美国农村和小城市交通机构同行分组的方法

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Public Transportation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100028
Paul Ryus , Kaitlyn Schaffer , Albert Gan , Nancy Doherty
{"title":"美国农村和小城市交通机构同行分组的方法","authors":"Paul Ryus ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Schaffer ,&nbsp;Albert Gan ,&nbsp;Nancy Doherty","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Peer comparison is a valuable management tool for identifying a transit provider’s areas of relative strength, areas with room for improvement, and high-performing peers to learn from. While the U.S. Rural National Transit Database (NTD) provides performance data about rural and small city transit providers, methods and tools have been lacking for these providers to apply NTD data to identify appropriate peers. This paper describes the development of a rural transit peer-grouping method as a counterpart to a method previously developed and implemented for urban providers, and compares this method to previous transit peer-grouping approaches. In contrast to most previous efforts, which have produced fixed and often large peer groups, this method dynamically and transparently identifies appropriate peers for individual rural and small city transit providers. The method has been implemented in freely available web-based software.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285/pdfft?md5=4d8452356150b71dc38d4e57a47c561e&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000285-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology for rural and small-city U.S. transit agency peer grouping\",\"authors\":\"Paul Ryus ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Schaffer ,&nbsp;Albert Gan ,&nbsp;Nancy Doherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Peer comparison is a valuable management tool for identifying a transit provider’s areas of relative strength, areas with room for improvement, and high-performing peers to learn from. While the U.S. Rural National Transit Database (NTD) provides performance data about rural and small city transit providers, methods and tools have been lacking for these providers to apply NTD data to identify appropriate peers. This paper describes the development of a rural transit peer-grouping method as a counterpart to a method previously developed and implemented for urban providers, and compares this method to previous transit peer-grouping approaches. In contrast to most previous efforts, which have produced fixed and often large peer groups, this method dynamically and transparently identifies appropriate peers for individual rural and small city transit providers. The method has been implemented in freely available web-based software.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285/pdfft?md5=4d8452356150b71dc38d4e57a47c561e&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000285-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同行比较是一种很有价值的管理工具,它可以确定公交供应商的相对优势领域、改进空间以及值得学习的高绩效同行。虽然美国农村国家交通数据库(NTD)提供了关于农村和小城市交通供应商的绩效数据,但这些供应商缺乏方法和工具来应用NTD数据来识别合适的同行。本文描述了农村交通对等分组方法的发展,作为先前为城市供应商开发和实施的方法的对应方法,并将该方法与以前的交通对等分组方法进行了比较。与以往大多数产生固定且往往较大的同行群体的努力不同,这种方法动态地、透明地为个别农村和小城市交通供应商确定适当的同行。该方法已在免费的网络软件中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodology for rural and small-city U.S. transit agency peer grouping

Peer comparison is a valuable management tool for identifying a transit provider’s areas of relative strength, areas with room for improvement, and high-performing peers to learn from. While the U.S. Rural National Transit Database (NTD) provides performance data about rural and small city transit providers, methods and tools have been lacking for these providers to apply NTD data to identify appropriate peers. This paper describes the development of a rural transit peer-grouping method as a counterpart to a method previously developed and implemented for urban providers, and compares this method to previous transit peer-grouping approaches. In contrast to most previous efforts, which have produced fixed and often large peer groups, this method dynamically and transparently identifies appropriate peers for individual rural and small city transit providers. The method has been implemented in freely available web-based software.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.
期刊最新文献
Simulating the effect of strategies to increase transit ridership by reallocating bus service: Two case studies Evaluating public a priori acceptance of autonomous modular transit using an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model The crucial role of motorcycle-based ride-hailing among commuters: The case of Jakarta and Bandung in metropolitan areas Bus stop spacing statistics: Theory and evidence Analyzing the relationship between bus and ride-hailing use in a large emerging economy city: A bivariate ordered probit model application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1