辅助生殖行业的商业与监管

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Texas Law Review Pub Date : 2007-05-08 DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511802379.018
J. Robertson
{"title":"辅助生殖行业的商业与监管","authors":"J. Robertson","doi":"10.1017/CBO9780511802379.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With assisted reproduction and its many variations now firmly assimilated into medical and social practice, criticisms of that industry as unduly commercial and lacking regulation are rife. Harvard Business School Professor Debora Spar's The Baby Business (2006) takes such an approach. This essay shows that without a more focused assessment of the demand, supply, and competition factors comprising the \"market for babies,\" such criticisms are insufficiently anchored to support sound policy initiatives. It discusses six areas of current controversy - legal infrastructure, the high rate of twinning, payment for gametes and gestation, genetic screening and selection of embryos, culture of life constraints, and centralized regulation - to show that the business and commercial side of assisted reproduction should not be of primary policy concern in resolving the many local issues that the field presents.","PeriodicalId":47670,"journal":{"name":"Texas Law Review","volume":"85 1","pages":"191-207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/CBO9780511802379.018","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commerce and Regulation in the Assisted Reproduction Industry\",\"authors\":\"J. Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/CBO9780511802379.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With assisted reproduction and its many variations now firmly assimilated into medical and social practice, criticisms of that industry as unduly commercial and lacking regulation are rife. Harvard Business School Professor Debora Spar's The Baby Business (2006) takes such an approach. This essay shows that without a more focused assessment of the demand, supply, and competition factors comprising the \\\"market for babies,\\\" such criticisms are insufficiently anchored to support sound policy initiatives. It discusses six areas of current controversy - legal infrastructure, the high rate of twinning, payment for gametes and gestation, genetic screening and selection of embryos, culture of life constraints, and centralized regulation - to show that the business and commercial side of assisted reproduction should not be of primary policy concern in resolving the many local issues that the field presents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Law Review\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"191-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/CBO9780511802379.018\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802379.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802379.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

随着辅助生殖及其许多变体现已被牢牢地纳入医疗和社会实践,批评这一行业过于商业化和缺乏监管的声音十分普遍。哈佛商学院教授黛博拉·斯帕尔的《婴儿生意》(2006)就采用了这种方法。本文表明,如果没有对构成“婴儿市场”的需求、供应和竞争因素进行更有针对性的评估,这些批评就不足以支持合理的政策举措。它讨论了目前有争议的六个领域——法律基础设施、高双胞胎率、配子和妊娠的支付、胚胎的遗传筛选和选择、生命约束的培养和集中监管——以表明在解决该领域提出的许多地方问题时,商业和商业方面不应成为主要的政策关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commerce and Regulation in the Assisted Reproduction Industry
With assisted reproduction and its many variations now firmly assimilated into medical and social practice, criticisms of that industry as unduly commercial and lacking regulation are rife. Harvard Business School Professor Debora Spar's The Baby Business (2006) takes such an approach. This essay shows that without a more focused assessment of the demand, supply, and competition factors comprising the "market for babies," such criticisms are insufficiently anchored to support sound policy initiatives. It discusses six areas of current controversy - legal infrastructure, the high rate of twinning, payment for gametes and gestation, genetic screening and selection of embryos, culture of life constraints, and centralized regulation - to show that the business and commercial side of assisted reproduction should not be of primary policy concern in resolving the many local issues that the field presents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Texas Law Review is a national and international leader in legal scholarship. Texas Law Review is an independent journal, edited and published entirely by students at the University of Texas School of Law. Our seven issues per year contain articles by professors, judges, and practitioners; reviews of important recent books from recognized experts, essays, commentaries; and student written notes. Texas Law Review is currently the ninth most cited legal periodical in federal and state cases in the United States and the thirteenth most cited by legal journals.
期刊最新文献
Guarantor of Last Resort Demystifying Nationwide Injunctions Feminism and the Tournament Tracing Equity: Realizing and Allocating Value in Chapter 11 State Public-Law Litigation in an Age of Polarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1