使用最新的单采系统采集大剂量血小板的供体安全问题

R. Chaudhary, S. Das, D. Khetan, S. Ojha, S. Verma
{"title":"使用最新的单采系统采集大剂量血小板的供体安全问题","authors":"R. Chaudhary, S. Das, D. Khetan, S. Ojha, S. Verma","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2009.01116.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \nThe practice of high-yield or double-dose platelet (DDP) collection through automated apheresis is gradually increasing. Very few studies have examined donor safety issues in DDP collection. The present study highlights the process of DDP donor selection as well as the product quality and donor safety issues on 67 donors. All procedures were performed following the departmental standard operating procedure. We observed a significantly higher mean platelet yield with the Amicus separator than the Fresenius separator (5.4 × 1011vs. 5.1 × 1011, P = 0.03). The Fresenius separator processed a mean blood volume of 3974 mL and collected a mean platelet amount of 444.9 mL, and these were significantly higher when compared with Amicus (P < 0.0001). Mean values of procedure-related parameters, such as acid-citrate-phosphate volume, donation time, needle time, processing time and whole blood processed, and donor-related parameters, like citrate toxicity and vasovagal reactions, were significantly higher during DDP than single-dose platelet collection (P < 0.05). We conclude that obtaining eligible donors for DDP from a shrinking donor population with low normal platelet values is a difficult task. Therefore, each transfusion service should set their own guidelines for DDP collection with the objectives of donor safety and optimal product quality.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2009.01116.X","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor safety issues in high-dose platelet collection using the latest apheresis systems\",\"authors\":\"R. Chaudhary, S. Das, D. Khetan, S. Ojha, S. Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2009.01116.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY \\nThe practice of high-yield or double-dose platelet (DDP) collection through automated apheresis is gradually increasing. Very few studies have examined donor safety issues in DDP collection. The present study highlights the process of DDP donor selection as well as the product quality and donor safety issues on 67 donors. All procedures were performed following the departmental standard operating procedure. We observed a significantly higher mean platelet yield with the Amicus separator than the Fresenius separator (5.4 × 1011vs. 5.1 × 1011, P = 0.03). The Fresenius separator processed a mean blood volume of 3974 mL and collected a mean platelet amount of 444.9 mL, and these were significantly higher when compared with Amicus (P < 0.0001). Mean values of procedure-related parameters, such as acid-citrate-phosphate volume, donation time, needle time, processing time and whole blood processed, and donor-related parameters, like citrate toxicity and vasovagal reactions, were significantly higher during DDP than single-dose platelet collection (P < 0.05). We conclude that obtaining eligible donors for DDP from a shrinking donor population with low normal platelet values is a difficult task. Therefore, each transfusion service should set their own guidelines for DDP collection with the objectives of donor safety and optimal product quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2009.01116.X\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2009.01116.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2009.01116.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

通过自动分离采集高产量或双剂量血小板(DDP)的做法正在逐渐增加。很少有研究检查DDP收集中的供体安全问题。本研究重点介绍了67个供体的DDP供体选择过程以及产品质量和供体安全问题。所有程序均按照部门标准操作程序执行。我们发现Amicus分离机的平均血小板产量显著高于费森尤斯分离机(5.4 × 1011vs)。5.1 × 1011, p = 0.03)。费森尤斯分离机平均处理血容量为3974 mL,平均收集血小板数量为444.9 mL,显著高于Amicus分离机(P < 0.0001)。DDP过程中,酸-柠檬酸盐-磷酸盐体积、捐献时间、针头时间、处理时间、全血处理等程序相关参数的平均值,以及柠檬酸盐毒性、血管抽血反应等供者相关参数的平均值均显著高于单剂量血小板采集(P < 0.05)。我们的结论是,从血小板正常值低的供体人群中获得合格的DDP供体是一项艰巨的任务。因此,每个输血服务机构都应该制定自己的DDP收集指南,以献血者安全和最佳产品质量为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Donor safety issues in high-dose platelet collection using the latest apheresis systems
SUMMARY The practice of high-yield or double-dose platelet (DDP) collection through automated apheresis is gradually increasing. Very few studies have examined donor safety issues in DDP collection. The present study highlights the process of DDP donor selection as well as the product quality and donor safety issues on 67 donors. All procedures were performed following the departmental standard operating procedure. We observed a significantly higher mean platelet yield with the Amicus separator than the Fresenius separator (5.4 × 1011vs. 5.1 × 1011, P = 0.03). The Fresenius separator processed a mean blood volume of 3974 mL and collected a mean platelet amount of 444.9 mL, and these were significantly higher when compared with Amicus (P < 0.0001). Mean values of procedure-related parameters, such as acid-citrate-phosphate volume, donation time, needle time, processing time and whole blood processed, and donor-related parameters, like citrate toxicity and vasovagal reactions, were significantly higher during DDP than single-dose platelet collection (P < 0.05). We conclude that obtaining eligible donors for DDP from a shrinking donor population with low normal platelet values is a difficult task. Therefore, each transfusion service should set their own guidelines for DDP collection with the objectives of donor safety and optimal product quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Washing and filtering of cell-salvaged blood - does it make autotransfusion safer? Intravenous iron in digestive diseases: INTRAVENOUS IRON IN DIGESTIVE DISEASES Iron therapy in cancer-induced anemia: IRON THERAPY IN CANCER-INDUCED ANEMIA Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy and postpartum Role of iron replacement in the management of preoperative anemia: PREOPERATIVE IRON REPLACEMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1