罗伊诉韦德案:胎儿生命的修辞。

Central states speech journal Pub Date : 1976-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10510977609367892

Michael R. Hagan

{"title":"罗伊诉韦德案:胎儿生命的修辞。","authors":"Michael R. Hagan","doi":"10.1080/10510977609367892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Court decisions themselves, and not just arguments before courts, are rhetorical works. The Supreme Court majority opinion in the publicized 1973 abortion case Roe v. Wade demonstrated this rhetorical nature of decisions both in its choice of arguments and evidence and in its effort to organize symbolically the world of the medical and legal considerations surrounding abortion.","PeriodicalId":80904,"journal":{"name":"Central states speech journal","volume":"27 3 1","pages":"192-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10510977609367892","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"roe v. Wade: the rhetoric of fetal life.\",\"authors\":\"Michael R. Hagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10510977609367892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Court decisions themselves, and not just arguments before courts, are rhetorical works. The Supreme Court majority opinion in the publicized 1973 abortion case Roe v. Wade demonstrated this rhetorical nature of decisions both in its choice of arguments and evidence and in its effort to organize symbolically the world of the medical and legal considerations surrounding abortion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central states speech journal\",\"volume\":\"27 3 1\",\"pages\":\"192-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10510977609367892\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central states speech journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977609367892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central states speech journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977609367892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

摘要

法庭裁决本身，而不仅仅是法庭上的辩论，都是修辞作品。在1973年公开的罗伊诉韦德堕胎案中，最高法院的多数意见在其论据和证据的选择以及其象征性地组织围绕堕胎的医学和法律考虑的努力中，都表明了裁决的修辞性质。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

roe v. Wade: the rhetoric of fetal life.

Court decisions themselves, and not just arguments before courts, are rhetorical works. The Supreme Court majority opinion in the publicized 1973 abortion case Roe v. Wade demonstrated this rhetorical nature of decisions both in its choice of arguments and evidence and in its effort to organize symbolically the world of the medical and legal considerations surrounding abortion.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助