关于语义-语用循环的一些思考

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Historical Pragmatics Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1075/jhp.00046.pon
Salvador Pons Bordería, Ana Llopis Cardona
{"title":"关于语义-语用循环的一些思考","authors":"Salvador Pons Bordería, Ana Llopis Cardona","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00046.pon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores novel ways to consider semantic–pragmatic cycles using a dual strategy: an inwards strategy, whereby\n the distinctive traits of a pragmatic cycle are established, and an outwards strategy, whereby the categories that delimit\n semantic–pragmatic cycles are described. The result of this exploration is the distinction between “pragmatic cycle”, “replication”,\n “concomitance” and “paradigmatic increase” as four different yet related processes. In addition, this study integrates Construction Grammar\n into the description of each process and shows that the study of semantic–pragmatic cycles can benefit from a constructional approach,\n adopting Traugott and Trousdale’s (2013) and Traugott’s\n (2018) models, and including concepts from European structuralism, particularly the notions of “paradigm”, “diasystem” and\n “functional language” (“lengua funcional”).","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some reflections on semantic–pragmatic cycles\",\"authors\":\"Salvador Pons Bordería, Ana Llopis Cardona\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00046.pon\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores novel ways to consider semantic–pragmatic cycles using a dual strategy: an inwards strategy, whereby\\n the distinctive traits of a pragmatic cycle are established, and an outwards strategy, whereby the categories that delimit\\n semantic–pragmatic cycles are described. The result of this exploration is the distinction between “pragmatic cycle”, “replication”,\\n “concomitance” and “paradigmatic increase” as four different yet related processes. In addition, this study integrates Construction Grammar\\n into the description of each process and shows that the study of semantic–pragmatic cycles can benefit from a constructional approach,\\n adopting Traugott and Trousdale’s (2013) and Traugott’s\\n (2018) models, and including concepts from European structuralism, particularly the notions of “paradigm”, “diasystem” and\\n “functional language” (“lengua funcional”).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00046.pon\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00046.pon","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探索了使用双重策略来考虑语义-语用循环的新方法:一种是内向策略,即建立语用循环的独特特征,另一种是外向策略,即描述划分语义-语用循环的类别。这一探索的结果是区分了“语用循环”、“复制”、“伴随”和“范式增长”这四个不同但又相关的过程。此外,本研究将建构语法整合到每个过程的描述中,并表明语义-语用循环的研究可以受益于建构方法,采用Traugott和Trousdale(2013)和Traugott(2018)的模型,并包括来自欧洲结构主义的概念,特别是“范式”、“反系统”和“功能语言”(“lengua functional”)的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some reflections on semantic–pragmatic cycles
This paper explores novel ways to consider semantic–pragmatic cycles using a dual strategy: an inwards strategy, whereby the distinctive traits of a pragmatic cycle are established, and an outwards strategy, whereby the categories that delimit semantic–pragmatic cycles are described. The result of this exploration is the distinction between “pragmatic cycle”, “replication”, “concomitance” and “paradigmatic increase” as four different yet related processes. In addition, this study integrates Construction Grammar into the description of each process and shows that the study of semantic–pragmatic cycles can benefit from a constructional approach, adopting Traugott and Trousdale’s (2013) and Traugott’s (2018) models, and including concepts from European structuralism, particularly the notions of “paradigm”, “diasystem” and “functional language” (“lengua funcional”).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
期刊最新文献
Women’s voices in the public sphere Democratisation Colloquialisation A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard Speaking for the downtrodden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1