农田规模对能量法小麦生产可持续性的影响

IF 3.7 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100161
Samin Fallahinejad , Mohamad Armin , Mohamad Reza Asgharipour
{"title":"农田规模对能量法小麦生产可持续性的影响","authors":"Samin Fallahinejad ,&nbsp;Mohamad Armin ,&nbsp;Mohamad Reza Asgharipour","doi":"10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effect of three farm areas, including small, medium, and large, on the sustainability of wheat production was studied using the emergy technique in 2018–19 in Jovein, Iran. By increasing the size of the farm, the share of renewable natural resources decreased and the share of purchased resources increased. The total emergy supporting small, medium, and large farms, was 1.39 × 10<sup>16</sup>, 1.95 × 10<sup>16</sup>, and 2.16 × 10<sup>16</sup> sej ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. In small farms, the share of renewable natural inputs, non-renewable natural inputs, and purchased inputs of total input emergy were 55.6 × 10<sup>13</sup>, 63.01 × 10<sup>14</sup>, and 70.30 × 10<sup>14</sup> sej ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. However, the share of renewable natural inputs, non-renewable natural inputs, and purchased inputs on large farms were 50.9 × 10<sup>13</sup>, 11.38 × 10<sup>16</sup>, and 98.03 × 10<sup>15</sup> sej ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. As the farm size increased from small to large, the emergy yield ratio and emergy investment ratio increased by 11.11% and 101%, respectively, while the unit emergy value, renewable emergy ratio, emergy investment ratio, and environmental sustainability index decreased by 27.31, 50.61, 45.45, and 18.65%, respectively. According to the results, although cultivation in large farms uses less renewable environmental resources and more purchased resources, a higher yield is produced per unit area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34472,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000391/pdfft?md5=bfc2c5e8979e03c23c4c9ad774f5e201&pid=1-s2.0-S2666049022000391-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of farm size on the sustainability of wheat production using emergy approach\",\"authors\":\"Samin Fallahinejad ,&nbsp;Mohamad Armin ,&nbsp;Mohamad Reza Asgharipour\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effect of three farm areas, including small, medium, and large, on the sustainability of wheat production was studied using the emergy technique in 2018–19 in Jovein, Iran. By increasing the size of the farm, the share of renewable natural resources decreased and the share of purchased resources increased. The total emergy supporting small, medium, and large farms, was 1.39 × 10<sup>16</sup>, 1.95 × 10<sup>16</sup>, and 2.16 × 10<sup>16</sup> sej ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. In small farms, the share of renewable natural inputs, non-renewable natural inputs, and purchased inputs of total input emergy were 55.6 × 10<sup>13</sup>, 63.01 × 10<sup>14</sup>, and 70.30 × 10<sup>14</sup> sej ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. However, the share of renewable natural inputs, non-renewable natural inputs, and purchased inputs on large farms were 50.9 × 10<sup>13</sup>, 11.38 × 10<sup>16</sup>, and 98.03 × 10<sup>15</sup> sej ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. As the farm size increased from small to large, the emergy yield ratio and emergy investment ratio increased by 11.11% and 101%, respectively, while the unit emergy value, renewable emergy ratio, emergy investment ratio, and environmental sustainability index decreased by 27.31, 50.61, 45.45, and 18.65%, respectively. According to the results, although cultivation in large farms uses less renewable environmental resources and more purchased resources, a higher yield is produced per unit area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000391/pdfft?md5=bfc2c5e8979e03c23c4c9ad774f5e201&pid=1-s2.0-S2666049022000391-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

2018 - 2019年,在伊朗Jovein使用能量技术研究了小、中、大三个农场对小麦生产可持续性的影响。通过增加农场规模,可再生自然资源的份额减少,购买资源的份额增加。支持小型、中型和大型养殖场的总能分别为1.39 × 1016、1.95 × 1016和2.16 × 1016 sej ha−1 yr−1。在小农场,可再生自然投入、不可再生自然投入和购买投入占总投入能的比重分别为55.6 × 1013、63.01 × 1014和70.30 × 1014 sej ha - 1 yr - 1。然而,大型农场可再生自然投入、不可再生自然投入和购买投入的份额分别为50.9 × 1013、11.38 × 1016和98.03 × 1015 sej ha - 1年−1。随着规模由小到大,能产出率和能投资比分别提高了11.11%和101%,而单位能值、可再生能比、能投资比和环境可持续性指数分别下降了27.31%、50.61%、45.45%和18.65%。结果表明,虽然大型农场的种植使用较少的可再生环境资源和更多的购买资源,但单位面积的产量更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of farm size on the sustainability of wheat production using emergy approach

The effect of three farm areas, including small, medium, and large, on the sustainability of wheat production was studied using the emergy technique in 2018–19 in Jovein, Iran. By increasing the size of the farm, the share of renewable natural resources decreased and the share of purchased resources increased. The total emergy supporting small, medium, and large farms, was 1.39 × 1016, 1.95 × 1016, and 2.16 × 1016 sej ha−1 yr−1, respectively. In small farms, the share of renewable natural inputs, non-renewable natural inputs, and purchased inputs of total input emergy were 55.6 × 1013, 63.01 × 1014, and 70.30 × 1014 sej ha−1 yr−1, respectively. However, the share of renewable natural inputs, non-renewable natural inputs, and purchased inputs on large farms were 50.9 × 1013, 11.38 × 1016, and 98.03 × 1015 sej ha−1 yr−1, respectively. As the farm size increased from small to large, the emergy yield ratio and emergy investment ratio increased by 11.11% and 101%, respectively, while the unit emergy value, renewable emergy ratio, emergy investment ratio, and environmental sustainability index decreased by 27.31, 50.61, 45.45, and 18.65%, respectively. According to the results, although cultivation in large farms uses less renewable environmental resources and more purchased resources, a higher yield is produced per unit area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
95 days
期刊最新文献
Achieving sustainability in family farming Green bonds and sustainable business models in Nordic energy companies Sustainability solutions: A new article type to address critical environmental challenges of the Anthropocene The European green deal, retail investors and sustainable investments: A perspective article covering economic, behavioral, and regulatory insights Performance of Equisetum spp and Zantedeschia aethiopica on the evaluation of artificial wetlands as an alternative for wastewater treatment in rural areas of the Ecuadorian Andes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1