演员投入强度的性质:一个分类方案

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Service Management Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1108/josm-11-2022-0348
Eva Qi Wang, Julia A. Fehrer, Loic Pengtao Li, Roderick J. Brodie, Biljana Juric
{"title":"演员投入强度的性质:一个分类方案","authors":"Eva Qi Wang, Julia A. Fehrer, Loic Pengtao Li, Roderick J. Brodie, Biljana Juric","doi":"10.1108/josm-11-2022-0348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Actor engagement (AE) literature shows inconsistent understandings of engagement intensity. However, a holistic picture of the nature of AE intensity is foundational to advance empirical AE models and measurement frameworks. This paper provides a nuanced understanding of what engagement intensity is and how it unfolds on different network levels.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This conceptual study draws from a literature review and offers a comprehensive classification scheme of AE intensity. The literature review extends beyond marketing and service research and draws from the etymology of AE intensity in management and social science, specifically, the fields of student, employee and civic engagement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The classification scheme clarifies that AE intensity at the individual level refers to actors' affective and cognitive tone and varying magnitudes (i.e. efforts, duration, activeness) of resource investments. At the dyad level, AE intensity represents relational strength, and at the network level, it refers to the degree of connectedness in the network.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The research reconciles conceptual inconsistencies in the AE literature. Our classification scheme goes beyond the individual actor and actor–actor dyad and offers a holistic overview of possible ways to operationalize AE intensity in networks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The classification scheme can be used as a strategic checklist to include AE intensities of individual actors (e.g. customers and employees), relationships between these actors and network connectedness, when further developing engagement measurement tools and benchmarks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This is the first study providing a comprehensive understanding of AE intensity from an individual, dyadic and network perspective.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nature of actor engagement intensity: a classification scheme\",\"authors\":\"Eva Qi Wang, Julia A. Fehrer, Loic Pengtao Li, Roderick J. Brodie, Biljana Juric\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/josm-11-2022-0348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Actor engagement (AE) literature shows inconsistent understandings of engagement intensity. However, a holistic picture of the nature of AE intensity is foundational to advance empirical AE models and measurement frameworks. This paper provides a nuanced understanding of what engagement intensity is and how it unfolds on different network levels.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This conceptual study draws from a literature review and offers a comprehensive classification scheme of AE intensity. The literature review extends beyond marketing and service research and draws from the etymology of AE intensity in management and social science, specifically, the fields of student, employee and civic engagement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The classification scheme clarifies that AE intensity at the individual level refers to actors' affective and cognitive tone and varying magnitudes (i.e. efforts, duration, activeness) of resource investments. At the dyad level, AE intensity represents relational strength, and at the network level, it refers to the degree of connectedness in the network.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The research reconciles conceptual inconsistencies in the AE literature. Our classification scheme goes beyond the individual actor and actor–actor dyad and offers a holistic overview of possible ways to operationalize AE intensity in networks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The classification scheme can be used as a strategic checklist to include AE intensities of individual actors (e.g. customers and employees), relationships between these actors and network connectedness, when further developing engagement measurement tools and benchmarks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This is the first study providing a comprehensive understanding of AE intensity from an individual, dyadic and network perspective.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Service Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Service Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2022-0348\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2022-0348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行动者投入(AE)文献显示对投入强度的理解不一致。然而,对声发射强度性质的全面了解是推进经验声发射模型和测量框架的基础。本文对什么是粘性强度以及它如何在不同的网络层面展开进行了细致入微的理解。设计/方法/方法本概念性研究借鉴了文献综述,并提供了声发射强度的综合分类方案。文献综述超越了市场营销和服务研究,并借鉴了管理和社会科学中AE强度的词源,特别是学生,员工和公民参与领域。分类方案明确了个体层面的声发射强度是指行为者的情感和认知基调以及资源投入的不同程度(即努力程度、持续时间、活跃度)。在二元层次上,声发射强度代表关系强度,在网络层次上,声发射强度代表网络的连通性。研究局限性/意义本研究调和了声发射文献中概念上的不一致。我们的分类方案超越了个体行为者和行为者-行为者二元组合,并提供了在网络中操作声发射强度的可能方法的整体概述。在进一步开发敬业度测量工具和基准时,该分类方案可以用作战略检查表,包括个体参与者(例如客户和员工)的AE强度,这些参与者之间的关系和网络连通性。原创性/价值这是第一个从个体、二元和网络角度全面理解声发射强度的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The nature of actor engagement intensity: a classification scheme

Purpose

Actor engagement (AE) literature shows inconsistent understandings of engagement intensity. However, a holistic picture of the nature of AE intensity is foundational to advance empirical AE models and measurement frameworks. This paper provides a nuanced understanding of what engagement intensity is and how it unfolds on different network levels.

Design/methodology/approach

This conceptual study draws from a literature review and offers a comprehensive classification scheme of AE intensity. The literature review extends beyond marketing and service research and draws from the etymology of AE intensity in management and social science, specifically, the fields of student, employee and civic engagement.

Findings

The classification scheme clarifies that AE intensity at the individual level refers to actors' affective and cognitive tone and varying magnitudes (i.e. efforts, duration, activeness) of resource investments. At the dyad level, AE intensity represents relational strength, and at the network level, it refers to the degree of connectedness in the network.

Research limitations/implications

The research reconciles conceptual inconsistencies in the AE literature. Our classification scheme goes beyond the individual actor and actor–actor dyad and offers a holistic overview of possible ways to operationalize AE intensity in networks.

Practical implications

The classification scheme can be used as a strategic checklist to include AE intensities of individual actors (e.g. customers and employees), relationships between these actors and network connectedness, when further developing engagement measurement tools and benchmarks.

Originality/value

This is the first study providing a comprehensive understanding of AE intensity from an individual, dyadic and network perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Service virtuousness: implementing the very best of human qualities in service delivery Frontline employee work engagement and customer service evaluations: a conceptual replication Reuse of service concept elements for modular service design Organizational resiliency through practice innovation: forced brand evolution in a prolonged exogenous service ecosystem disruption Howdy, Robo-Partner: exploring artificial companionship and its stress-alleviating potential for service employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1