执政的参议院决议中的俄国农民意志(1861-1906)

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of Legal History Pub Date : 1999-08-01 DOI:10.1080/01440362008539589
Gareth Popkins
{"title":"执政的参议院决议中的俄国农民意志(1861-1906)","authors":"Gareth Popkins","doi":"10.1080/01440362008539589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article investigates the law of testation as it applied to the peasantry of late Imperial Russia. After a summary of the main features of the written law of wills, there follows an outline of the special position of the villagers. They had distinctive rights over property, granted as part of the emancipation legislation 1861, and also access to a simplified procedure for making a will. The investigation then turns to the case law of the high court or ‘Ruling Senate’. It emerges that Senate decisions generally emphasised and reinforced the distinctiveness of the peasantry's legal position. However, it is also clear that the ambiguity inherent in the status of the post-emancipation peasants meant that their use of wills became a cause of controversy in the village, in the courts, and amongst academic lawyers. While comparative jurists will be interested in the description of tsarist laws on inheritance, wills, the peasant estate, and the court system per se, the subject is also of wider histor...","PeriodicalId":43796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal History","volume":"45 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440362008539589","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russian Peasant Wills in the Decisions of the Ruling Senate, 1861–1906\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Popkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01440362008539589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article investigates the law of testation as it applied to the peasantry of late Imperial Russia. After a summary of the main features of the written law of wills, there follows an outline of the special position of the villagers. They had distinctive rights over property, granted as part of the emancipation legislation 1861, and also access to a simplified procedure for making a will. The investigation then turns to the case law of the high court or ‘Ruling Senate’. It emerges that Senate decisions generally emphasised and reinforced the distinctiveness of the peasantry's legal position. However, it is also clear that the ambiguity inherent in the status of the post-emancipation peasants meant that their use of wills became a cause of controversy in the village, in the courts, and amongst academic lawyers. While comparative jurists will be interested in the description of tsarist laws on inheritance, wills, the peasant estate, and the court system per se, the subject is also of wider histor...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440362008539589\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440362008539589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440362008539589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文考察了俄国帝国晚期对农民适用的证言法。在总结了遗嘱成文法的主要特点之后,对村民的特殊地位进行了概述。作为1861年解放奴隶法案的一部分,他们对财产拥有独特的权利,也可以使用简化的程序来立遗嘱。然后调查转向高等法院或“统治参议院”的判例法。由此可见,元老院的决定普遍强调并强化了农民法律地位的独特性。然而,同样清楚的是,解放后农民地位固有的模糊性意味着他们对遗嘱的使用成为村里、法庭和学术律师之间争议的原因。虽然比较法学家会对沙皇关于继承、遗嘱、农民财产和法院系统本身的法律的描述感兴趣,但这个主题也涉及更广泛的历史……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Russian Peasant Wills in the Decisions of the Ruling Senate, 1861–1906
Abstract This article investigates the law of testation as it applied to the peasantry of late Imperial Russia. After a summary of the main features of the written law of wills, there follows an outline of the special position of the villagers. They had distinctive rights over property, granted as part of the emancipation legislation 1861, and also access to a simplified procedure for making a will. The investigation then turns to the case law of the high court or ‘Ruling Senate’. It emerges that Senate decisions generally emphasised and reinforced the distinctiveness of the peasantry's legal position. However, it is also clear that the ambiguity inherent in the status of the post-emancipation peasants meant that their use of wills became a cause of controversy in the village, in the courts, and amongst academic lawyers. While comparative jurists will be interested in the description of tsarist laws on inheritance, wills, the peasant estate, and the court system per se, the subject is also of wider histor...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal History, founded in 1980, is the only British journal concerned solely with legal history. It publishes articles in English on the sources and development of the common law, both in the British Isles and overseas, on the history of the laws of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and on Roman Law and the European legal tradition. There is a section for shorter research notes, review-articles, and a wide-ranging section of reviews of recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Custom, Law, and Monarchy: A Legal History of Early Modern France Custom, Law, and Monarchy: A Legal History of Early Modern France , by Marie Seong-Hak Kim, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, v + 246pp, £75 (hardback), ISBN: 9780192845498 Fraud, Trusts and Trusting: Enforcing Crown Forfeitures in Equity, c. 1570–1620 The Forgotten History of Bankruptcy, 1543–1624 Better than Just Fine: Combining Final Concords with Documentary and Symbolic Practices Armed with Sword and Scales: Law, Culture, and Local Courtrooms in London, 1860-1913 Armed with Sword and Scales: Law, Culture, and Local Courtrooms in London, 1860-1913 , by Sascha Auerbach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2021, xxii + 403 pp, £75 (hardback), ISBN 9781108491556
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1