大国干预中东:中东剧变与政治走向

Yueqin Liu
{"title":"大国干预中东:中东剧变与政治走向","authors":"Yueqin Liu","doi":"10.1080/19370679.2013.12023221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: During the political upheaval in the Middle East in 2011, the Western countries adopted a policy focusing on both military intervention and the so-called “humanitarian interference” in the Middle East countries. Europe, the US and other Western powers distorted the “legitimacy” authorized by the UN and took military means to impose regime change in Libya, seriously disrupting the order of international relations. Their intervention efforts in this have far exceeded the ones before the Cold War. In the Intervention, they tried to secure legalization of their intervention, to take collective intervention, as well as nurture and support the country’s opposition parties to cause the “civil war” approach as the model of intervention. Their intervention has been blatant, fraudulent, hidden, and mandatory. From the development trend, because of the importance of the geopolitical position and strategic energy position of the Middle East and North Africa, as well as Western powers’ pursuit of global geopolitical interests, the Western powers’ intervention in the Middle East and North Africa will continue. These countries will still be faced with the historical responsibility to oppose power intervention. Their self-development and ability to maintain their own security will continue to face serious challenges.","PeriodicalId":63464,"journal":{"name":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2013.12023221","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Great Power Intervention in the Middle East Upheaval and Political Trend in the Middle East\",\"authors\":\"Yueqin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19370679.2013.12023221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: During the political upheaval in the Middle East in 2011, the Western countries adopted a policy focusing on both military intervention and the so-called “humanitarian interference” in the Middle East countries. Europe, the US and other Western powers distorted the “legitimacy” authorized by the UN and took military means to impose regime change in Libya, seriously disrupting the order of international relations. Their intervention efforts in this have far exceeded the ones before the Cold War. In the Intervention, they tried to secure legalization of their intervention, to take collective intervention, as well as nurture and support the country’s opposition parties to cause the “civil war” approach as the model of intervention. Their intervention has been blatant, fraudulent, hidden, and mandatory. From the development trend, because of the importance of the geopolitical position and strategic energy position of the Middle East and North Africa, as well as Western powers’ pursuit of global geopolitical interests, the Western powers’ intervention in the Middle East and North Africa will continue. These countries will still be faced with the historical responsibility to oppose power intervention. Their self-development and ability to maintain their own security will continue to face serious challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":63464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2013.12023221\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2013.12023221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2013.12023221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:2011年中东政局动荡期间,西方国家对中东国家采取了军事干预和所谓“人道主义干涉”并重的政策。欧美等西方大国歪曲联合国授权的“合法性”,采取军事手段强行推翻利比亚政权,严重扰乱国际关系秩序。他们在这方面的干预力度远远超过了冷战前。在干预中,他们试图确保其干预的合法化,采取集体干预,以及培育和支持该国反对党以“内战”方式作为干预的模式。他们的干预是明目张胆的、欺诈性的、隐蔽的和强制性的。从发展趋势看,由于中东北非地缘政治地位和战略能源地位的重要性,以及西方列强对全球地缘政治利益的追求,西方列强对中东北非的干预还将继续。这些国家仍将面临反对权力干预的历史责任。他们的自我发展和维护自身安全的能力将继续面临严峻挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Great Power Intervention in the Middle East Upheaval and Political Trend in the Middle East
Abstract: During the political upheaval in the Middle East in 2011, the Western countries adopted a policy focusing on both military intervention and the so-called “humanitarian interference” in the Middle East countries. Europe, the US and other Western powers distorted the “legitimacy” authorized by the UN and took military means to impose regime change in Libya, seriously disrupting the order of international relations. Their intervention efforts in this have far exceeded the ones before the Cold War. In the Intervention, they tried to secure legalization of their intervention, to take collective intervention, as well as nurture and support the country’s opposition parties to cause the “civil war” approach as the model of intervention. Their intervention has been blatant, fraudulent, hidden, and mandatory. From the development trend, because of the importance of the geopolitical position and strategic energy position of the Middle East and North Africa, as well as Western powers’ pursuit of global geopolitical interests, the Western powers’ intervention in the Middle East and North Africa will continue. These countries will still be faced with the historical responsibility to oppose power intervention. Their self-development and ability to maintain their own security will continue to face serious challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Effectiveness of the Carrot and Stick Counter-terrorist Measure: A Comparison of Algeria and Yemen “Islamic State” and the Transformation of Islamic Discourse in the Middle East A Preliminary Study on the “Islamic State” Thought in Modern Islamism Hajj and Its Impact on International Relations Root of Religious Extremist Thought and Sino-Arab Cooperation on Deradicalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1