国家产妇审查的快速解决和补救方案模式:与其他国际补偿方案的比较

S. Macleod
{"title":"国家产妇审查的快速解决和补救方案模式:与其他国际补偿方案的比较","authors":"S. Macleod","doi":"10.1177/1356262216678350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Maternity Review has proposed an insurance-based Rapid Resolution and Redress scheme be considered by the Department of Health. This article will outline and examine the Maternity Review’s proposals; drawing parallels and highlighting contrasts between the proposals and other schemes.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"22 1","pages":"61 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216678350","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The National Maternity Review’s Rapid Resolution and Redress scheme model: A comparison with other worldwide compensation schemes\",\"authors\":\"S. Macleod\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262216678350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The National Maternity Review has proposed an insurance-based Rapid Resolution and Redress scheme be considered by the Department of Health. This article will outline and examine the Maternity Review’s proposals; drawing parallels and highlighting contrasts between the proposals and other schemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"61 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216678350\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216678350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216678350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《全国产妇审查》提出了一项以保险为基础的快速解决和补救计划,卫生部将予以考虑。本文将概述和审查《产妇审查》的建议;在提案和其他方案之间绘制相似之处并突出对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The National Maternity Review’s Rapid Resolution and Redress scheme model: A comparison with other worldwide compensation schemes
The National Maternity Review has proposed an insurance-based Rapid Resolution and Redress scheme be considered by the Department of Health. This article will outline and examine the Maternity Review’s proposals; drawing parallels and highlighting contrasts between the proposals and other schemes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1