罗马共和国和帝国早期公共工程合同中承包商的保护

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of Legal History Pub Date : 2004-12-01 DOI:10.1080/0144036042000290735
P. Du Plessis
{"title":"罗马共和国和帝国早期公共工程合同中承包商的保护","authors":"P. Du Plessis","doi":"10.1080/0144036042000290735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of contractors to build and maintain public works in Rome and the provinces is a common feature of Roman building practice in the Republic and early Principate. It reflects a general tendency in Roman republican administration (also found in other sectors such as tax-farming) to let out state business to private entrepreneurs. While the extant sources frequently mention the use of contractors in public works contracts, most references do not describe the internal working of these contracts or (to use the terminology of Roman private law) the rights and duties of the parties involved. This article examines selected references to public works contracts in legal and literary sources in an attempt to clarify a single aspect of the contractual relationship between the state and an individual. The purpose of this survey is to establish whether the sources allude to any form of legal protection available to a contractor in his dealings with Roman magistrates in the context of public works contracts.","PeriodicalId":43796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal History","volume":"25 1","pages":"287 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0144036042000290735","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The protection of the contractor in public works contracts in the Roman Republic and Early Empire\",\"authors\":\"P. Du Plessis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0144036042000290735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of contractors to build and maintain public works in Rome and the provinces is a common feature of Roman building practice in the Republic and early Principate. It reflects a general tendency in Roman republican administration (also found in other sectors such as tax-farming) to let out state business to private entrepreneurs. While the extant sources frequently mention the use of contractors in public works contracts, most references do not describe the internal working of these contracts or (to use the terminology of Roman private law) the rights and duties of the parties involved. This article examines selected references to public works contracts in legal and literary sources in an attempt to clarify a single aspect of the contractual relationship between the state and an individual. The purpose of this survey is to establish whether the sources allude to any form of legal protection available to a contractor in his dealings with Roman magistrates in the context of public works contracts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"287 - 314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0144036042000290735\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0144036042000290735\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0144036042000290735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在罗马和行省,使用承包商来建造和维护公共工程是共和时期和早期元首制时期罗马建筑实践的一个共同特征。这反映了罗马共和政府(也存在于其他部门,如税收农业)将国有企业交给私人企业家的总体趋势。虽然现存的资料经常提到承包商在公共工程合同中的使用,但大多数参考文献并没有描述这些合同的内部工作或(使用罗马私法的术语)所涉及的各方的权利和义务。本文考察了法律和文学资料中有关公共工程合同的精选参考文献,试图澄清国家与个人之间合同关系的一个方面。本调查的目的是确定资料来源是否暗示承包商在公共工程合同的背景下与罗马地方官员打交道时可获得任何形式的法律保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The protection of the contractor in public works contracts in the Roman Republic and Early Empire
The use of contractors to build and maintain public works in Rome and the provinces is a common feature of Roman building practice in the Republic and early Principate. It reflects a general tendency in Roman republican administration (also found in other sectors such as tax-farming) to let out state business to private entrepreneurs. While the extant sources frequently mention the use of contractors in public works contracts, most references do not describe the internal working of these contracts or (to use the terminology of Roman private law) the rights and duties of the parties involved. This article examines selected references to public works contracts in legal and literary sources in an attempt to clarify a single aspect of the contractual relationship between the state and an individual. The purpose of this survey is to establish whether the sources allude to any form of legal protection available to a contractor in his dealings with Roman magistrates in the context of public works contracts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal History, founded in 1980, is the only British journal concerned solely with legal history. It publishes articles in English on the sources and development of the common law, both in the British Isles and overseas, on the history of the laws of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and on Roman Law and the European legal tradition. There is a section for shorter research notes, review-articles, and a wide-ranging section of reviews of recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Custom, Law, and Monarchy: A Legal History of Early Modern France Custom, Law, and Monarchy: A Legal History of Early Modern France , by Marie Seong-Hak Kim, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, v + 246pp, £75 (hardback), ISBN: 9780192845498 Fraud, Trusts and Trusting: Enforcing Crown Forfeitures in Equity, c. 1570–1620 The Forgotten History of Bankruptcy, 1543–1624 Better than Just Fine: Combining Final Concords with Documentary and Symbolic Practices Armed with Sword and Scales: Law, Culture, and Local Courtrooms in London, 1860-1913 Armed with Sword and Scales: Law, Culture, and Local Courtrooms in London, 1860-1913 , by Sascha Auerbach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2021, xxii + 403 pp, £75 (hardback), ISBN 9781108491556
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1