揭示CAD工具在工业设计中的特殊性与设计理论风格的模型一般奇点

IF 1.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI:10.1080/21650349.2016.1190301
Pierre-Antoine Arrighi, P. Le Masson, B. Weil, A. Kazakçi
{"title":"揭示CAD工具在工业设计中的特殊性与设计理论风格的模型一般奇点","authors":"Pierre-Antoine Arrighi, P. Le Masson, B. Weil, A. Kazakçi","doi":"10.1080/21650349.2016.1190301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract According to some casual observers, computer-aided design (CAD) tools are very similar. These tools are used to design new artifacts in a digital environment; hence, they share typical software components, such as a computing engine and human–machine interface. However, CAD software is dedicated to specific professionals – such as engineers, three-dimensional (3D) artists, and industrial designers (IDs) – who claim that, despite their apparent similarities, CAD tools are so different that they are not substitutable. Moreover, CAD tools do not fully meet the needs of IDs. This paper aims at better characterizing CAD tools by taking into account their underlying design logic, which involves relying on recent advances in design theory. We show that engineering CAD tools are actually modeling tools that design a generic variety of products; 3D artist CAD tools not only design but immediately produce single digital artifacts; and ID CAD tools are neither a mix nor an hybridization of engineering CAD and 3D artist CAD tools but have their own logic, namely to create new conceptual models for a large variety of products, that is, the creation of a unique original style that leads to a generic singularity. Such tools are useful for many creative designers beyond IDs.","PeriodicalId":43485,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation","volume":"6 1","pages":"21 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21650349.2016.1190301","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering the specificities of CAD tools for industrial design with design theory – style models for generic singularity\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Antoine Arrighi, P. Le Masson, B. Weil, A. Kazakçi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21650349.2016.1190301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract According to some casual observers, computer-aided design (CAD) tools are very similar. These tools are used to design new artifacts in a digital environment; hence, they share typical software components, such as a computing engine and human–machine interface. However, CAD software is dedicated to specific professionals – such as engineers, three-dimensional (3D) artists, and industrial designers (IDs) – who claim that, despite their apparent similarities, CAD tools are so different that they are not substitutable. Moreover, CAD tools do not fully meet the needs of IDs. This paper aims at better characterizing CAD tools by taking into account their underlying design logic, which involves relying on recent advances in design theory. We show that engineering CAD tools are actually modeling tools that design a generic variety of products; 3D artist CAD tools not only design but immediately produce single digital artifacts; and ID CAD tools are neither a mix nor an hybridization of engineering CAD and 3D artist CAD tools but have their own logic, namely to create new conceptual models for a large variety of products, that is, the creation of a unique original style that leads to a generic singularity. Such tools are useful for many creative designers beyond IDs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21650349.2016.1190301\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2016.1190301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2016.1190301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据一些偶然的观察者,计算机辅助设计(CAD)工具是非常相似的。这些工具用于在数字环境中设计新的工件;因此,它们共享典型的软件组件,例如计算引擎和人机界面。然而,CAD软件专用于特定的专业人员,如工程师、三维(3D)艺术家和工业设计师(id),他们声称,尽管它们明显相似,但CAD工具是如此不同,以至于它们是不可替代的。此外,CAD工具不能完全满足id的需求。本文旨在通过考虑其潜在的设计逻辑来更好地表征CAD工具,这涉及到依赖于设计理论的最新进展。我们表明,工程CAD工具实际上是设计各种通用产品的建模工具;3D艺术家CAD工具不仅可以设计,而且可以立即产生单个数字工件;而ID CAD工具既不是工程CAD和3D艺术家CAD工具的混合也不是杂交,而是有自己的逻辑,即为大量品种的产品创建新的概念模型,即创造独特的原创风格,从而导致通用的奇点。除了id,这些工具对许多有创意的设计师也很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncovering the specificities of CAD tools for industrial design with design theory – style models for generic singularity
Abstract According to some casual observers, computer-aided design (CAD) tools are very similar. These tools are used to design new artifacts in a digital environment; hence, they share typical software components, such as a computing engine and human–machine interface. However, CAD software is dedicated to specific professionals – such as engineers, three-dimensional (3D) artists, and industrial designers (IDs) – who claim that, despite their apparent similarities, CAD tools are so different that they are not substitutable. Moreover, CAD tools do not fully meet the needs of IDs. This paper aims at better characterizing CAD tools by taking into account their underlying design logic, which involves relying on recent advances in design theory. We show that engineering CAD tools are actually modeling tools that design a generic variety of products; 3D artist CAD tools not only design but immediately produce single digital artifacts; and ID CAD tools are neither a mix nor an hybridization of engineering CAD and 3D artist CAD tools but have their own logic, namely to create new conceptual models for a large variety of products, that is, the creation of a unique original style that leads to a generic singularity. Such tools are useful for many creative designers beyond IDs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
27.80%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation is an international publication that provides a forum for discussing the nature and potential of creativity and innovation in design from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Design creativity and innovation is truly an interdisciplinary academic research field that will interest and stimulate researchers of engineering design, industrial design, architecture, art, and similar areas. The journal aims to not only promote existing research disciplines but also pioneer a new one that lies in the intermediate area between the domains of systems engineering, information technology, computer science, social science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, psychology, philosophy, linguistics, and related fields. The journal covers, but is not restricted to, the following topics: ·Theories on Design Creativity and Innovation ·Cognition of Design Creativity ·Innovative Process ·Inventive Process ·Analogical Reasoning for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Design Synthesis ·Method and Tools for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Representation of Design Creativity and Innovation ·Education for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Concept Generation and Inspiration.
期刊最新文献
Leading to overcome heterogeneous fixations: designing to limit the impact of the rejection of creative ideas From science to art forms: exploring design, creativity and innovation through chaos physicalization Appreciation to Reviewers Extracting design knowledge from online product reviews to support design creativity The dialect of user-centered care: creating an understanding of how current design methods are used within health through an allied-health lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1