{"title":"交联杜仲胶闭孔器的定量体积分析。","authors":"C. Zogheib, M. Hanna, D. Pasqualini, A. Naaman","doi":"10.11138/ads/2016.7.3.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of technique on the filling quality of 2 recently introduced obturation systems comparatively with warm vertical compaction using micro-computed tomography.\n\n\nMETHODS\n36 single-rooted teeth were selected, root canals prepared, and assigned to 3 groups (n=12), according to the filling technique: warm vertical compaction technique WVC, GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and Gutta Fusion (VDW, Germany). Each specimen was scanned using a micro-CT. Percentage of voids was calculated and data statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with a significance level of 5%.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAll obturations showed satisfactory similar results at the apical level. Differences between the three obturation methods were not significant at 1 mm (-p-value >0.05), 3 mm (-p-value >0.05) and 5 mm (-p-value >0.05). No root fillings were void-free. No significant difference was found between the WVC technique, the GuttaCore technique and the Gutta Fusion technique concerning percentage of apical voids regardless of canal level.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study shows the efficiency of cross-linked obturators in filling root canals hermetically by comparing them to the warm vertical compaction technique. Results show that these obturation techniques were equally sufficient concerning apical adaptation making them appropriate to use in endodontic obturations.","PeriodicalId":78041,"journal":{"name":"Annali di stomatologia","volume":"7 3 1","pages":"46-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative volumetric analysis of cross-linked gutta-percha obturators.\",\"authors\":\"C. Zogheib, M. Hanna, D. Pasqualini, A. Naaman\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/ads/2016.7.3.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\nThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of technique on the filling quality of 2 recently introduced obturation systems comparatively with warm vertical compaction using micro-computed tomography.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\n36 single-rooted teeth were selected, root canals prepared, and assigned to 3 groups (n=12), according to the filling technique: warm vertical compaction technique WVC, GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and Gutta Fusion (VDW, Germany). Each specimen was scanned using a micro-CT. Percentage of voids was calculated and data statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with a significance level of 5%.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAll obturations showed satisfactory similar results at the apical level. Differences between the three obturation methods were not significant at 1 mm (-p-value >0.05), 3 mm (-p-value >0.05) and 5 mm (-p-value >0.05). No root fillings were void-free. No significant difference was found between the WVC technique, the GuttaCore technique and the Gutta Fusion technique concerning percentage of apical voids regardless of canal level.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThis study shows the efficiency of cross-linked obturators in filling root canals hermetically by comparing them to the warm vertical compaction technique. Results show that these obturation techniques were equally sufficient concerning apical adaptation making them appropriate to use in endodontic obturations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali di stomatologia\",\"volume\":\"7 3 1\",\"pages\":\"46-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali di stomatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2016.7.3.046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2016.7.3.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
摘要
目的利用显微计算机断层成像技术,比较两种新近引进的充填系统与温式垂直压实技术对充填质量的影响。方法选择36颗单根牙,准备根管,根据充填技术分为3组(n=12):温垂直压实技术WVC、GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK)和Gutta Fusion (VDW, Germany)。每个标本用微型ct扫描。计算空洞率,采用Kruskal Wallis检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。结果所有缝合方法在根尖水平均获得满意的结果。1 mm (-p-value >0.05)、3 mm (-p-value >0.05)和5 mm (-p-value >0.05) 3种封闭方法间差异无统计学意义。没有一种牙根填充物是无空隙的。无论根管水平如何,WVC技术、GuttaCore技术和Gutta Fusion技术在根尖空隙率方面无显著差异。结论本研究通过对比温式垂直压实技术和交联式闭孔器在根管密封方面的有效性。结果表明,这些封闭技术在根尖适应性方面同样充分,适合用于根管封闭。
Quantitative volumetric analysis of cross-linked gutta-percha obturators.
AIM
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of technique on the filling quality of 2 recently introduced obturation systems comparatively with warm vertical compaction using micro-computed tomography.
METHODS
36 single-rooted teeth were selected, root canals prepared, and assigned to 3 groups (n=12), according to the filling technique: warm vertical compaction technique WVC, GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and Gutta Fusion (VDW, Germany). Each specimen was scanned using a micro-CT. Percentage of voids was calculated and data statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS
All obturations showed satisfactory similar results at the apical level. Differences between the three obturation methods were not significant at 1 mm (-p-value >0.05), 3 mm (-p-value >0.05) and 5 mm (-p-value >0.05). No root fillings were void-free. No significant difference was found between the WVC technique, the GuttaCore technique and the Gutta Fusion technique concerning percentage of apical voids regardless of canal level.
CONCLUSION
This study shows the efficiency of cross-linked obturators in filling root canals hermetically by comparing them to the warm vertical compaction technique. Results show that these obturation techniques were equally sufficient concerning apical adaptation making them appropriate to use in endodontic obturations.