更正“成年人的社会经济地位、文化资本和社会资本:结构方程模型”[Psicothema 34(1),74-83]。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicothema Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.7334/psicothema2023.193
Elisa Menardo, Marta Viola, Irene Pierluigi, Chiara Cretella, Roberto Cubelli, Giulia Balboni
{"title":"更正“成年人的社会经济地位、文化资本和社会资本:结构方程模型”[Psicothema 34(1),74-83]。","authors":"Elisa Menardo, Marta Viola, Irene Pierluigi, Chiara Cretella, Roberto Cubelli, Giulia Balboni","doi":"10.7334/psicothema2023.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DOI: https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.193 \n\nText:\n\nThis article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version: \n\n1. The investigated alternative models have now been described more clearly. The method for comparing them with the original model has been correctly specified based only on Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and not on the delta Comparative Fit Index, given that the models are not nested. \n2. The formula for computing the critical value to which comparing the Mardia’s index for verifying if the data are multivariate normally distributed is equal to k(k+2) and not, as previously written, equal to k(k+1). \n3. We have now specified that, in the Structural Equation Model, the correlations introduced between the dependent variables are correlations between the unexplained variance and thus may be described as partial correlations. \n4. Finally, we have corrected the direction of the arrows of the lines from Participating, Consuming, and Expert Using observed variables toward the corresponding Cultural Capital latent variable and from Bonding and Bridging observed variables toward the corresponding social capital latent variable. \n\nDOI of original article: (https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2021.231)</p>","PeriodicalId":48179,"journal":{"name":"Psicothema","volume":"35 4","pages":"432"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrigendum to \\\"Socioeconomic Status, Cultural Capital, and Social Capital in Adults: A Structural Equation Model\\\" [Psicothema 34(1), 74-83].\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Menardo, Marta Viola, Irene Pierluigi, Chiara Cretella, Roberto Cubelli, Giulia Balboni\",\"doi\":\"10.7334/psicothema2023.193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>DOI: https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.193 \\n\\nText:\\n\\nThis article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version: \\n\\n1. The investigated alternative models have now been described more clearly. The method for comparing them with the original model has been correctly specified based only on Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and not on the delta Comparative Fit Index, given that the models are not nested. \\n2. The formula for computing the critical value to which comparing the Mardia’s index for verifying if the data are multivariate normally distributed is equal to k(k+2) and not, as previously written, equal to k(k+1). \\n3. We have now specified that, in the Structural Equation Model, the correlations introduced between the dependent variables are correlations between the unexplained variance and thus may be described as partial correlations. \\n4. Finally, we have corrected the direction of the arrows of the lines from Participating, Consuming, and Expert Using observed variables toward the corresponding Cultural Capital latent variable and from Bonding and Bridging observed variables toward the corresponding social capital latent variable. \\n\\nDOI of original article: (https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2021.231)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicothema\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicothema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.193\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicothema","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

DOI:https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.193文本:本文最初发表时有错误,现已在在线版本中更正:1。现在已经更清楚地描述了所研究的替代模型。仅根据Akaike&rsquo的;s信息准则(AIC),而不是在德尔塔比较拟合指数上,假设模型没有嵌套。2.计算临界值的公式,将Mardia&rsquo的;用于验证数据是否是多元正态分布的s指数等于k(k+2),而不是如前所述等于k(k+1)。3.我们现在已经指出,在结构方程模型中,因变量之间引入的相关性是无法解释的方差之间的相关性,因此可以被描述为偏相关性。4.最后,我们校正了从参与、消费和专家使用观察变量到相应的文化资本潜变量以及从联结和桥接观察变量到对应的社会资本潜变量的箭头方向。原文章DOI:(https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.231)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corrigendum to "Socioeconomic Status, Cultural Capital, and Social Capital in Adults: A Structural Equation Model" [Psicothema 34(1), 74-83].

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.193 Text: This article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version: 1. The investigated alternative models have now been described more clearly. The method for comparing them with the original model has been correctly specified based only on Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and not on the delta Comparative Fit Index, given that the models are not nested. 2. The formula for computing the critical value to which comparing the Mardia’s index for verifying if the data are multivariate normally distributed is equal to k(k+2) and not, as previously written, equal to k(k+1). 3. We have now specified that, in the Structural Equation Model, the correlations introduced between the dependent variables are correlations between the unexplained variance and thus may be described as partial correlations. 4. Finally, we have corrected the direction of the arrows of the lines from Participating, Consuming, and Expert Using observed variables toward the corresponding Cultural Capital latent variable and from Bonding and Bridging observed variables toward the corresponding social capital latent variable. DOI of original article: (https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2021.231)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicothema
Psicothema PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Psicothema fue fundada en Asturias en 1989 y está editada conjuntamente por la Facultad y el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. Publica cuatro números al año. Se admiten trabajos tanto de investigación básica como aplicada, pertenecientes a cualquier ámbito de la Psicología, que previamente a su publicación son evaluados anónimamente por revisores externos. Psicothema está incluida en las bases de datos nacionales e internacionales más relevantes, entre las que cabe destacar Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents y MEDLINE/Index Medicus, entre otras. Además, figura en las listas de Factor de Impacto del Journal Citation Reports. Psicothema es una revista abierta a cualquier enfoque u orientación psicológica que venga avalada por la fuerza de los datos y los argumentos, y en la que encuentran acomodo todos los autores que sean capaces de convencer a los revisores de que sus manuscritos tienen la calidad para ser publicados. Psicothema es una revista de acceso abierto lo que significa que todo el contenido está a disposición de cualquier usuario o institución sin cargo alguno. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o realizar enlaces a los textos completos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo al editor o al autor, siempre y cuando la fuente original sea referenciada. Para acervos y repositorios, se prefiere que la cobertura se realice mediante enlaces a la propia web de Psicothema. Nos parece que una apuesta decidida por la calidad es el mejor modo de servir a nuestros lectores, cuyas sugerencias siempre serán bienvenidas.
期刊最新文献
Facing Fear and Embracing Safety: Validation of the COVID-19 Psychosocial Scales in Essential Frontline Workers During the Pandemic. Giftedness and Family Well-being: The Role of Emotional Intelligence, Perceived Social Support and Stress. Nighttime Fears and Coping Responses in School-Aged Children: A Latent Profile Analysis. Online Gendered Violence Victimization Among Adults: Prevalence, Predictors and Psychological Outcomes. Psychometric Properties of the Online Version of the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): A Longitudinal Study in Pregnant and Postpartum Spanish Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1