)、限制期间(2020年3月月17日至6月21日)和取消限制之后(2020年6月22-2021年3月6日)3个时间段内非自愿状态变化患者的安大略省精神健康报告系统入院数据,使用描述性分析的诊断和临床表现。在临床表现方面,我们提取了4个住院评估工具心理健康症状量表(抑郁严重程度指数、认知表现量表、阳性症状量表长期版和社交退缩量表)和2个行为量表(攻击性行为量表和暴力总和)的得分。结果:9848名患者的横断面样本被纳入分析。平均每日入院人数从限制期前的16.4(标准差[SD]8.0)下降到限制期内的13.3(标准差6.1),下降了19%,限制解除后仍比限制前水平低6%(标准差6.8),标准误差差为1.03(95%置信区间-0.22-2.29),非自愿患者的比例增加了6个百分点,被诊断为精神病或人格障碍的患者比例分别增加了4个百分点和1个百分点。解释:新冠肺炎限制解除后,精神病入院的绝对发病率和患者视力没有完全恢复到限制前的水平。精神病服务部门必须准备通过对患者的干预、劳动力规划和对工作人员的心理健康支持来评估和应对任何提高的敏锐度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychiatric inpatient services in Ontario, 2019-2021: a cross-sectional comparison of admissions, diagnoses and acuity during the COVID-19 prerestriction, restriction and postrestriction periods.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased mental health problems in the general population, yet psychiatric hospital admissions decreased. Early evidence suggested that psychiatric admissions normalized within weeks; we sought to examine the longer-lasting impacts on the psychiatric inpatient population beyond this initial period.

Methods: We compared Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission data for patients admitted to 8 psychiatric hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 3 time periods - before restrictions were imposed (June 22, 2019, to Mar. 16, 2020), during restrictions (Mar. 17 to June 21, 2020) and after restrictions were lifted (June 22, 2020, to Mar. 16, 2021) for changes in involuntary status, diagnoses and clinical presentation using descriptive analysis. For clinical presentation, we extracted scores on 4 Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health symptom scales (Depressive Severity Index, Cognitive Performance Scale, Positive Symptoms Scale-Long Version and Social Withdrawal Scale), and 2 behaviour scales (Aggressive Behavior Scale and Violence Sum).

Results: A cross-sectional sample of 9848 patients was included in the analysis. The mean number of daily admissions decreased 19% from 16.4 (standard deviation [SD] 8.0) before the restriction period to 13.3 (SD 6.1) during the restriction period, and was still 6% below prerestriction levels after restrictions were lifted 15.4 (SD 6.8), with standard error difference of 1.03 (95% confidence interval -0.22 to 2.29). From the pre- to the postrestriction periods, the proportion of involuntary patients increased by 6 percentage points, and the proportions of patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder or personality disorder increased by 4 percentage points and 1 percentage point, respectively.

Interpretation: Psychiatric admissions did not fully return to prerestriction levels in absolute rates and patient acuity after COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. Psychiatric services must prepare to appraise and respond to any increased acuity through interventions for patients, workforce planning and mental health support for staff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study". Neighbourhood deprivation, distance to nearest comprehensive stroke centre and access to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Social determinants of access to timely elective surgery in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional population level study. The success of publicly funded rotavirus vaccine programs for preventing community- and hospital-acquired rotavirus infections in Canadian pediatric hospitals: an observational study. Trends in hospital coding for people experiencing homelessness in Canada, 2015-2020: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1