增强神经反馈效率的个体脑电图α活动分析:两个案例研究

O. Bazanova, L. Aftanas
{"title":"增强神经反馈效率的个体脑电图α活动分析:两个案例研究","authors":"O. Bazanova, L. Aftanas","doi":"10.1080/10874208.2010.501517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hypothesis was tested of whether neurofeedback training applied in order to increase or decrease power of individual EEG frequency ranges is more efficient than neurofeedback training of standard EEG frequency ranges. The sessions of decreasing the theta/beta ratio and reinforcing alpha neurofeedback training were carried out on two outpatients with attention deficit disorder (a schoolboy) and functional pain contraction (a professional musician). The neurofeedback utilizing standard EEG frequency ranges (theta 4-8, alpha 8-12, beta 13-18) was inefficient and even resulted in aggravation of symptoms in both cases. The individualized neurofeedback that utilized individual frequency ranges resulted in substantial clinical improvement.","PeriodicalId":88271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotherapy","volume":"14 1","pages":"244-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10874208.2010.501517","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual EEG Alpha Activity Analysis for Enhancement Neurofeedback Efficiency: Two Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"O. Bazanova, L. Aftanas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10874208.2010.501517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The hypothesis was tested of whether neurofeedback training applied in order to increase or decrease power of individual EEG frequency ranges is more efficient than neurofeedback training of standard EEG frequency ranges. The sessions of decreasing the theta/beta ratio and reinforcing alpha neurofeedback training were carried out on two outpatients with attention deficit disorder (a schoolboy) and functional pain contraction (a professional musician). The neurofeedback utilizing standard EEG frequency ranges (theta 4-8, alpha 8-12, beta 13-18) was inefficient and even resulted in aggravation of symptoms in both cases. The individualized neurofeedback that utilized individual frequency ranges resulted in substantial clinical improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotherapy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"244-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10874208.2010.501517\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2010.501517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2010.501517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

验证了以增加或减少单个脑电图频率范围功率为目的的神经反馈训练是否比标准脑电图频率范围的神经反馈训练更有效。对两名患有注意缺陷障碍(男学生)和功能性疼痛收缩症(职业音乐家)的门诊患者进行降低θ / β比值和强化α神经反馈训练。使用标准脑电图频率范围(θ 4-8、α 8-12、β 13-18)的神经反馈是无效的,甚至导致两例患者症状加重。利用个体频率范围的个体化神经反馈导致了显著的临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual EEG Alpha Activity Analysis for Enhancement Neurofeedback Efficiency: Two Case Studies
The hypothesis was tested of whether neurofeedback training applied in order to increase or decrease power of individual EEG frequency ranges is more efficient than neurofeedback training of standard EEG frequency ranges. The sessions of decreasing the theta/beta ratio and reinforcing alpha neurofeedback training were carried out on two outpatients with attention deficit disorder (a schoolboy) and functional pain contraction (a professional musician). The neurofeedback utilizing standard EEG frequency ranges (theta 4-8, alpha 8-12, beta 13-18) was inefficient and even resulted in aggravation of symptoms in both cases. The individualized neurofeedback that utilized individual frequency ranges resulted in substantial clinical improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields Book review: The Art of Artifacting Summaries and Abstracts of Scientific Papers Presented at the 2002 Society for Neuronal Regulation 10th Annual Conference, Scottsdale, Arizona Poster Presentation Abstracts Published online Book Review: Handbook of Mind-Body Medicine for Primary Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1