改革联合国和平行动:高级别小组的报告会对人权产生影响吗?

Q4 Social Sciences Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2016-12-08 DOI:10.1163/18754112-02001002
Jeni Whalan
{"title":"改革联合国和平行动:高级别小组的报告会对人权产生影响吗?","authors":"Jeni Whalan","doi":"10.1163/18754112-02001002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2015, the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Peace Operations (HIPPO) handed down more than 100 recommendations for making peace missions more effective. Following in the tradition of the Brahimi Report (2000) and An Agenda for Peace (1992), the HIPPO report is the latest attempt to grapple with the escalating, and often competing, demands made of UN peace operations. This article assesses the prospects of HIPPO’s recommendations, identifying their likely impact, and where they will likely fall short.","PeriodicalId":38927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18754112-02001002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming UN peace operations: Will the high-level panel’s report make a difference for human rights?\",\"authors\":\"Jeni Whalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18754112-02001002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In June 2015, the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Peace Operations (HIPPO) handed down more than 100 recommendations for making peace missions more effective. Following in the tradition of the Brahimi Report (2000) and An Agenda for Peace (1992), the HIPPO report is the latest attempt to grapple with the escalating, and often competing, demands made of UN peace operations. This article assesses the prospects of HIPPO’s recommendations, identifying their likely impact, and where they will likely fall short.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Peacekeeping\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18754112-02001002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Peacekeeping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-02001002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-02001002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年6月,联合国秘书长和平行动问题高级别小组(HIPPO)提出了100多项提高和平特派团效率的建议。继卜拉希米报告(2000年)和和平议程(1992年)的传统之后,HIPPO报告是应对联合国和平行动不断升级且经常相互竞争的要求的最新尝试。本文评估了HIPPO建议的前景,确定了它们可能的影响,以及它们可能不足的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reforming UN peace operations: Will the high-level panel’s report make a difference for human rights?
In June 2015, the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Peace Operations (HIPPO) handed down more than 100 recommendations for making peace missions more effective. Following in the tradition of the Brahimi Report (2000) and An Agenda for Peace (1992), the HIPPO report is the latest attempt to grapple with the escalating, and often competing, demands made of UN peace operations. This article assesses the prospects of HIPPO’s recommendations, identifying their likely impact, and where they will likely fall short.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Peacekeeping
Journal of International Peacekeeping Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Safeguarding Freedom of Religion or Belief to Prevent Conflicts and Mass Atrocities in Southeast Asia: the Role of Parliamentarians The Civil Society-Military Interface in the Protection of Civilians: the Bangsamoro Case Re-imagining asean and the Quest for Peace: Challenges and Prospects for Peacebuilding, Conflict Prevention, and Atrocities Prevention Conflict Management and Atrocity Prevention in Southeast Asia: Making asean “Fit for Purpose” Responding to Atrocities in Myanmar after the February 2021 Coup: Options for asean beyond Normative and Structural Constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1