通过解决剪切破坏对意大利70年前钢筋混凝土建筑进行抗震改造的案例研究:符合规范的评估和经济努力

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104007
Maria Teresa De Risi, Santa Anna Scala, Carlo Del Gaudio, Gerardo Mario Verderame
{"title":"通过解决剪切破坏对意大利70年前钢筋混凝土建筑进行抗震改造的案例研究:符合规范的评估和经济努力","authors":"Maria Teresa De Risi,&nbsp;Santa Anna Scala,&nbsp;Carlo Del Gaudio,&nbsp;Gerardo Mario Verderame","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings designed for gravity loads only (GLD) are widespread worldwide even in seismic prone areas, including Italy, showing a significant vulnerability to shear failures under seismic shaking.</p><p>This work focuses on the seismic upgrading of pre-70 GLD buildings, by means of solving tensile shear failures of primary elements. Its technical effectiveness, depending on building height and seismic hazard throughout the Italian country, is also evaluated.</p><p>RC GLD moment resisting frames case-study buildings, with the same floorplan, and a number of stories ranging from 2 to 6 are considered. Seismic assessment is performed using nonlinear static analyses, according to the current Italian technical code. Then, strengthening interventions, based on fibre reinforced polymers wrapping for beams/columns and pre-stressed steel strips for beam-column joints, are designed aiming at solving the detected tensile shear failures at Severe Damage Limit State. Post-strengthening seismic capacity is compared with seismic demand throughout the Italian country, finding that 2- and 3-storey buildings can always reach 100% of safety level of a newly designed building. This condition is attained, on average, also for 4- to 6-storey buildings only in sites where the peak ground acceleration demand is lower than 0.15 g. In the other sites, the 60% of the safety level of a newly designed building can be achieved, on average.</p><p>Lastly, the economically feasibility of the adopted strengthening strategy is examined through its comparison with the most recent grant opportunities to mitigate seismic risk of buildings funded by Italian government.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 104007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic retrofit of Italian pre-‘70 case-study RC buildings by solving shear failures: code-compliant assessment and economic effort\",\"authors\":\"Maria Teresa De Risi,&nbsp;Santa Anna Scala,&nbsp;Carlo Del Gaudio,&nbsp;Gerardo Mario Verderame\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings designed for gravity loads only (GLD) are widespread worldwide even in seismic prone areas, including Italy, showing a significant vulnerability to shear failures under seismic shaking.</p><p>This work focuses on the seismic upgrading of pre-70 GLD buildings, by means of solving tensile shear failures of primary elements. Its technical effectiveness, depending on building height and seismic hazard throughout the Italian country, is also evaluated.</p><p>RC GLD moment resisting frames case-study buildings, with the same floorplan, and a number of stories ranging from 2 to 6 are considered. Seismic assessment is performed using nonlinear static analyses, according to the current Italian technical code. Then, strengthening interventions, based on fibre reinforced polymers wrapping for beams/columns and pre-stressed steel strips for beam-column joints, are designed aiming at solving the detected tensile shear failures at Severe Damage Limit State. Post-strengthening seismic capacity is compared with seismic demand throughout the Italian country, finding that 2- and 3-storey buildings can always reach 100% of safety level of a newly designed building. This condition is attained, on average, also for 4- to 6-storey buildings only in sites where the peak ground acceleration demand is lower than 0.15 g. In the other sites, the 60% of the safety level of a newly designed building can be achieved, on average.</p><p>Lastly, the economically feasibility of the adopted strengthening strategy is examined through its comparison with the most recent grant opportunities to mitigate seismic risk of buildings funded by Italian government.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420923004879\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420923004879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的仅为重力荷载(GLD)设计的钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑在世界各地都很普遍,即使是在包括意大利在内的地震多发地区,也显示出在地震震动下极易发生剪切破坏。这项工作的重点是通过解决主要构件的拉剪破坏,对70年代以前的GLD建筑进行抗震升级。根据整个意大利的建筑高度和地震危险性,还对其技术有效性进行了评估。RC GLD抗弯框架案例研究建筑,具有相同的平面布置图,层数从2层到6层不等。根据意大利现行技术规范,采用非线性静态分析进行抗震评估。然后,设计了基于梁/柱纤维增强聚合物包裹和梁柱节点预应力钢带的加固干预措施,旨在解决严重损伤极限状态下检测到的拉伸剪切失效。将加固后的抗震能力与意大利全国的抗震需求进行了比较,发现2层和3层建筑总能达到新设计建筑的100%安全水平。平均而言,只有在峰值地面加速度需求低于0.15g的场地,4至6层建筑才能达到这一条件。在其他场地,新设计建筑的安全水平平均可以达到60%。最后,通过与意大利政府资助的减轻建筑物地震风险的最新赠款机会的比较,研究了所采用的加固策略的经济可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seismic retrofit of Italian pre-‘70 case-study RC buildings by solving shear failures: code-compliant assessment and economic effort

Existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings designed for gravity loads only (GLD) are widespread worldwide even in seismic prone areas, including Italy, showing a significant vulnerability to shear failures under seismic shaking.

This work focuses on the seismic upgrading of pre-70 GLD buildings, by means of solving tensile shear failures of primary elements. Its technical effectiveness, depending on building height and seismic hazard throughout the Italian country, is also evaluated.

RC GLD moment resisting frames case-study buildings, with the same floorplan, and a number of stories ranging from 2 to 6 are considered. Seismic assessment is performed using nonlinear static analyses, according to the current Italian technical code. Then, strengthening interventions, based on fibre reinforced polymers wrapping for beams/columns and pre-stressed steel strips for beam-column joints, are designed aiming at solving the detected tensile shear failures at Severe Damage Limit State. Post-strengthening seismic capacity is compared with seismic demand throughout the Italian country, finding that 2- and 3-storey buildings can always reach 100% of safety level of a newly designed building. This condition is attained, on average, also for 4- to 6-storey buildings only in sites where the peak ground acceleration demand is lower than 0.15 g. In the other sites, the 60% of the safety level of a newly designed building can be achieved, on average.

Lastly, the economically feasibility of the adopted strengthening strategy is examined through its comparison with the most recent grant opportunities to mitigate seismic risk of buildings funded by Italian government.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of tangible coastal inundation damage related to critical infrastructure and buildings: The case of Mauritius Island Geospatial analysis of alarmingly increasing flood vulnerability and disaster risk within the northeast himalaya region of India Cues facilitating collective sensemaking during emergencies: Gaps, inconsistencies, and indicators Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of flood resilience in Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration Urban flood hazard insights from multiple perspectives based on internet of things sensor data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1