现成的还是量身定做的?1924年创建大布里斯班的想法来源

J. Minnery
{"title":"现成的还是量身定做的?1924年创建大布里斯班的想法来源","authors":"J. Minnery","doi":"10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The literature on city planning and city administration is replete with examples of the international and inter-urban transfer of ideas. The transfer can result from qualitative emulation of one city by another or from the more generalized international circulation of expertise. But insufficient attention is paid to both the possibility of indigenous creation of local solutions to what are seen as local problems, even if triggered by international examples, and to the question of why the same circulating ideas take root in one place but not in another. This paper uses the “greaterization” of the City of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia in 1924 by a reformist Labor Party government as a case study to explore the sources of the ideas. The paper also compares the successful “greaterization” in Brisbane with the unsuccessful efforts in other Australian capital cities.","PeriodicalId":37727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Regional and Local History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000018","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off the Shelf or Tailor-made? Sources of Ideas for the Creation of Greater Brisbane in 1924\",\"authors\":\"J. Minnery\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The literature on city planning and city administration is replete with examples of the international and inter-urban transfer of ideas. The transfer can result from qualitative emulation of one city by another or from the more generalized international circulation of expertise. But insufficient attention is paid to both the possibility of indigenous creation of local solutions to what are seen as local problems, even if triggered by international examples, and to the question of why the same circulating ideas take root in one place but not in another. This paper uses the “greaterization” of the City of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia in 1924 by a reformist Labor Party government as a case study to explore the sources of the ideas. The paper also compares the successful “greaterization” in Brisbane with the unsuccessful efforts in other Australian capital cities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Regional and Local History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000018\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Regional and Local History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Regional and Local History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

关于城市规划和城市管理的文献中充满了国际和城市间思想转移的例子。这种转移可能源于一个城市对另一个城市的质量模仿,也可能源于更广泛的国际专业知识流通。但是,对于那些被视为地方问题的地方问题,即使是由国际例子引发的,土著创造地方解决方案的可能性,以及为什么同样的流通思想在一个地方扎根而在另一个地方却没有扎根的问题,人们没有给予足够的重视。本文以1924年改革派工党政府对澳大利亚昆士兰州布里斯班市进行的“大型化”为例,探讨“大型化”思想的来源。本文还比较了布里斯班成功的“大型化”与澳大利亚其他首府城市的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Off the Shelf or Tailor-made? Sources of Ideas for the Creation of Greater Brisbane in 1924
Abstract The literature on city planning and city administration is replete with examples of the international and inter-urban transfer of ideas. The transfer can result from qualitative emulation of one city by another or from the more generalized international circulation of expertise. But insufficient attention is paid to both the possibility of indigenous creation of local solutions to what are seen as local problems, even if triggered by international examples, and to the question of why the same circulating ideas take root in one place but not in another. This paper uses the “greaterization” of the City of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia in 1924 by a reformist Labor Party government as a case study to explore the sources of the ideas. The paper also compares the successful “greaterization” in Brisbane with the unsuccessful efforts in other Australian capital cities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Regional and Local History aims to publish high-quality academic articles which address the history of regions and localities in the medieval, early-modern and modern eras. Regional and local are defined in broad terms, encouraging their examination in both urban and rural contexts, and as administrative, cultural and geographical entities. Regional histories may transcend both local and national boundaries, and offer a means of interrogating the temporality of such structures. Such histories might broaden understandings arrived at through a national focus or help develop agendas for future exploration. The subject matter of regional and local histories invites a number of methodological approaches including oral history, comparative history, cultural history and history from below. We welcome contributions situated in these methodological frameworks but are also keen to elicit inter-disciplinary work which seeks to understand the history of regions or localities through the methodologies of geography, sociology or cultural studies. The journal also publishes book reviews and review articles on themes relating to regional or local history.
期刊最新文献
Reciprocity and Political Authority: An Early State in South India Beyond Trawlertown: memory, life and legacy in the wake of the Cod Wars “In Roars of Laughter” and “Moved to Tears” Performing the Work of Lancashire and Yorkshire Dialect Writers, c. 1850–1915 Mid-Nineteenth-Century Population Movement in the Anglo-Scottish Border Region The Orchards of Eastern England: history, ecology and place
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1