南非政党政治中的派系和派系主义——评价(de)优点

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politikon Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI:10.1080/02589346.2021.1913553
M. Kanyane
{"title":"南非政党政治中的派系和派系主义——评价(de)优点","authors":"M. Kanyane","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2021.1913553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Faction is an old age phenomenon world over. The democratic consolidation in South Africa post 1994 is close to three decades but did not escape factionalism. Does faction phenomenon bring about havoc, conflicts, splits, and instability corollaries or strengthen party politics in response to fulfilling the general will? In responding to this question, South African party politics and factional battles within the ruling party and other political formations are discussed as a case study to explore the merits and demerits of factions and factionalism. In doing this, a discourse analysis was undertaken to understand how faction phenomenon brings about complots or a positive change. The discourse analysed arrived to the conclusion that whilst factions are blatantly criticised for rearing havoc and instability in party politics as well as signs of split-offs and threats as demerits in South Africa, there are also inevitable trade-offs to be welcomed as merits to create opportunities to drive positive change within the broader party-political spectrum to strengthen participatory democracy and the multi-party system in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":45047,"journal":{"name":"Politikon","volume":"48 1","pages":"572 - 588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913553","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factions and Factionalism in South African Party Politics – Appraising (de)Merits\",\"authors\":\"M. Kanyane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589346.2021.1913553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Faction is an old age phenomenon world over. The democratic consolidation in South Africa post 1994 is close to three decades but did not escape factionalism. Does faction phenomenon bring about havoc, conflicts, splits, and instability corollaries or strengthen party politics in response to fulfilling the general will? In responding to this question, South African party politics and factional battles within the ruling party and other political formations are discussed as a case study to explore the merits and demerits of factions and factionalism. In doing this, a discourse analysis was undertaken to understand how faction phenomenon brings about complots or a positive change. The discourse analysed arrived to the conclusion that whilst factions are blatantly criticised for rearing havoc and instability in party politics as well as signs of split-offs and threats as demerits in South Africa, there are also inevitable trade-offs to be welcomed as merits to create opportunities to drive positive change within the broader party-political spectrum to strengthen participatory democracy and the multi-party system in South Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politikon\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"572 - 588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913553\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politikon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913553\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politikon","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913553","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

派系是一个世界性的古老现象。1994年以后,南非的民主巩固已经持续了近30年,但并没有摆脱派系斗争。派系现象是带来浩劫、冲突、分裂和不稳定的必然结果,还是为了满足公意而加强政党政治?在回答这个问题时,南非的政党政治和执政党和其他政治组织内部的派系斗争作为一个案例研究来探讨派系和派系主义的优缺点。在此过程中,进行了话语分析,以了解派系现象如何带来阴谋或积极的变化。通过分析得出的结论是,在南非,虽然各派因在政党政治中制造混乱和不稳定以及分裂和威胁的迹象而受到公然批评,但也有不可避免的权衡作为优点受到欢迎,可以创造机会,在更广泛的政党政治范围内推动积极的变化,以加强南非的参与式民主和多党制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factions and Factionalism in South African Party Politics – Appraising (de)Merits
ABSTRACT Faction is an old age phenomenon world over. The democratic consolidation in South Africa post 1994 is close to three decades but did not escape factionalism. Does faction phenomenon bring about havoc, conflicts, splits, and instability corollaries or strengthen party politics in response to fulfilling the general will? In responding to this question, South African party politics and factional battles within the ruling party and other political formations are discussed as a case study to explore the merits and demerits of factions and factionalism. In doing this, a discourse analysis was undertaken to understand how faction phenomenon brings about complots or a positive change. The discourse analysed arrived to the conclusion that whilst factions are blatantly criticised for rearing havoc and instability in party politics as well as signs of split-offs and threats as demerits in South Africa, there are also inevitable trade-offs to be welcomed as merits to create opportunities to drive positive change within the broader party-political spectrum to strengthen participatory democracy and the multi-party system in South Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politikon
Politikon POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Politikon focuses primarily on South African politics, but not exclusively so. Over the years the journal has published articles by some of the world" leading political scientists, including Arend Lijphart, Samuel Huntingdon, and Philippe Schmitter. It has also featured important contributions from South Africa"s leading political philosophers, political scientists and international relations experts. It has proved an influential journal, particularly in debates over the merits of South Africa"s constitutional reforms (in 1983 and 1994). In the last few years special issues have focused on women and politics in South Africa, and the South African election of 1999.
期刊最新文献
Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries , by, Simon David Taylor, London, Routledge, May 2022, 248pp., £130.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781351065467 Amin’s progressive internationalism EU sanctions on Zimbabwe: rethinking Africa’s economic and political security in the global age Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa Between Samir Amin and Claude Ake: towards a roadmap for Africa’s development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1