弥合大学和国家卫生服务伦理审查之间的差距

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI:10.1177/0144739412458269
Jeremy M. Brown, S. Agius
{"title":"弥合大学和国家卫生服务伦理审查之间的差距","authors":"Jeremy M. Brown, S. Agius","doi":"10.1177/0144739412458269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to identify the procedural gaps around research governance that can create unnecessary barriers to health services, workforce and education research in Universities and NHS. Difficulties lie with research governance process rather than the guiding ethical principles to which different professionals adhere. University research ethics review procedures should work more collaboratively with professional organisations own research governance processes. Up-to-date training across organisations for researchers working within the NHS to enable them to navigate these increasingly labyrinthine arrangements.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739412458269","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the gap between university and the National Health Service ethical scrutiny\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy M. Brown, S. Agius\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0144739412458269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper attempts to identify the procedural gaps around research governance that can create unnecessary barriers to health services, workforce and education research in Universities and NHS. Difficulties lie with research governance process rather than the guiding ethical principles to which different professionals adhere. University research ethics review procedures should work more collaboratively with professional organisations own research governance processes. Up-to-date training across organisations for researchers working within the NHS to enable them to navigate these increasingly labyrinthine arrangements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739412458269\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739412458269\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739412458269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文试图确定围绕研究治理的程序差距,这些差距可能对大学和NHS的卫生服务、劳动力和教育研究造成不必要的障碍。困难在于研究治理过程,而不是不同专业人员所遵循的指导道德原则。大学研究伦理审查程序应该与专业组织自己的研究治理过程更加协作。为在NHS内工作的研究人员提供跨组织的最新培训,使他们能够驾驭这些日益复杂的安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging the gap between university and the National Health Service ethical scrutiny
This paper attempts to identify the procedural gaps around research governance that can create unnecessary barriers to health services, workforce and education research in Universities and NHS. Difficulties lie with research governance process rather than the guiding ethical principles to which different professionals adhere. University research ethics review procedures should work more collaboratively with professional organisations own research governance processes. Up-to-date training across organisations for researchers working within the NHS to enable them to navigate these increasingly labyrinthine arrangements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1