A. Appelt1, F.-X. Huber1, K. DaFonseca1, P. Meeder1
{"title":"帕西酮对外部性骨质合成是否依然流行?1","authors":"A. Appelt1, F.-X. Huber1, K. DaFonseca1, P. Meeder1","doi":"10.1055/s-2005-865739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the age of outstanding internal implants and techniques for operative treatment of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures the usefulness of the external fixator (e.f.) has to be called into question. Substantial advantages of e.f. especially in this location are excellent protection of soft tissues, easy enlargement to adjacent joints and supplementary stabilization of metaphyseal comminuted fractures.","PeriodicalId":75462,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Traumatologie","volume":"35 1","pages":"140 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-865739","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ist die Fixateur-externe-Osteosynthese an der proximalen Tibia noch zeitgemäß?1\",\"authors\":\"A. Appelt1, F.-X. Huber1, K. DaFonseca1, P. Meeder1\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2005-865739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the age of outstanding internal implants and techniques for operative treatment of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures the usefulness of the external fixator (e.f.) has to be called into question. Substantial advantages of e.f. especially in this location are excellent protection of soft tissues, easy enlargement to adjacent joints and supplementary stabilization of metaphyseal comminuted fractures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aktuelle Traumatologie\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"140 - 145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-865739\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aktuelle Traumatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-865739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-865739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ist die Fixateur-externe-Osteosynthese an der proximalen Tibia noch zeitgemäß?1
In the age of outstanding internal implants and techniques for operative treatment of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures the usefulness of the external fixator (e.f.) has to be called into question. Substantial advantages of e.f. especially in this location are excellent protection of soft tissues, easy enlargement to adjacent joints and supplementary stabilization of metaphyseal comminuted fractures.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
