{"title":"通信:远程医疗:评估的新框架","authors":"B. Yawn","doi":"10.1089/107830200311851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent strategies for evaluating telemedicine attempt to incorporate broad issues such as medical effectiveness, optimal strategies for blending face to face and telemedicine, the direct and indirect costs of telemedicine services, accessibility, and patient and provider satisfaction. To address these issues, a scheme of evaluating telemedicine for a series of medical conditions or diagnoses has been recommended. The primary problem with this evaluation scheme is the need to assess telemedicine for each condition in which its use is proposed. This paper suggests an alternative framework for evaluation based on the clinical tasks that a physician or other health care provider must do to assess, treat, and follow patients. These tasks, which are employed in the care of most conditions, include visual tasks, auditory tasks, and instrumentation and palpation tasks. For each clinical task, the technology requirements for tools and settings would first be established. The scope and limitation of the tools for t...","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"6 1","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830200311851","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication: Telemedicine: A New Framework for Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"B. Yawn\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/107830200311851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent strategies for evaluating telemedicine attempt to incorporate broad issues such as medical effectiveness, optimal strategies for blending face to face and telemedicine, the direct and indirect costs of telemedicine services, accessibility, and patient and provider satisfaction. To address these issues, a scheme of evaluating telemedicine for a series of medical conditions or diagnoses has been recommended. The primary problem with this evaluation scheme is the need to assess telemedicine for each condition in which its use is proposed. This paper suggests an alternative framework for evaluation based on the clinical tasks that a physician or other health care provider must do to assess, treat, and follow patients. These tasks, which are employed in the care of most conditions, include visual tasks, auditory tasks, and instrumentation and palpation tasks. For each clinical task, the technology requirements for tools and settings would first be established. The scope and limitation of the tools for t...\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"55-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830200311851\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830200311851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830200311851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

最近评估远程医疗的战略试图纳入广泛的问题,如医疗有效性、面对面和远程医疗混合的最佳战略、远程医疗服务的直接和间接成本、可及性以及患者和提供者满意度。为了解决这些问题,建议对一系列医疗状况或诊断的远程医疗进行评估。该评估方案的主要问题是需要对提出使用远程医疗的每种情况进行评估。本文提出了一种基于临床任务的评估框架,医生或其他卫生保健提供者必须对患者进行评估、治疗和随访。这些任务在大多数情况下都有应用,包括视觉任务、听觉任务、仪器和触诊任务。对于每个临床任务,首先要确定工具和设置的技术要求。工具的范围和限制…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Communication: Telemedicine: A New Framework for Evaluation
Recent strategies for evaluating telemedicine attempt to incorporate broad issues such as medical effectiveness, optimal strategies for blending face to face and telemedicine, the direct and indirect costs of telemedicine services, accessibility, and patient and provider satisfaction. To address these issues, a scheme of evaluating telemedicine for a series of medical conditions or diagnoses has been recommended. The primary problem with this evaluation scheme is the need to assess telemedicine for each condition in which its use is proposed. This paper suggests an alternative framework for evaluation based on the clinical tasks that a physician or other health care provider must do to assess, treat, and follow patients. These tasks, which are employed in the care of most conditions, include visual tasks, auditory tasks, and instrumentation and palpation tasks. For each clinical task, the technology requirements for tools and settings would first be established. The scope and limitation of the tools for t...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additional Abstract from the American Telemedicine Association's Fifth Annual Meeting May 21-24, 2000, Phoenix, Arizona. Behavioral Telemedicine: A New Approach to the Continuous Nonintrusive Monitoring of Activities of Daily Living Specialist–Primary Care Provider–Patient Communication in Telemedical Consultations Editorial: Telemedicine Nomenclature: What Does It Mean? Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1