高危人群衣原体感染:扩增PCR和Gen-Probe PACE II诊断的比较

T.C.H. Hsuih B.A. , A. Guichon M.S. , A. Diaz M.D. , E.J. Bottone Ph.D. , R. Sperling M.D. , D.Y. Zhang M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"高危人群衣原体感染:扩增PCR和Gen-Probe PACE II诊断的比较","authors":"T.C.H. Hsuih B.A. ,&nbsp;A. Guichon M.S. ,&nbsp;A. Diaz M.D. ,&nbsp;E.J. Bottone Ph.D. ,&nbsp;R. Sperling M.D. ,&nbsp;D.Y. Zhang M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/S0932-8610(19)80128-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivities and specificities of two molecular techniques, polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor) and DNA hybridization probe (Gen-Probe PACE II), for the detection of <em>Chlamydia trachomatis</em> in cervical specimens. A total of 378 cervical specimens were collected from 189 female adolescent patients and tested with either Amplicor or Gen-Probe PACE II. Sociodemographic data and sexually transmitted disease risk behavior were also collected from patient charts and analyzed. The population comprised young adolescents (mean age 17.7) who were sexually active (77.1% had one or more partners in the last 3 months) with a relatively long duration of sexual activity (mean 2.8 years). The prevalence rates of cervical <em>C. trachomatis</em> infection diagnosed by Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II were 7.9 and 9.0%, respectively. Patients testing positive for <em>C. trachomatis</em> had a significant percentage of Pap smears with inflammatory results (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.005). After initial testing, Amplicor had a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 93.3%, whereas Gen-Probe PACE II had a sensitivity of 99.4% and a specificity of 98.3%. After discrepant analysis, Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II had an equal sensitivity of 93.7%; the specificities were 100 and 98.8%, respectively. However, Gen-Probe PACE II had a 1% false-positive rate. Both Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II are highly sensitive. However, Amplicor is more specific and can be used as a confirmatory test. Either test for <em>C. trachomatis</em> may be indicated in patients with abnormal Pap smears.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80358,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent and pediatric gynecology","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0932-8610(19)80128-7","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chlamydial infection in a high-risk population: Comparison of amplicor PCR and Gen-Probe PACE II for diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"T.C.H. Hsuih B.A. ,&nbsp;A. Guichon M.S. ,&nbsp;A. Diaz M.D. ,&nbsp;E.J. Bottone Ph.D. ,&nbsp;R. Sperling M.D. ,&nbsp;D.Y. Zhang M.D., Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0932-8610(19)80128-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivities and specificities of two molecular techniques, polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor) and DNA hybridization probe (Gen-Probe PACE II), for the detection of <em>Chlamydia trachomatis</em> in cervical specimens. A total of 378 cervical specimens were collected from 189 female adolescent patients and tested with either Amplicor or Gen-Probe PACE II. Sociodemographic data and sexually transmitted disease risk behavior were also collected from patient charts and analyzed. The population comprised young adolescents (mean age 17.7) who were sexually active (77.1% had one or more partners in the last 3 months) with a relatively long duration of sexual activity (mean 2.8 years). The prevalence rates of cervical <em>C. trachomatis</em> infection diagnosed by Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II were 7.9 and 9.0%, respectively. Patients testing positive for <em>C. trachomatis</em> had a significant percentage of Pap smears with inflammatory results (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.005). After initial testing, Amplicor had a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 93.3%, whereas Gen-Probe PACE II had a sensitivity of 99.4% and a specificity of 98.3%. After discrepant analysis, Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II had an equal sensitivity of 93.7%; the specificities were 100 and 98.8%, respectively. However, Gen-Probe PACE II had a 1% false-positive rate. Both Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II are highly sensitive. However, Amplicor is more specific and can be used as a confirmatory test. Either test for <em>C. trachomatis</em> may be indicated in patients with abnormal Pap smears.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent and pediatric gynecology\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 71-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0932-8610(19)80128-7\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent and pediatric gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0932861019801287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent and pediatric gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0932861019801287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是比较聚合酶链反应(Amplicor)和DNA杂交探针(Gen-Probe PACE II)两种分子技术检测宫颈标本中沙眼衣原体的敏感性和特异性。从189名女性青少年患者中共收集378份宫颈标本,并使用Amplicor或Gen-Probe PACE II进行检测。从患者图表中收集社会人口统计数据和性传播疾病风险行为并进行分析。人口包括性活跃的年轻青少年(平均年龄17.7岁)(77.1%在过去3个月内有一个或多个伴侣),性活动持续时间相对较长(平均2.8年)。Amplicor和Gen-Probe PACE II诊断宫颈沙眼衣原体感染的患病率分别为7.9%和9.0%。沙眼原体检测阳性的患者在巴氏涂片检查中出现炎症结果的比例显著(p <0.005)。初步检测后,Amplicor的灵敏度为82.4%,特异性为93.3%,而Gen-Probe PACE II的灵敏度为99.4%,特异性为98.3%。差异分析后,Amplicor和Gen-Probe PACE II的灵敏度为93.7%;特异性分别为100%和98.8%。然而,Gen-Probe PACE II的假阳性率为1%。Amplicor和Gen-Probe PACE II都具有高灵敏度。然而,Amplicor更具特异性,可以用作确认性测试。宫颈抹片检查异常的患者可进行沙眼衣原体检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chlamydial infection in a high-risk population: Comparison of amplicor PCR and Gen-Probe PACE II for diagnosis

The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivities and specificities of two molecular techniques, polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor) and DNA hybridization probe (Gen-Probe PACE II), for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens. A total of 378 cervical specimens were collected from 189 female adolescent patients and tested with either Amplicor or Gen-Probe PACE II. Sociodemographic data and sexually transmitted disease risk behavior were also collected from patient charts and analyzed. The population comprised young adolescents (mean age 17.7) who were sexually active (77.1% had one or more partners in the last 3 months) with a relatively long duration of sexual activity (mean 2.8 years). The prevalence rates of cervical C. trachomatis infection diagnosed by Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II were 7.9 and 9.0%, respectively. Patients testing positive for C. trachomatis had a significant percentage of Pap smears with inflammatory results (p < 0.005). After initial testing, Amplicor had a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 93.3%, whereas Gen-Probe PACE II had a sensitivity of 99.4% and a specificity of 98.3%. After discrepant analysis, Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II had an equal sensitivity of 93.7%; the specificities were 100 and 98.8%, respectively. However, Gen-Probe PACE II had a 1% false-positive rate. Both Amplicor and Gen-Probe PACE II are highly sensitive. However, Amplicor is more specific and can be used as a confirmatory test. Either test for C. trachomatis may be indicated in patients with abnormal Pap smears.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Gynecology: An Illustrated Guide for Surgeons Amenorrhea in Adolescents Menstruation Disorders in Adolescents Imperforate Hymen Gonadal Dysgenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1