同质测量仪器可靠性系数的估计及置信区间的形成

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.1027/1614-2241/A000036
Ken Kelley, Ying Cheng
{"title":"同质测量仪器可靠性系数的估计及置信区间的形成","authors":"Ken Kelley, Ying Cheng","doi":"10.1027/1614-2241/A000036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reliability of a composite score is a fundamental and important topic in the social and behavioral sciences. The most commonly used reliability estimate of a composite score is coefficient a. However, under regularity conditions, the population value of coefficient a is only a lower bound on the population reliability, unless the items are essentially s-equivalent, an assumption that is likely violated in most applications. A generalization of coefficient a, termed x, is discussed and generally recommended. Furthermore, a point estimate itself almost certainly differs from the population value. Therefore, it is important to provide confidence interval limits so as not to overinterpret the point estimate. Analytic and bootstrap methods are described in detail for confidence interval construction for x .W e go on to recommend the bias-corrected bootstrap approach for x and provide open source and freely available R functions via the MBESS package to implement the methods discussed.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of and Confidence Interval Formation for Reliability Coefficients of Homogeneous Measurement Instruments\",\"authors\":\"Ken Kelley, Ying Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1614-2241/A000036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reliability of a composite score is a fundamental and important topic in the social and behavioral sciences. The most commonly used reliability estimate of a composite score is coefficient a. However, under regularity conditions, the population value of coefficient a is only a lower bound on the population reliability, unless the items are essentially s-equivalent, an assumption that is likely violated in most applications. A generalization of coefficient a, termed x, is discussed and generally recommended. Furthermore, a point estimate itself almost certainly differs from the population value. Therefore, it is important to provide confidence interval limits so as not to overinterpret the point estimate. Analytic and bootstrap methods are described in detail for confidence interval construction for x .W e go on to recommend the bias-corrected bootstrap approach for x and provide open source and freely available R functions via the MBESS package to implement the methods discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/A000036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/A000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

综合分数的可靠性是社会和行为科学中一个基本而重要的课题。综合分数最常用的可靠性估计是系数a。然而,在规则条件下,系数a的总体值只是总体可靠性的下界,除非项目本质上是s等效的,这一假设在大多数应用中可能被违反。讨论并推荐系数A的一般化,称为x。此外,点估计值本身几乎肯定不同于总体值。因此,重要的是提供置信区间限制,以免过度解释点估计。详细描述了分析方法和自举方法用于x的置信区间构造。我们继续推荐x的偏差校正自举方法,并通过MBESS包提供开源和免费可用的R函数来实现所讨论的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of and Confidence Interval Formation for Reliability Coefficients of Homogeneous Measurement Instruments
The reliability of a composite score is a fundamental and important topic in the social and behavioral sciences. The most commonly used reliability estimate of a composite score is coefficient a. However, under regularity conditions, the population value of coefficient a is only a lower bound on the population reliability, unless the items are essentially s-equivalent, an assumption that is likely violated in most applications. A generalization of coefficient a, termed x, is discussed and generally recommended. Furthermore, a point estimate itself almost certainly differs from the population value. Therefore, it is important to provide confidence interval limits so as not to overinterpret the point estimate. Analytic and bootstrap methods are described in detail for confidence interval construction for x .W e go on to recommend the bias-corrected bootstrap approach for x and provide open source and freely available R functions via the MBESS package to implement the methods discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1