艺术家访谈及其在保护中的应用:对问题和实践的反思

Q2 Arts and Humanities AICCM Bulletin Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/10344233.2016.1251669
S. Cotté, N. Tse, A. Inglis
{"title":"艺术家访谈及其在保护中的应用:对问题和实践的反思","authors":"S. Cotté, N. Tse, A. Inglis","doi":"10.1080/10344233.2016.1251669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artists’ interviews are widely used in the conservation of contemporary art. Best practice is detailed in recent publications, conferences and workshops, however, there is little information on how to analyse the data collected, and the issues related to the dissemination and future access to the content. This article examines various techniques of analysis appropriated from qualitative research in the social sciences, and relates them to the intended uses of interviews in conservation. Drawing on a case study that involved interaction with an artist over several years, including interviews and informal conversations, this article argues that a conservators’ specific skills set has the capacity to interpret the findings and to understand the creative processes. It also highlights the importance of reflexivity and the public circulation of this interpretation, which is essential for the development of a sustainable practice of artists’ interviews in conservation.","PeriodicalId":7847,"journal":{"name":"AICCM Bulletin","volume":"37 1","pages":"107 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10344233.2016.1251669","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artists’ interviews and their use in conservation: reflections on issues and practices\",\"authors\":\"S. Cotté, N. Tse, A. Inglis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10344233.2016.1251669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artists’ interviews are widely used in the conservation of contemporary art. Best practice is detailed in recent publications, conferences and workshops, however, there is little information on how to analyse the data collected, and the issues related to the dissemination and future access to the content. This article examines various techniques of analysis appropriated from qualitative research in the social sciences, and relates them to the intended uses of interviews in conservation. Drawing on a case study that involved interaction with an artist over several years, including interviews and informal conversations, this article argues that a conservators’ specific skills set has the capacity to interpret the findings and to understand the creative processes. It also highlights the importance of reflexivity and the public circulation of this interpretation, which is essential for the development of a sustainable practice of artists’ interviews in conservation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AICCM Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10344233.2016.1251669\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AICCM Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10344233.2016.1251669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AICCM Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10344233.2016.1251669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

艺术家访谈在当代艺术保护中被广泛使用。最近的出版物、会议和讲习班详细介绍了最佳做法,但是,关于如何分析收集的数据以及与传播和今后获取内容有关的问题的信息很少。本文考察了从社会科学的定性研究中挪用的各种分析技术,并将它们与保护访谈的预期用途联系起来。这篇文章通过与一位艺术家多年的互动,包括采访和非正式交谈,得出了一个案例研究,认为文物保护人员的特定技能集有能力解释发现并理解创作过程。它还强调了这种解释的反身性和公共流通的重要性,这对于艺术家在保护中采访的可持续实践的发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artists’ interviews and their use in conservation: reflections on issues and practices
Artists’ interviews are widely used in the conservation of contemporary art. Best practice is detailed in recent publications, conferences and workshops, however, there is little information on how to analyse the data collected, and the issues related to the dissemination and future access to the content. This article examines various techniques of analysis appropriated from qualitative research in the social sciences, and relates them to the intended uses of interviews in conservation. Drawing on a case study that involved interaction with an artist over several years, including interviews and informal conversations, this article argues that a conservators’ specific skills set has the capacity to interpret the findings and to understand the creative processes. It also highlights the importance of reflexivity and the public circulation of this interpretation, which is essential for the development of a sustainable practice of artists’ interviews in conservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AICCM Bulletin
AICCM Bulletin Arts and Humanities-Museology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond Repair – Deaccession and the Management of Plastics New Dimensions in Conservation Imaging: Combining Photogrammetry and Photometric Stereo for 3D Documentation of Heritage Artefacts The Preservation of Tracing Paper: A case Study of TRA Archives Looking through X-Rays: The study of underlying painting in the oeuvre of Chen Cheng-po Conservation and analysis of textiles recovered from exhumed human remains after more than a century of burial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1