定量脑电图的效度和信度

R. Thatcher
{"title":"定量脑电图的效度和信度","authors":"R. Thatcher","doi":"10.1080/10874201003773500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reliability and validity are statistical concepts that are reviewed and then applied to the field of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). The review of the scientific literature demonstrated high levels of split-half and test–retest reliability of qEEG and convincing content and predictive validity as well as other forms of validity. QEEG is distinguished fromnonquantitative EEG (“eyeball” examination of EEG traces), with the latter showing low reliability (e.g., 0.2–0.29) and poor interrater agreement for nonepilepsy evaluation. In contrast, qEEG is greater than 0.9 reliable with as little as 40-s epochs and remains stable with high test–retest reliability over many days and weeks. Predictive validity of qEEG is established by significant and replicable correlations with clinical measures and accurate predictions of outcome and performance on neuropsychological tests. In contrast, non-qEEG or eyeball visual examination of the EEG traces in cases of nonepilepsy has essentially zero predict...","PeriodicalId":88271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotherapy","volume":"14 1","pages":"122-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10874201003773500","citationCount":"119","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of Quantitative Electroencephalography\",\"authors\":\"R. Thatcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10874201003773500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Reliability and validity are statistical concepts that are reviewed and then applied to the field of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). The review of the scientific literature demonstrated high levels of split-half and test–retest reliability of qEEG and convincing content and predictive validity as well as other forms of validity. QEEG is distinguished fromnonquantitative EEG (“eyeball” examination of EEG traces), with the latter showing low reliability (e.g., 0.2–0.29) and poor interrater agreement for nonepilepsy evaluation. In contrast, qEEG is greater than 0.9 reliable with as little as 40-s epochs and remains stable with high test–retest reliability over many days and weeks. Predictive validity of qEEG is established by significant and replicable correlations with clinical measures and accurate predictions of outcome and performance on neuropsychological tests. In contrast, non-qEEG or eyeball visual examination of the EEG traces in cases of nonepilepsy has essentially zero predict...\",\"PeriodicalId\":88271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotherapy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"122-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10874201003773500\",\"citationCount\":\"119\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10874201003773500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10874201003773500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 119

摘要

信度和效度是对统计概念的回顾,然后应用于定量脑电图(qEEG)领域。科学文献的回顾表明,qEEG具有较高的分半信度和重测信度、令人信服的内容和预测效度以及其他形式的效度。QEEG与非定量EEG(脑电图痕迹的“眼球”检查)不同,后者可靠性较低(如0.2-0.29),对非癫痫评估的判据一致性较差。相比之下,qEEG在40-s epoch的可靠性大于0.9,并且在许多天或几周内保持稳定的高重测信度。qEEG的预测有效性是通过与临床测量和神经心理测试结果和表现的准确预测的显著和可复制的相关性来建立的。相比之下,非癫痫病例的非qeeg或眼球视觉检查的脑电图痕迹基本上为零预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and Reliability of Quantitative Electroencephalography
ABSTRACT Reliability and validity are statistical concepts that are reviewed and then applied to the field of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). The review of the scientific literature demonstrated high levels of split-half and test–retest reliability of qEEG and convincing content and predictive validity as well as other forms of validity. QEEG is distinguished fromnonquantitative EEG (“eyeball” examination of EEG traces), with the latter showing low reliability (e.g., 0.2–0.29) and poor interrater agreement for nonepilepsy evaluation. In contrast, qEEG is greater than 0.9 reliable with as little as 40-s epochs and remains stable with high test–retest reliability over many days and weeks. Predictive validity of qEEG is established by significant and replicable correlations with clinical measures and accurate predictions of outcome and performance on neuropsychological tests. In contrast, non-qEEG or eyeball visual examination of the EEG traces in cases of nonepilepsy has essentially zero predict...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields Book review: The Art of Artifacting Summaries and Abstracts of Scientific Papers Presented at the 2002 Society for Neuronal Regulation 10th Annual Conference, Scottsdale, Arizona Poster Presentation Abstracts Published online Book Review: Handbook of Mind-Body Medicine for Primary Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1