Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

This Note examines the arbitrability of antitrust claims raised by a United States party against a foreign party and attempts to reconcile a domestic public policy against the arbitrability of antitrust claims with the mandate of the Convention. It focuses on the case law relating to this policy, as well as the Convention, and applies it to Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS: MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP. v. SOLER CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC.