三是索福克勒斯的风景画

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Cambridge Classical Journal Pub Date : 1984-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S0068673500004594
A. Brown
{"title":"三是索福克勒斯的风景画","authors":"A. Brown","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500004594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I wish to argue, firstly, that the words τρeῖς δὲ καὶ σκηνογραφίαν Σοφοκλῆς at Poetics 1449a18-19 were not written by Aristotle; secondly that Sophocles is unlikely to have used scene-painting in our sense of the term. These two propositions are not interdependent, but do lend support to one another.IThe deletion of τρeῖς δὲ καὶ σκηνογραφίαν Σοφοκλῆς was first proposed by G. F. Else. Few scholars have taken the deletion seriously (it is ignored in Lucas's edition), though it is cautiously revived by O. Taplin, who remarks that Else ‘brackets the words for a mixture of good and bad reasons’. That is my view also, but I believe that the bad reasons can be replaced with better ones.A complicating factor is that Else also brackets the words that follow, from ἔτι δὲ τὸ μέγeθος to ἀπeσeμνύνθη, though he regards this as a largely separate issue. He may be right in this latter deletion; the difficulty of reconciling the development of tragedy ἐκ σατυρικοῦ with what Aristotle says elsewhere is certainly real enough.","PeriodicalId":53950,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Classical Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0068673500004594","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three and scene-painting Sophocles\",\"authors\":\"A. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0068673500004594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I wish to argue, firstly, that the words τρeῖς δὲ καὶ σκηνογραφίαν Σοφοκλῆς at Poetics 1449a18-19 were not written by Aristotle; secondly that Sophocles is unlikely to have used scene-painting in our sense of the term. These two propositions are not interdependent, but do lend support to one another.IThe deletion of τρeῖς δὲ καὶ σκηνογραφίαν Σοφοκλῆς was first proposed by G. F. Else. Few scholars have taken the deletion seriously (it is ignored in Lucas's edition), though it is cautiously revived by O. Taplin, who remarks that Else ‘brackets the words for a mixture of good and bad reasons’. That is my view also, but I believe that the bad reasons can be replaced with better ones.A complicating factor is that Else also brackets the words that follow, from ἔτι δὲ τὸ μέγeθος to ἀπeσeμνύνθη, though he regards this as a largely separate issue. He may be right in this latter deletion; the difficulty of reconciling the development of tragedy ἐκ σατυρικοῦ with what Aristotle says elsewhere is certainly real enough.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Classical Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0068673500004594\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Classical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500004594\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Classical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500004594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

首先,我想指出,在《诗学》1449a18-19中,τρ ρα ς δ ι κα ς σκηνογραφ小树出αν Σοφοκλ ο ς这几个词并不是亚里士多德写的;其次,索福克勒斯不太可能使用我们所理解的风景画。这两种主张并不相互依赖,但确实相互支持。是不是删除τρeῖςδὲκαὶσκηνογραφίανΣοφοκλῆς首次提出了g f。很少有学者认真对待这一删节(在卢卡斯的版本中被忽略了),尽管O. Taplin小心翼翼地恢复了这一删节,他评论说Else“把单词加括号是有好有坏的原因”。这也是我的观点,但我相信坏的理由可以被更好的理由所取代。一个复杂的因素是Else还把后面的单词括起来,从τι δ ι τ - μ γeθος到π σeμν η,尽管他认为这是一个很大程度上独立的问题。后一种删减也许是对的;悲剧的发展与亚里士多德在别处所说的相协调的困难,当然是足够真实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three and scene-painting Sophocles
I wish to argue, firstly, that the words τρeῖς δὲ καὶ σκηνογραφίαν Σοφοκλῆς at Poetics 1449a18-19 were not written by Aristotle; secondly that Sophocles is unlikely to have used scene-painting in our sense of the term. These two propositions are not interdependent, but do lend support to one another.IThe deletion of τρeῖς δὲ καὶ σκηνογραφίαν Σοφοκλῆς was first proposed by G. F. Else. Few scholars have taken the deletion seriously (it is ignored in Lucas's edition), though it is cautiously revived by O. Taplin, who remarks that Else ‘brackets the words for a mixture of good and bad reasons’. That is my view also, but I believe that the bad reasons can be replaced with better ones.A complicating factor is that Else also brackets the words that follow, from ἔτι δὲ τὸ μέγeθος to ἀπeσeμνύνθη, though he regards this as a largely separate issue. He may be right in this latter deletion; the difficulty of reconciling the development of tragedy ἐκ σατυρικοῦ with what Aristotle says elsewhere is certainly real enough.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Dual Mobility Cups as the Routine Choice in Total Hip Arthroplasty. THE VIEW FROM THE MOUNTAIN (OROSKOPIA) IN GREEK AND LATIN LITERATURE TWO NOTES ON DARIUS III FOOLS RUSH IN: SEX, ‘THE MEAN’ AND EPICUREANISM IN HORACE, SATIRES 1.2 TALISMANIC PRACTICE AT LEFKANDI: TRINKETS, BURIALS AND BELIEF IN THE EARLY IRON AGE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1