{"title":"关于语义-语用循环的一些思考","authors":"Salvador Pons Bordería, Ana Llopis Cardona","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00046.pon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores novel ways to consider semantic–pragmatic cycles using a dual strategy: an inwards strategy, whereby\n the distinctive traits of a pragmatic cycle are established, and an outwards strategy, whereby the categories that delimit\n semantic–pragmatic cycles are described. The result of this exploration is the distinction between “pragmatic cycle”, “replication”,\n “concomitance” and “paradigmatic increase” as four different yet related processes. In addition, this study integrates Construction Grammar\n into the description of each process and shows that the study of semantic–pragmatic cycles can benefit from a constructional approach,\n adopting Traugott and Trousdale’s (2013) and Traugott’s\n (2018) models, and including concepts from European structuralism, particularly the notions of “paradigm”, “diasystem” and\n “functional language” (“lengua funcional”).","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some reflections on semantic–pragmatic cycles\",\"authors\":\"Salvador Pons Bordería, Ana Llopis Cardona\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00046.pon\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores novel ways to consider semantic–pragmatic cycles using a dual strategy: an inwards strategy, whereby\\n the distinctive traits of a pragmatic cycle are established, and an outwards strategy, whereby the categories that delimit\\n semantic–pragmatic cycles are described. The result of this exploration is the distinction between “pragmatic cycle”, “replication”,\\n “concomitance” and “paradigmatic increase” as four different yet related processes. In addition, this study integrates Construction Grammar\\n into the description of each process and shows that the study of semantic–pragmatic cycles can benefit from a constructional approach,\\n adopting Traugott and Trousdale’s (2013) and Traugott’s\\n (2018) models, and including concepts from European structuralism, particularly the notions of “paradigm”, “diasystem” and\\n “functional language” (“lengua funcional”).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00046.pon\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00046.pon","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper explores novel ways to consider semantic–pragmatic cycles using a dual strategy: an inwards strategy, whereby
the distinctive traits of a pragmatic cycle are established, and an outwards strategy, whereby the categories that delimit
semantic–pragmatic cycles are described. The result of this exploration is the distinction between “pragmatic cycle”, “replication”,
“concomitance” and “paradigmatic increase” as four different yet related processes. In addition, this study integrates Construction Grammar
into the description of each process and shows that the study of semantic–pragmatic cycles can benefit from a constructional approach,
adopting Traugott and Trousdale’s (2013) and Traugott’s
(2018) models, and including concepts from European structuralism, particularly the notions of “paradigm”, “diasystem” and
“functional language” (“lengua funcional”).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.