选择写作前处理:对五年级学生说明文的影响

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220979909598491
Bruce Brodney, Carolyn Reeves, R. Kazelskis
{"title":"选择写作前处理:对五年级学生说明文的影响","authors":"Bruce Brodney, Carolyn Reeves, R. Kazelskis","doi":"10.1080/00220979909598491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The influence of prewriting treatments on the quality of written discourse produced by 5th-grade students was the central focus of this research. Students received 1 of 4 prewriting treatments: reading paired with prewriting, prewriting-only, reading-only, or neither reading nor prewriting. Differences in the quality of the students' compositions were examined on the basis of scores obtained from a T-unit measure, a holistic rubric, and an analytic measure. The study included 5 classes of 5th-grade students randomly assigned to classes at the beginning of the school year. Four classes (n = 96) were randomly designated as treatment groups, and the 5th class (n = 24) served as a pilot group. A significant (p < .001) multivariate F-ratio indicated that type of prewriting treatment significantly affected scores on expository compositions. Reading paired with prewriting before composing was found to be the most effective prewriting instructional strategy.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"5-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598491","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selected Prewriting Treatments: Effects on Expository Compositions Written by Fifth-Grade Students\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Brodney, Carolyn Reeves, R. Kazelskis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220979909598491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The influence of prewriting treatments on the quality of written discourse produced by 5th-grade students was the central focus of this research. Students received 1 of 4 prewriting treatments: reading paired with prewriting, prewriting-only, reading-only, or neither reading nor prewriting. Differences in the quality of the students' compositions were examined on the basis of scores obtained from a T-unit measure, a holistic rubric, and an analytic measure. The study included 5 classes of 5th-grade students randomly assigned to classes at the beginning of the school year. Four classes (n = 96) were randomly designated as treatment groups, and the 5th class (n = 24) served as a pilot group. A significant (p < .001) multivariate F-ratio indicated that type of prewriting treatment significantly affected scores on expository compositions. Reading paired with prewriting before composing was found to be the most effective prewriting instructional strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"5-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598491\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598491\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

摘要本研究主要探讨写作前处理对五年级学生书面语篇质量的影响。学生们接受了四种预写处理中的一种:阅读搭配预写、只预写、只阅读或既不阅读也不预写。学生作文质量的差异是根据从t单位测量、整体标题和分析测量中获得的分数来检查的。这项研究包括5个班的五年级学生,他们在学年开始时被随机分配到不同的班级。随机选取4个班(n = 96)作为治疗组,第5个班(n = 24)作为试验组。一个显著的(p < 0.001)多变量f比表明写作前治疗的类型显著影响说明文作文的得分。写作前阅读与写作前写作相结合是最有效的写作前教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selected Prewriting Treatments: Effects on Expository Compositions Written by Fifth-Grade Students
Abstract The influence of prewriting treatments on the quality of written discourse produced by 5th-grade students was the central focus of this research. Students received 1 of 4 prewriting treatments: reading paired with prewriting, prewriting-only, reading-only, or neither reading nor prewriting. Differences in the quality of the students' compositions were examined on the basis of scores obtained from a T-unit measure, a holistic rubric, and an analytic measure. The study included 5 classes of 5th-grade students randomly assigned to classes at the beginning of the school year. Four classes (n = 96) were randomly designated as treatment groups, and the 5th class (n = 24) served as a pilot group. A significant (p < .001) multivariate F-ratio indicated that type of prewriting treatment significantly affected scores on expository compositions. Reading paired with prewriting before composing was found to be the most effective prewriting instructional strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1