使耶路撒冷合法化,或法律、幻想和信仰合法化

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 2011-12-23 DOI:10.1163/9789004210257_010
Nathaniel Berman
{"title":"使耶路撒冷合法化,或法律、幻想和信仰合法化","authors":"Nathaniel Berman","doi":"10.1163/9789004210257_010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the author sought to apply his general approach to one aspect of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, often considered one of the most 'baffling' in the world. His analysis criticizes the idea that internationalism provides a neutral and rational perspective, and that it, in that sense, radically differs from nationalism. Just as there are various forms or conceptions of the universality of international authority, so are there competing conceptions of its rationality. He focuses on three attitudes, three different forms of reason, that characterize international lawyers and policymakers dealing with nationalism. The author prefers to speak of a \"dedoublement passionnel\" of their internationalist and nationalist longings. He says that, the fantasy of such a policy proposer \"dedouble\" is that there is a way we can be both believers in cosmopolitan peace and yet remain who we are: passionate, partisan nationalists. Keywords:dedoublement passionnel; Israeli-Palestinian; partisan nationalists","PeriodicalId":44667,"journal":{"name":"Catholic University Law Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"823-836"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legalizing Jerusalem or, of Law, Fantasy, and Faith\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel Berman\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004210257_010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the author sought to apply his general approach to one aspect of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, often considered one of the most 'baffling' in the world. His analysis criticizes the idea that internationalism provides a neutral and rational perspective, and that it, in that sense, radically differs from nationalism. Just as there are various forms or conceptions of the universality of international authority, so are there competing conceptions of its rationality. He focuses on three attitudes, three different forms of reason, that characterize international lawyers and policymakers dealing with nationalism. The author prefers to speak of a \\\"dedoublement passionnel\\\" of their internationalist and nationalist longings. He says that, the fantasy of such a policy proposer \\\"dedouble\\\" is that there is a way we can be both believers in cosmopolitan peace and yet remain who we are: passionate, partisan nationalists. Keywords:dedoublement passionnel; Israeli-Palestinian; partisan nationalists\",\"PeriodicalId\":44667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catholic University Law Review\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"823-836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catholic University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004210257_010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catholic University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004210257_010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在这项研究中,作者试图将他的一般方法应用于巴以冲突的一个方面,巴以冲突通常被认为是世界上最“令人困惑”的冲突之一。他的分析批评了国际主义提供了一种中立和理性的观点,在这种意义上,它与民族主义截然不同。正如国际权威的普遍性有各种形式或概念一样,对其合理性也有各种相互竞争的概念。他专注于三种态度,三种不同形式的理性,这是国际律师和政策制定者处理民族主义的特点。作者更倾向于用他们对国际主义和民族主义的渴望“去双重激情”来形容。他说,这样一个“双重”政策制定者的幻想是,有一种方法可以让我们既相信世界和平,又保持我们自己:热情的、党派的民族主义者。关键词:dedoublement passionnel;巴;党派的民族主义者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legalizing Jerusalem or, of Law, Fantasy, and Faith
In this study, the author sought to apply his general approach to one aspect of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, often considered one of the most 'baffling' in the world. His analysis criticizes the idea that internationalism provides a neutral and rational perspective, and that it, in that sense, radically differs from nationalism. Just as there are various forms or conceptions of the universality of international authority, so are there competing conceptions of its rationality. He focuses on three attitudes, three different forms of reason, that characterize international lawyers and policymakers dealing with nationalism. The author prefers to speak of a "dedoublement passionnel" of their internationalist and nationalist longings. He says that, the fantasy of such a policy proposer "dedouble" is that there is a way we can be both believers in cosmopolitan peace and yet remain who we are: passionate, partisan nationalists. Keywords:dedoublement passionnel; Israeli-Palestinian; partisan nationalists
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
At the Intersection of Due Process and Equal Protection: Expanding the Range of Protected Interests Easing ‘The Burden of the Brutalized’: Applying Bystander Intervention Training to Corporate Conduct Partisan Gerrymandering and the Illusion of Unfairness Oversight of Oversight: A Proposal for More Effective FOIA Reform Fulfilling the Promise of Roe: A Pathway for Meaningful Pre-Abortion Consultation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1