腓骨切缝是评估关节联合稳定性的可靠标志吗?形态计量学研究的系统综述。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Specialist Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1938640016685152
Akilesh Anand Prakash
{"title":"腓骨切缝是评估关节联合稳定性的可靠标志吗?形态计量学研究的系统综述。","authors":"Akilesh Anand Prakash","doi":"10.1177/1938640016685152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Incisura fibularis (IF) is an important landmark in assessing syndesmotic stability radiologically postinjury. The purpose of this review was to explore the anatomy and morphometrics of this widely used anatomical landmark and to further the understanding of the same. A systematic review was conducted online using PubMed and Google Scholar, per PRISMA guidelines. Predefined eligibility criteria were applied, and the data thus compiled were analyzed. Wide variability in morphometrics and, thus, anatomy of IF were observed in the present review, which was influenced by gender. There was no side-to-side variability seen in this study. The study stresses the need to consider the anatomical and gender-based variability while assessing syndesmotic stability and further supports the recommendation of side-to-side comparison. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Anatomical, Level V.","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":"10 1","pages":"246-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016685152","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Incisura Fibularis a Reliable Landmark for Assessing Syndesmotic Stability? A Systematic Review of Morphometric Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Akilesh Anand Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1938640016685152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Incisura fibularis (IF) is an important landmark in assessing syndesmotic stability radiologically postinjury. The purpose of this review was to explore the anatomy and morphometrics of this widely used anatomical landmark and to further the understanding of the same. A systematic review was conducted online using PubMed and Google Scholar, per PRISMA guidelines. Predefined eligibility criteria were applied, and the data thus compiled were analyzed. Wide variability in morphometrics and, thus, anatomy of IF were observed in the present review, which was influenced by gender. There was no side-to-side variability seen in this study. The study stresses the need to consider the anatomical and gender-based variability while assessing syndesmotic stability and further supports the recommendation of side-to-side comparison. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Anatomical, Level V.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"246-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016685152\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016685152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016685152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

腓骨缝骨(IF)是损伤后影像学评估韧带联合稳定性的重要标志。本综述的目的是探讨这个广泛使用的解剖标志的解剖学和形态计量学,并进一步了解它。根据PRISMA指南,使用PubMed和谷歌Scholar在线进行系统评价。采用预先确定的资格标准,并对编制的数据进行分析。在本综述中,观察到IF的形态计量学和解剖学上的广泛差异,这受到性别的影响。在这项研究中没有发现侧对侧的可变性。该研究强调在评估关节联合稳定性时需要考虑解剖学和性别差异,并进一步支持侧对侧比较的建议。证据等级:解剖,V级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Incisura Fibularis a Reliable Landmark for Assessing Syndesmotic Stability? A Systematic Review of Morphometric Studies.
: Incisura fibularis (IF) is an important landmark in assessing syndesmotic stability radiologically postinjury. The purpose of this review was to explore the anatomy and morphometrics of this widely used anatomical landmark and to further the understanding of the same. A systematic review was conducted online using PubMed and Google Scholar, per PRISMA guidelines. Predefined eligibility criteria were applied, and the data thus compiled were analyzed. Wide variability in morphometrics and, thus, anatomy of IF were observed in the present review, which was influenced by gender. There was no side-to-side variability seen in this study. The study stresses the need to consider the anatomical and gender-based variability while assessing syndesmotic stability and further supports the recommendation of side-to-side comparison. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Anatomical, Level V.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Specialist Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
Are SER-II Ankle Fractures Anatomic? Computed Tomography Demonstrates Mortise Malalignment in the Setting of Apparently Normal Radiographs. Sleep Apnea and Postoperative Medical Complications and Health Care Expenditures Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures. Anterior Capsule Reconstruction in the Setting of PVNS. Management of Giant Cell Tumor of Talus With Extended Intralesional Curettage and Reconstruction Using Polymethylmethacrylate Cement. Regional Anesthesia Decreases Inpatient But Not Outpatient Opioid Demand in Ankle and Distal Tibia Fracture Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1