{"title":"企业霸权","authors":"J. Klaehn","doi":"10.1177/174804850206400401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study asks whether the news coverage accorded the near-genocide in East Timor by the Globe and Mail(G&M) followed the predictions of the ‘propaganda model’ (PM) of media operations laid out and applied by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky in Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.The research asks whether the G&M's news coverage of the near-genocide in East Timor and of Canada's ‘aiding and abetting’ of ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ in occupied East Timor was hegemonic or ideologically serviceable given Canada's (geo)political-economic interests in Indonesia throughout the invasion and occupation periods. Did the news coverage provide a political and historical benchmark by which to inform the Canadian public (or not) and influence (or not) Canadian government policy on Indonesia and East Timor?","PeriodicalId":84790,"journal":{"name":"Gazette","volume":"64 1","pages":"301 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/174804850206400401","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Hegemony\",\"authors\":\"J. Klaehn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/174804850206400401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study asks whether the news coverage accorded the near-genocide in East Timor by the Globe and Mail(G&M) followed the predictions of the ‘propaganda model’ (PM) of media operations laid out and applied by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky in Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.The research asks whether the G&M's news coverage of the near-genocide in East Timor and of Canada's ‘aiding and abetting’ of ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ in occupied East Timor was hegemonic or ideologically serviceable given Canada's (geo)political-economic interests in Indonesia throughout the invasion and occupation periods. Did the news coverage provide a political and historical benchmark by which to inform the Canadian public (or not) and influence (or not) Canadian government policy on Indonesia and East Timor?\",\"PeriodicalId\":84790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gazette\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"301 - 321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/174804850206400401\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gazette\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/174804850206400401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/174804850206400401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
摘要
该研究询问，《环球邮报》(G&M)关于东帝汶近乎种族灭绝的新闻报道，是否遵循了爱德华·s·赫尔曼(Edward S. Herman)和诺姆·乔姆斯基(Noam Chomsky)在《制造同意:大众传媒的政治经济学》(Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of The Mass media)中提出并应用的媒体运作“宣传模式”(propaganda model, PM)的预测。该研究提出，考虑到加拿大在入侵和占领期间在印尼的地缘政治经济利益，G&M对东帝汶近乎种族灭绝和加拿大在被占领的东帝汶“协助和教唆”“战争罪”和“反人类罪”的新闻报道是否具有霸权主义或意识形态上的服务。新闻报道是否提供了一个政治和历史基准，以告知加拿大公众(或不)并影响(或不)加拿大政府对印度尼西亚和东帝汶的政策?
The study asks whether the news coverage accorded the near-genocide in East Timor by the Globe and Mail(G&M) followed the predictions of the ‘propaganda model’ (PM) of media operations laid out and applied by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky in Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.The research asks whether the G&M's news coverage of the near-genocide in East Timor and of Canada's ‘aiding and abetting’ of ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ in occupied East Timor was hegemonic or ideologically serviceable given Canada's (geo)political-economic interests in Indonesia throughout the invasion and occupation periods. Did the news coverage provide a political and historical benchmark by which to inform the Canadian public (or not) and influence (or not) Canadian government policy on Indonesia and East Timor?
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
