护理的连续性及其在患者满意度中的作用的系统评价,并减少住院的成年患者接受家庭护理服务。

Gwendolyn D Costantini, M. McDermott, Denise Primiano, Michelle Santomassino, J. Slyer, J. Singleton
{"title":"护理的连续性及其在患者满意度中的作用的系统评价,并减少住院的成年患者接受家庭护理服务。","authors":"Gwendolyn D Costantini, M. McDermott, Denise Primiano, Michelle Santomassino, J. Slyer, J. Singleton","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review question/objective \nThe overall objective of this systematic review is to determine the best available evidence related to the effectiveness of continuity of care interventions on patient outcomes. \nThe specific review questions to be asked are: \n- What continuity of care interventions are most effective in improving patient satisfaction in adult patients receiving home care services? \n- What continuity of care interventions are most effective in reducing all-cause hospital readmission rates among adults receiving home care services? \nInclusion Criteria \nTypes of participants \nThe review will consider studies that include all adults, male and female (aged 18 years old and above) receiving home care services, regardless of diagnosis, stage or severity of disease, co-morbidities, and previous treatment received. \nTypes of interventions/phenomena of interest \nThis review will consider studies that evaluate all models/types of interventions for continuity of care of adult patients delivered by registered nurses in home care settings. \nComparator: no intervention \nTypes of outcome measures \nThis review will consider studies that include the following outcome measure, but not limited to: \n- All-cause hospital readmissions measured as patients who experience an unplanned admission to the same hospital, a different hospital, or another acute care facility for the same diagnosis or for a different diagnosis. \n- Patient satisfaction measured by patient self-report.C-96FD","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"9 64 Suppl 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-346","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Continuity of care and its role in patient satisfaction and decreased hospital admissions in the adult patient receiving home care services.\",\"authors\":\"Gwendolyn D Costantini, M. McDermott, Denise Primiano, Michelle Santomassino, J. Slyer, J. Singleton\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Review question/objective \\nThe overall objective of this systematic review is to determine the best available evidence related to the effectiveness of continuity of care interventions on patient outcomes. \\nThe specific review questions to be asked are: \\n- What continuity of care interventions are most effective in improving patient satisfaction in adult patients receiving home care services? \\n- What continuity of care interventions are most effective in reducing all-cause hospital readmission rates among adults receiving home care services? \\nInclusion Criteria \\nTypes of participants \\nThe review will consider studies that include all adults, male and female (aged 18 years old and above) receiving home care services, regardless of diagnosis, stage or severity of disease, co-morbidities, and previous treatment received. \\nTypes of interventions/phenomena of interest \\nThis review will consider studies that evaluate all models/types of interventions for continuity of care of adult patients delivered by registered nurses in home care settings. \\nComparator: no intervention \\nTypes of outcome measures \\nThis review will consider studies that include the following outcome measure, but not limited to: \\n- All-cause hospital readmissions measured as patients who experience an unplanned admission to the same hospital, a different hospital, or another acute care facility for the same diagnosis or for a different diagnosis. \\n- Patient satisfaction measured by patient self-report.C-96FD\",\"PeriodicalId\":91723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 64 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-346\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

回顾问题/目标本系统回顾的总体目标是确定与连续性护理干预对患者预后的有效性相关的最佳现有证据。要提出的具体审查问题是:-在接受家庭护理服务的成年患者中,什么样的连续性护理干预措施对提高患者满意度最有效?在降低接受家庭护理服务的成年人的全因再入院率方面,什么样的连续性护理干预措施最有效?纳入标准参与者类型本综述将纳入所有接受家庭护理服务的成年人,无论男性和女性(18岁及以上),无论疾病的诊断、分期或严重程度、合并症和先前接受的治疗。干预措施的类型/感兴趣的现象本综述将考虑评估所有模式/类型的干预措施的研究,这些干预措施是由注册护士在家庭护理环境中为成年患者提供护理的连续性。结果测量的类型本综述将考虑包括以下结果测量的研究,但不限于:-全因医院再入院,测量为因相同诊断或不同诊断而意外入住同一医院、不同医院或另一急性护理机构的患者。-通过患者自我报告测量患者满意度。c - 96fd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Review of Continuity of care and its role in patient satisfaction and decreased hospital admissions in the adult patient receiving home care services.
Review question/objective The overall objective of this systematic review is to determine the best available evidence related to the effectiveness of continuity of care interventions on patient outcomes. The specific review questions to be asked are: - What continuity of care interventions are most effective in improving patient satisfaction in adult patients receiving home care services? - What continuity of care interventions are most effective in reducing all-cause hospital readmission rates among adults receiving home care services? Inclusion Criteria Types of participants The review will consider studies that include all adults, male and female (aged 18 years old and above) receiving home care services, regardless of diagnosis, stage or severity of disease, co-morbidities, and previous treatment received. Types of interventions/phenomena of interest This review will consider studies that evaluate all models/types of interventions for continuity of care of adult patients delivered by registered nurses in home care settings. Comparator: no intervention Types of outcome measures This review will consider studies that include the following outcome measure, but not limited to: - All-cause hospital readmissions measured as patients who experience an unplanned admission to the same hospital, a different hospital, or another acute care facility for the same diagnosis or for a different diagnosis. - Patient satisfaction measured by patient self-report.C-96FD
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review on the role of extremity skin temperature as a non-invasive marker for hypoperfusion in critically ill adults in the intensive care setting. Effectiveness of interventions for the assessment and prevention of falls in adult psychiatric patients: A systematic review. The impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure: A systematic review. Effectiveness of surgical weight loss on the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1