外周动脉疾病患者与年龄、性别匹配对照组内皮功能指标的比较

IF 2.5 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-31 DOI:10.1155/2016/2969740
Richard B. Allan, Simon V. Vun, J. Ian Spark
{"title":"外周动脉疾病患者与年龄、性别匹配对照组内皮功能指标的比较","authors":"Richard B. Allan, Simon V. Vun, J. Ian Spark","doi":"10.1155/2016/2969740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), peripheral artery tonometry (PAT), and serum nitric oxide (NO) measures of endothelial function in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) against age/gender matched controls. 25 patients (mean age: 72.4 years, M : F 18 : 7) with established PAD and an age/gender matched group of 25 healthy controls (mean age: 72.4 years, M : F 18 : 7) were studied. Endothelial function was measured using the % FMD, reactive hyperemia index (RHI) using PAT and serum NO (μmol). Difference for each method between PAD and control patients and correlation between the methods were investigated. FMD and RHI were lower in patients with PAD (median FMD for PAD = 2.16% versus control = 3.77%, p = 0.034 and median RHI in PAD = 1.64 versus control = 1.92, p = 0.005). NO levels were not significantly different between the groups (PAD median = 7.70 μmol, control median = 13.05 μmol, p = 0.662). These results were obtained in elderly patients and cannot be extrapolated to younger individuals. FMD and PAT both demonstrated a lower hyperaemic response in patients with PAD; however, FMD results in PAD patients were unequivocally reduced whereas half the PAD patients had RHI values above the established threshold for endothelial dysfunction. This suggests that FMD is a more appropriate method for the measurement of NO-mediated endothelial function.","PeriodicalId":14448,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/2969740","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Measures of Endothelial Function in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Age and Gender Matched Controls\",\"authors\":\"Richard B. Allan, Simon V. Vun, J. Ian Spark\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/2969740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), peripheral artery tonometry (PAT), and serum nitric oxide (NO) measures of endothelial function in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) against age/gender matched controls. 25 patients (mean age: 72.4 years, M : F 18 : 7) with established PAD and an age/gender matched group of 25 healthy controls (mean age: 72.4 years, M : F 18 : 7) were studied. Endothelial function was measured using the % FMD, reactive hyperemia index (RHI) using PAT and serum NO (μmol). Difference for each method between PAD and control patients and correlation between the methods were investigated. FMD and RHI were lower in patients with PAD (median FMD for PAD = 2.16% versus control = 3.77%, p = 0.034 and median RHI in PAD = 1.64 versus control = 1.92, p = 0.005). NO levels were not significantly different between the groups (PAD median = 7.70 μmol, control median = 13.05 μmol, p = 0.662). These results were obtained in elderly patients and cannot be extrapolated to younger individuals. FMD and PAT both demonstrated a lower hyperaemic response in patients with PAD; however, FMD results in PAD patients were unequivocally reduced whereas half the PAD patients had RHI values above the established threshold for endothelial dysfunction. This suggests that FMD is a more appropriate method for the measurement of NO-mediated endothelial function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/2969740\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2969740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2969740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本研究比较了外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的血流介导扩张(FMD)、外周动脉血压计(PAT)和血清一氧化氮(NO)测量内皮功能与年龄/性别匹配的对照组。研究对象为25例确诊的PAD患者(平均年龄:72.4岁,男:女18.7)和25例年龄/性别匹配的健康对照组(平均年龄:72.4岁,男:女18.7)。内皮功能用FMD %测定,反应性充血指数(RHI)用PAT测定,血清NO (μmol)测定。研究PAD患者与对照组各方法的差异及方法间的相关性。PAD患者的FMD和RHI较低(PAD患者的中位FMD = 2.16%,对照组= 3.77%,p = 0.034; PAD患者的中位RHI = 1.64,对照组= 1.92,p = 0.005)。各组间NO水平差异无统计学意义(PAD中位数= 7.70 μmol,对照组中位数= 13.05 μmol, p = 0.662)。这些结果是在老年患者中获得的,不能外推到年轻人身上。FMD和PAT均显示PAD患者的充血反应较低;然而,PAD患者的FMD结果明显降低,而一半PAD患者的RHI值高于内皮功能障碍的既定阈值。这表明FMD是测量no介导的内皮功能更合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Measures of Endothelial Function in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Age and Gender Matched Controls
This study compared flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), peripheral artery tonometry (PAT), and serum nitric oxide (NO) measures of endothelial function in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) against age/gender matched controls. 25 patients (mean age: 72.4 years, M : F 18 : 7) with established PAD and an age/gender matched group of 25 healthy controls (mean age: 72.4 years, M : F 18 : 7) were studied. Endothelial function was measured using the % FMD, reactive hyperemia index (RHI) using PAT and serum NO (μmol). Difference for each method between PAD and control patients and correlation between the methods were investigated. FMD and RHI were lower in patients with PAD (median FMD for PAD = 2.16% versus control = 3.77%, p = 0.034 and median RHI in PAD = 1.64 versus control = 1.92, p = 0.005). NO levels were not significantly different between the groups (PAD median = 7.70 μmol, control median = 13.05 μmol, p = 0.662). These results were obtained in elderly patients and cannot be extrapolated to younger individuals. FMD and PAT both demonstrated a lower hyperaemic response in patients with PAD; however, FMD results in PAD patients were unequivocally reduced whereas half the PAD patients had RHI values above the established threshold for endothelial dysfunction. This suggests that FMD is a more appropriate method for the measurement of NO-mediated endothelial function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
International Journal of Vascular Medicine PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Analyzing Cardiovascular Disease Research in the Arab Region: A Bibliometric Review From 2012 to 2022. Long-Term Clinical and Imaging Findings in Patients with Lower Extremity Varicose Veins Treated with Endovenous Laser Treatment: A Follow-Up Study of up to 12 Years. Angiopoietin-2 Is Associated with Aortic Stiffness in Diabetes Patients in Ghana: A Case-Control Study. Aerobic Exercise versus Electronic Cigarette in Vascular Aging Process: First Histological Insight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1