与性骚扰有关的服装和归因

Kim K. P. Johnson, Jane E. Workman
{"title":"与性骚扰有关的服装和归因","authors":"Kim K. P. Johnson,&nbsp;Jane E. Workman","doi":"10.1177/1077727X9202100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article investigates the effect of provocativeness of clothing and sex of subject on attributions concerning provoking sexual harassment and likelihood of being sexually harassed. A convenience sample of 200 students (98 males, 102 females) was used in the study's 2 (Provocative vs. Nonprovocative clothing) × 2 (Sex of Subject) between-subjects design. The clothing variable was manipulated through the use of photographs. Subjects' attributions concerning the likelihood that the model would provoke sexual harassment were measured by an 8-item scale; the likelihood that the model would be the target of sexual harassment was measured by a single item: How likely is this person to be sexually harassed? Multivariate analysis of variance, analyses of variance, and the Student-Newman-Keuls test were used to analyze the data. Results revealed that subjects rated the model in provocative clothing as more likely to provoke sexual harassment and to be sexually harassed than the model wearing nonprovocative clothing.</p>","PeriodicalId":100610,"journal":{"name":"Home Economics Research Journal","volume":"21 2","pages":"160-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1077727X9202100202","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clothing and Attributions Concerning Sexual Harassment\",\"authors\":\"Kim K. P. Johnson,&nbsp;Jane E. Workman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1077727X9202100202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article investigates the effect of provocativeness of clothing and sex of subject on attributions concerning provoking sexual harassment and likelihood of being sexually harassed. A convenience sample of 200 students (98 males, 102 females) was used in the study's 2 (Provocative vs. Nonprovocative clothing) × 2 (Sex of Subject) between-subjects design. The clothing variable was manipulated through the use of photographs. Subjects' attributions concerning the likelihood that the model would provoke sexual harassment were measured by an 8-item scale; the likelihood that the model would be the target of sexual harassment was measured by a single item: How likely is this person to be sexually harassed? Multivariate analysis of variance, analyses of variance, and the Student-Newman-Keuls test were used to analyze the data. Results revealed that subjects rated the model in provocative clothing as more likely to provoke sexual harassment and to be sexually harassed than the model wearing nonprovocative clothing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Home Economics Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"160-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1077727X9202100202\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Home Economics Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1177/1077727X9202100202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1177/1077727X9202100202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

本文调查了服装的挑逗性和受试者的性别对引发性骚扰的归因和被性骚扰的可能性的影响。200名学生(98名男性,102名女性)的方便样本被用于研究的2(挑衅性与非挑衅性服装)× 2(受试者性别)受试者之间的设计。服装变量是通过使用照片来操纵的。采用8项量表测量被试对模型引发性骚扰可能性的归因;这个模型成为性骚扰目标的可能性是通过一个单项来衡量的:这个人被性骚扰的可能性有多大?采用多元方差分析、方差分析和Student-Newman-Keuls检验对数据进行分析。结果显示,受试者认为穿着挑逗性服装的模特比穿着非挑逗性服装的模特更容易引发性骚扰,也更容易受到性骚扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clothing and Attributions Concerning Sexual Harassment

This article investigates the effect of provocativeness of clothing and sex of subject on attributions concerning provoking sexual harassment and likelihood of being sexually harassed. A convenience sample of 200 students (98 males, 102 females) was used in the study's 2 (Provocative vs. Nonprovocative clothing) × 2 (Sex of Subject) between-subjects design. The clothing variable was manipulated through the use of photographs. Subjects' attributions concerning the likelihood that the model would provoke sexual harassment were measured by an 8-item scale; the likelihood that the model would be the target of sexual harassment was measured by a single item: How likely is this person to be sexually harassed? Multivariate analysis of variance, analyses of variance, and the Student-Newman-Keuls test were used to analyze the data. Results revealed that subjects rated the model in provocative clothing as more likely to provoke sexual harassment and to be sexually harassed than the model wearing nonprovocative clothing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS VISUAL PENCAIRAN GLETSER PADA BIDANG FASHION PERUBAHAN DESAIN MOTIF SULAMAN BENANG EMAS PADA BUSANA PENGANTIN WANITA DI SUNGAYANG KABUPATEN TANAH DATAR SPRING ROLL TOM YUM TOFU SEBAGAI INOVASI ONE DISH MEAL SEHAT PERKEMBANGAN RIAS DAN BUSANA PENGANTIN GAYA YOGYAKARTA PADA MASYARAKAT JOGJA TAHUN 2015-2021 PERKEMBANGAN TATA RIAS PAES PENGANTIN JOGJA PUTRI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1