{"title":"指定新石器时代晚期巴斯亚诺沃考古建筑群的依据","authors":"A. Shorin, E. V. Vilisov, A. Shorina","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2015.1114848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses characteristics of the Bas'ianovo archeological complex from the Late Neolithic Age, discovered in Middle Transuralia [Zaural'e]. It is dated to the first half of the fourth millennium BCE and is genetically connected with the Transuralian Boborykino culture. It is premature to establish whether the Bas'ianovo archeological complex is a new archeological culture or a local variant of the Boborykino culture (province, community). It is more productive to research the issue of Boborykino archeological-cultural and historical-cultural unity (and differences) through the prism of linguistic continuity, which is familiar from ethnographic materials—above all those of the aborigines of Australia and New Guinea. This may be designated as archeological continuity.","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2015.1114848","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grounds for Designating the Late Neolithic Bas'ianovo Archeological Complex\",\"authors\":\"A. Shorin, E. V. Vilisov, A. Shorina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611959.2015.1114848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses characteristics of the Bas'ianovo archeological complex from the Late Neolithic Age, discovered in Middle Transuralia [Zaural'e]. It is dated to the first half of the fourth millennium BCE and is genetically connected with the Transuralian Boborykino culture. It is premature to establish whether the Bas'ianovo archeological complex is a new archeological culture or a local variant of the Boborykino culture (province, community). It is more productive to research the issue of Boborykino archeological-cultural and historical-cultural unity (and differences) through the prism of linguistic continuity, which is familiar from ethnographic materials—above all those of the aborigines of Australia and New Guinea. This may be designated as archeological continuity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2015.1114848\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2015.1114848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2015.1114848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Grounds for Designating the Late Neolithic Bas'ianovo Archeological Complex
The article discusses characteristics of the Bas'ianovo archeological complex from the Late Neolithic Age, discovered in Middle Transuralia [Zaural'e]. It is dated to the first half of the fourth millennium BCE and is genetically connected with the Transuralian Boborykino culture. It is premature to establish whether the Bas'ianovo archeological complex is a new archeological culture or a local variant of the Boborykino culture (province, community). It is more productive to research the issue of Boborykino archeological-cultural and historical-cultural unity (and differences) through the prism of linguistic continuity, which is familiar from ethnographic materials—above all those of the aborigines of Australia and New Guinea. This may be designated as archeological continuity.
期刊介绍:
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.