D. Baiwir , G. Mazzucchelli , N. Smargiasso , F. Quesada-Calvo , E. De Pauw , M. Malaise , E. Louis , M.-A. Meuwis
{"title":"数据独立的无标记蛋白质组学血清分离方法的比较","authors":"D. Baiwir , G. Mazzucchelli , N. Smargiasso , F. Quesada-Calvo , E. De Pauw , M. Malaise , E. Louis , M.-A. Meuwis","doi":"10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Off-line sample prefractionations applied prior to biomarker discovery proteomics are options to enable more protein identifications and detect low-abundance proteins. This work compared five commercial methods efficiency to raw serum analysis using label-free proteomics. The variability of the protein quantities determined for each process was similar to the unprefractionated serum. A 49% increase in protein identifications and 12.2% of reliable quantification were obtained. A 61 times lower limit of protein quantitation was reached compared to protein concentrations observed in raw serum. The concentrations of detected proteins were confronted to estimated reference values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38260,"journal":{"name":"EuPA Open Proteomics","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of serum fractionation methods by data independent label-free proteomics\",\"authors\":\"D. Baiwir , G. Mazzucchelli , N. Smargiasso , F. Quesada-Calvo , E. De Pauw , M. Malaise , E. Louis , M.-A. Meuwis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Off-line sample prefractionations applied prior to biomarker discovery proteomics are options to enable more protein identifications and detect low-abundance proteins. This work compared five commercial methods efficiency to raw serum analysis using label-free proteomics. The variability of the protein quantities determined for each process was similar to the unprefractionated serum. A 49% increase in protein identifications and 12.2% of reliable quantification were obtained. A 61 times lower limit of protein quantitation was reached compared to protein concentrations observed in raw serum. The concentrations of detected proteins were confronted to estimated reference values.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EuPA Open Proteomics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 14-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EuPA Open Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212968515300118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuPA Open Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212968515300118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of serum fractionation methods by data independent label-free proteomics
Off-line sample prefractionations applied prior to biomarker discovery proteomics are options to enable more protein identifications and detect low-abundance proteins. This work compared five commercial methods efficiency to raw serum analysis using label-free proteomics. The variability of the protein quantities determined for each process was similar to the unprefractionated serum. A 49% increase in protein identifications and 12.2% of reliable quantification were obtained. A 61 times lower limit of protein quantitation was reached compared to protein concentrations observed in raw serum. The concentrations of detected proteins were confronted to estimated reference values.