超越结果研究:良好的心理治疗建立在许多可靠的认知基础之上

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100950
Raymond M. Bergner
{"title":"超越结果研究:良好的心理治疗建立在许多可靠的认知基础之上","authors":"Raymond M. Bergner","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article argues the thesis that rigorous, strongly reasoned psychotherapeutic practice rests, not only (and not always) on outcome research, but on many further equally, and in some cases more, secure epistemic foundations. In part 1 of the article, based on currently well-established epistemological thinking, a ranking of the degree of certainty of propositions yielded by different knowledge sources, and thus the confidence with which we may believe and act upon them, is presented. Following the description of each knowledge source, an analysis of the degree to which it enters into the practice of psychotherapy is developed. In part 2, several further knowledge sources essential to psychotherapy that are difficult to rank are presented, as well as the confidence that can reasonably be placed in knowledge derived from these sources. In part 3, an individual therapy session conducted by Aaron Beck is analyzed to illustrate its utilization of many of the knowledge sources discussed in the article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 100950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond outcome studies: Good psychotherapy rests on many secure epistemic foundations\",\"authors\":\"Raymond M. Bergner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article argues the thesis that rigorous, strongly reasoned psychotherapeutic practice rests, not only (and not always) on outcome research, but on many further equally, and in some cases more, secure epistemic foundations. In part 1 of the article, based on currently well-established epistemological thinking, a ranking of the degree of certainty of propositions yielded by different knowledge sources, and thus the confidence with which we may believe and act upon them, is presented. Following the description of each knowledge source, an analysis of the degree to which it enters into the practice of psychotherapy is developed. In part 2, several further knowledge sources essential to psychotherapy that are difficult to rank are presented, as well as the confidence that can reasonably be placed in knowledge derived from these sources. In part 3, an individual therapy session conducted by Aaron Beck is analyzed to illustrate its utilization of many of the knowledge sources discussed in the article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X22000204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X22000204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文论证了这样一个论点:严谨的、理性的心理治疗实践不仅(也不总是)依赖于结果研究,还依赖于许多进一步的、同样的、在某些情况下更安全的认知基础。在文章的第一部分中,基于目前公认的认识论思想,对不同知识来源产生的命题的确定性程度进行了排序,从而提出了我们可以相信并根据它们采取行动的信心。在描述每个知识来源之后,对其进入心理治疗实践的程度进行了分析。在第2部分中,介绍了对心理治疗至关重要的几个难以排序的进一步的知识来源,以及可以合理地置于这些来源的知识中的信心。在第3部分中,分析了Aaron Beck进行的个别治疗会议,以说明其对文章中讨论的许多知识来源的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond outcome studies: Good psychotherapy rests on many secure epistemic foundations

This article argues the thesis that rigorous, strongly reasoned psychotherapeutic practice rests, not only (and not always) on outcome research, but on many further equally, and in some cases more, secure epistemic foundations. In part 1 of the article, based on currently well-established epistemological thinking, a ranking of the degree of certainty of propositions yielded by different knowledge sources, and thus the confidence with which we may believe and act upon them, is presented. Following the description of each knowledge source, an analysis of the degree to which it enters into the practice of psychotherapy is developed. In part 2, several further knowledge sources essential to psychotherapy that are difficult to rank are presented, as well as the confidence that can reasonably be placed in knowledge derived from these sources. In part 3, an individual therapy session conducted by Aaron Beck is analyzed to illustrate its utilization of many of the knowledge sources discussed in the article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Psychiatrization in Czech lexical data: Everyday adjectives are acquiring clinical connotations Editorial Board What happens to representatives during family constellations? Attempts at explanation and comparison with other difficult-to-explain phenomena Re-enchanting mirror neurons through lexical changes Actions Speak Louder than outcomes leading to ineffective altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1