心内超声心动图导管再处理用于电生理程序的可行性和安全性——大型单中心经验。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Ultrasound Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1186/s12947-023-00318-4
Vedran Velagic, Giacomo Mugnai, Ivan Prepolec, Vedran Pasara, Anica Milinković, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanic, Jurica Putric Posavec, Davor Puljević, Carlo de Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Davor Milicic
{"title":"心内超声心动图导管再处理用于电生理程序的可行性和安全性——大型单中心经验。","authors":"Vedran Velagic, Giacomo Mugnai, Ivan Prepolec, Vedran Pasara, Anica Milinković, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanic, Jurica Putric Posavec, Davor Puljević, Carlo de Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Davor Milicic","doi":"10.1186/s12947-023-00318-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intra-cardiac echocardiography (ICE) has become an important tool for catheter ablation. Adoption of ICE imaging is still limited because of its prohibitively high cost. Our aim was to study the safety and feasibility of ICE catheters reprocessing and its environmental and financial impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center retrospective analysis of all consecutive electrophysiology procedures in which ICE catheters were used from 2015 to 2022. In total, 1128 patients were studied (70.6% male, mean age was 57.9 ± 13.2 years). The majority of procedures were related to atrial fibrillation ablation (84.6%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the whole cohort, 57 new ICE catheters were used. Consequently one catheter could be used for 19.8 procedures. New catheters were only used when the image obtained by reused probes was not satisfactory. There were no cases of ICE probe steering mechanism malfunction, no procedure related infections and no allergic reactions that could be attributed to the resterilization process. In total, there was 8.6% of complications not related to ICE imaging. Financially, ICE probe reprocessing resulted with 90% cost reduction (> 2 millions of Euros savings for the studied period) and 95% waste reduction (639.5 kg less, mostly non degradable waste was produced).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggests that ICE catheter reprocessing is feasible and safe. It seems that risk of infection is not increased. Significant economic and environmental savings could be achieved by ICE catheters reprocessing. Furthermore, ICE reprocessing could allow more extensive ICE usage resulting in safer procedures with a potential reduction of serious complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9613,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","volume":"21 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and safety of reprocessing of intracardiac echocardiography catheters for electrophysiology procedures - a large single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Vedran Velagic, Giacomo Mugnai, Ivan Prepolec, Vedran Pasara, Anica Milinković, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanic, Jurica Putric Posavec, Davor Puljević, Carlo de Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Davor Milicic\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12947-023-00318-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intra-cardiac echocardiography (ICE) has become an important tool for catheter ablation. Adoption of ICE imaging is still limited because of its prohibitively high cost. Our aim was to study the safety and feasibility of ICE catheters reprocessing and its environmental and financial impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center retrospective analysis of all consecutive electrophysiology procedures in which ICE catheters were used from 2015 to 2022. In total, 1128 patients were studied (70.6% male, mean age was 57.9 ± 13.2 years). The majority of procedures were related to atrial fibrillation ablation (84.6%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the whole cohort, 57 new ICE catheters were used. Consequently one catheter could be used for 19.8 procedures. New catheters were only used when the image obtained by reused probes was not satisfactory. There were no cases of ICE probe steering mechanism malfunction, no procedure related infections and no allergic reactions that could be attributed to the resterilization process. In total, there was 8.6% of complications not related to ICE imaging. Financially, ICE probe reprocessing resulted with 90% cost reduction (> 2 millions of Euros savings for the studied period) and 95% waste reduction (639.5 kg less, mostly non degradable waste was produced).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggests that ICE catheter reprocessing is feasible and safe. It seems that risk of infection is not increased. Significant economic and environmental savings could be achieved by ICE catheters reprocessing. Furthermore, ICE reprocessing could allow more extensive ICE usage resulting in safer procedures with a potential reduction of serious complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601175/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-023-00318-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-023-00318-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心内超声心动图(ICE)已成为导管消融的重要工具。ICE成像的采用仍然受到限制,因为它的成本高得令人望而却步。我们的目的是研究ICE导管再处理的安全性和可行性及其对环境和财务的影响。方法:这是对2015年至2022年使用ICE导管的所有连续电生理程序的单中心回顾性分析。总共研究了1128名患者(70.6%为男性,平均年龄57.9岁 ± 13.2年)。大多数手术与心房颤动消融有关(84.6%)。结果:在整个队列中,使用了57根新的ICE导管。因此,一根导管可用于19.8个手术。只有当重复使用的探头获得的图像不令人满意时,才使用新的导管。没有ICE探头操纵机构故障的病例,没有与手术相关的感染,也没有可归因于再刺激过程的过敏反应。总的来说,8.6%的并发症与ICE成像无关。从财务角度来看,ICE探测器的再处理降低了90%的成本(> 在研究期间节省了200万欧元)和95%的废物减少(减少了639.5公斤,主要是不可降解的废物)。结论:我们的数据表明,ICE导管再处理是可行和安全的。感染的风险似乎没有增加。ICE导管的再处理可以实现显著的经济和环境节约。此外,ICE后处理可以允许更广泛地使用ICE,从而产生更安全的程序,并可能减少严重并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility and safety of reprocessing of intracardiac echocardiography catheters for electrophysiology procedures - a large single center experience.

Purpose: Intra-cardiac echocardiography (ICE) has become an important tool for catheter ablation. Adoption of ICE imaging is still limited because of its prohibitively high cost. Our aim was to study the safety and feasibility of ICE catheters reprocessing and its environmental and financial impact.

Methods: This was a single center retrospective analysis of all consecutive electrophysiology procedures in which ICE catheters were used from 2015 to 2022. In total, 1128 patients were studied (70.6% male, mean age was 57.9 ± 13.2 years). The majority of procedures were related to atrial fibrillation ablation (84.6%).

Results: For the whole cohort, 57 new ICE catheters were used. Consequently one catheter could be used for 19.8 procedures. New catheters were only used when the image obtained by reused probes was not satisfactory. There were no cases of ICE probe steering mechanism malfunction, no procedure related infections and no allergic reactions that could be attributed to the resterilization process. In total, there was 8.6% of complications not related to ICE imaging. Financially, ICE probe reprocessing resulted with 90% cost reduction (> 2 millions of Euros savings for the studied period) and 95% waste reduction (639.5 kg less, mostly non degradable waste was produced).

Conclusion: Our data suggests that ICE catheter reprocessing is feasible and safe. It seems that risk of infection is not increased. Significant economic and environmental savings could be achieved by ICE catheters reprocessing. Furthermore, ICE reprocessing could allow more extensive ICE usage resulting in safer procedures with a potential reduction of serious complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Cardiovascular Ultrasound CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Ultrasound is an online journal, publishing peer-reviewed: original research; authoritative reviews; case reports on challenging and/or unusual diagnostic aspects; and expert opinions on new techniques and technologies. We are particularly interested in articles that include relevant images or video files, which provide an additional dimension to published articles and enhance understanding. As an open access journal, Cardiovascular Ultrasound ensures high visibility for authors in addition to providing an up-to-date and freely available resource for the community. The journal welcomes discussion, and provides a forum for publishing opinion and debate ranging from biology to engineering to clinical echocardiography, with both speed and versatility.
期刊最新文献
Left atrial strain in patients without cardiovascular disease: uncovering influencing and related factors. Left atrial function during exercise stress echocardiography as a sign of paroxysmal/persistent atrial fibrillation. 'Color Doppler stripes' make it difficult to diagnose the severity of valvular heart diseases: a report of two cases. Effects of smoking cessation on endothelial function as assessed by flow-mediated total dilation. Ultrasound enhancing agents in cardiovascular imaging: expanding horizons beyond coronary arteries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1