{"title":"执政的参议院决议中的俄国农民意志(1861-1906)","authors":"Gareth Popkins","doi":"10.1080/01440362008539589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article investigates the law of testation as it applied to the peasantry of late Imperial Russia. After a summary of the main features of the written law of wills, there follows an outline of the special position of the villagers. They had distinctive rights over property, granted as part of the emancipation legislation 1861, and also access to a simplified procedure for making a will. The investigation then turns to the case law of the high court or ‘Ruling Senate’. It emerges that Senate decisions generally emphasised and reinforced the distinctiveness of the peasantry's legal position. However, it is also clear that the ambiguity inherent in the status of the post-emancipation peasants meant that their use of wills became a cause of controversy in the village, in the courts, and amongst academic lawyers. While comparative jurists will be interested in the description of tsarist laws on inheritance, wills, the peasant estate, and the court system per se, the subject is also of wider histor...","PeriodicalId":43796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal History","volume":"45 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440362008539589","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russian Peasant Wills in the Decisions of the Ruling Senate, 1861–1906\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Popkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01440362008539589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article investigates the law of testation as it applied to the peasantry of late Imperial Russia. After a summary of the main features of the written law of wills, there follows an outline of the special position of the villagers. They had distinctive rights over property, granted as part of the emancipation legislation 1861, and also access to a simplified procedure for making a will. The investigation then turns to the case law of the high court or ‘Ruling Senate’. It emerges that Senate decisions generally emphasised and reinforced the distinctiveness of the peasantry's legal position. However, it is also clear that the ambiguity inherent in the status of the post-emancipation peasants meant that their use of wills became a cause of controversy in the village, in the courts, and amongst academic lawyers. While comparative jurists will be interested in the description of tsarist laws on inheritance, wills, the peasant estate, and the court system per se, the subject is also of wider histor...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440362008539589\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440362008539589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440362008539589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Russian Peasant Wills in the Decisions of the Ruling Senate, 1861–1906
Abstract This article investigates the law of testation as it applied to the peasantry of late Imperial Russia. After a summary of the main features of the written law of wills, there follows an outline of the special position of the villagers. They had distinctive rights over property, granted as part of the emancipation legislation 1861, and also access to a simplified procedure for making a will. The investigation then turns to the case law of the high court or ‘Ruling Senate’. It emerges that Senate decisions generally emphasised and reinforced the distinctiveness of the peasantry's legal position. However, it is also clear that the ambiguity inherent in the status of the post-emancipation peasants meant that their use of wills became a cause of controversy in the village, in the courts, and amongst academic lawyers. While comparative jurists will be interested in the description of tsarist laws on inheritance, wills, the peasant estate, and the court system per se, the subject is also of wider histor...
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Legal History, founded in 1980, is the only British journal concerned solely with legal history. It publishes articles in English on the sources and development of the common law, both in the British Isles and overseas, on the history of the laws of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and on Roman Law and the European legal tradition. There is a section for shorter research notes, review-articles, and a wide-ranging section of reviews of recent literature.