光有善意是不够的

J. Lindenmeyer
{"title":"光有善意是不够的","authors":"J. Lindenmeyer","doi":"10.1080/1556035X.2015.1099922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the helping professionals in the field of substance abuse problems do their work with a lot of engagement and good will. But their work is very often mainly based on a mixture of selectively remembered personal experience and personal convictions while lacking profound scientific knowledge of what really works best for their clients. On the other hand, many clinicians complain that addiction research is not really helpful because their daily work with patients is much more complex than typical research designs. For this reason, it is with great pleasure that I start my new role as guest editor of the Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery by presenting two articles that, besides their diverse subjects, share their emphasis on the need for a better scientific understanding of prevention and treatment efforts in the field:","PeriodicalId":88011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","volume":"10 1","pages":"289 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2015.1099922","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Good Will Is Not Enough\",\"authors\":\"J. Lindenmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1556035X.2015.1099922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most of the helping professionals in the field of substance abuse problems do their work with a lot of engagement and good will. But their work is very often mainly based on a mixture of selectively remembered personal experience and personal convictions while lacking profound scientific knowledge of what really works best for their clients. On the other hand, many clinicians complain that addiction research is not really helpful because their daily work with patients is much more complex than typical research designs. For this reason, it is with great pleasure that I start my new role as guest editor of the Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery by presenting two articles that, besides their diverse subjects, share their emphasis on the need for a better scientific understanding of prevention and treatment efforts in the field:\",\"PeriodicalId\":88011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"289 - 289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2015.1099922\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2015.1099922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2015.1099922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在药物滥用问题领域,大多数帮助专业人员都是带着大量的投入和善意来工作的。但他们的工作往往主要是基于选择性记忆的个人经验和个人信念的混合,而缺乏真正对客户最有效的深刻的科学知识。另一方面,许多临床医生抱怨说,成瘾研究并没有真正的帮助,因为他们与病人的日常工作比典型的研究设计要复杂得多。出于这个原因,我非常高兴地开始了我作为《成瘾与康复团体杂志》客座编辑的新角色,我将发表两篇文章,除了它们不同的主题外,它们都强调需要对该领域的预防和治疗工作有更好的科学理解:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Good Will Is Not Enough
Most of the helping professionals in the field of substance abuse problems do their work with a lot of engagement and good will. But their work is very often mainly based on a mixture of selectively remembered personal experience and personal convictions while lacking profound scientific knowledge of what really works best for their clients. On the other hand, many clinicians complain that addiction research is not really helpful because their daily work with patients is much more complex than typical research designs. For this reason, it is with great pleasure that I start my new role as guest editor of the Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery by presenting two articles that, besides their diverse subjects, share their emphasis on the need for a better scientific understanding of prevention and treatment efforts in the field:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility Study and Design of the ICU Infection Registry System for Patients Admitted to the Alzahra University Hospital in Isfahan: A Methodology Study. Is L-Glutamate Toxic to Neurons and Thereby Contributes to Neuronal Loss and Neurodegeneration? A Systematic Review. A Revised Multifamily Group Curriculum: The Need for Family Member Recovery from Addiction Rolling Psychodynamic Group for Cocaine Use Disorder: A Single-Group Study Using Multilevel Models The Window Opens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1