大提琴尾针长度设置三种教学方法之比较

Q1 Arts and Humanities String Research Journal Pub Date : 2015-07-01 DOI:10.1177/194849921500600002
Rebecca L. Tast
{"title":"大提琴尾针长度设置三种教学方法之比较","authors":"Rebecca L. Tast","doi":"10.1177/194849921500600002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this two-part study I compared the endpin lengths and resulting cello setups produced by the Scroll to Nose Method, the Hand Span Method, and the Drop Method, and asked if height or gender affect endpin length. The endpin lengths produced by the three pedagogical methods were compared in part one. Participants (N=62) consisted of a convenience sample of adult volunteer students and faculty from a large comprehensive university school of music in the Midwest. Endpin lengths produced by the Scroll to Nose Method and the Drop Method were significantly longer than those produced by the Hand Span Method. There was also a significant interaction between pedagogical method and height. In part two I compared the cello setups resulting from the use of the three pedagogical methods. Participants (N=93) were string teachers responding to an online survey. Participants were asked to select pairs of pictures that, in their opinion, showed the best cello setup. Responses indicated an even split in the overall choice of the Scroll to Nose Method and the Drop Method.","PeriodicalId":36814,"journal":{"name":"String Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/194849921500600002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Three Pedagogical Methods for Setting Cello Endpin Length\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L. Tast\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/194849921500600002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this two-part study I compared the endpin lengths and resulting cello setups produced by the Scroll to Nose Method, the Hand Span Method, and the Drop Method, and asked if height or gender affect endpin length. The endpin lengths produced by the three pedagogical methods were compared in part one. Participants (N=62) consisted of a convenience sample of adult volunteer students and faculty from a large comprehensive university school of music in the Midwest. Endpin lengths produced by the Scroll to Nose Method and the Drop Method were significantly longer than those produced by the Hand Span Method. There was also a significant interaction between pedagogical method and height. In part two I compared the cello setups resulting from the use of the three pedagogical methods. Participants (N=93) were string teachers responding to an online survey. Participants were asked to select pairs of pictures that, in their opinion, showed the best cello setup. Responses indicated an even split in the overall choice of the Scroll to Nose Method and the Drop Method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"String Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/194849921500600002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"String Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/194849921500600002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"String Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/194849921500600002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这个由两部分组成的研究中,我比较了端针长度和由滚动法、手跨法和滴法产生的大提琴设置,并询问身高或性别是否影响端针长度。第一部分比较了三种教学方法产生的端针长度。参与者(N=62)由来自中西部一所大型综合性大学音乐学院的成人志愿者学生和教师组成。滚动到鼻子法和滴法产生的端销长度明显长于手跨度法产生的端销长度。教学方法与身高之间也存在显著的相互作用。在第二部分中,我比较了使用三种教学方法所产生的大提琴设置。参与者(N=93)是参与在线调查的教师。参与者被要求选择他们认为最好的大提琴组合。回答表明,在滚动到鼻子方法和掉落方法的总体选择中,有一个均匀的分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Three Pedagogical Methods for Setting Cello Endpin Length
In this two-part study I compared the endpin lengths and resulting cello setups produced by the Scroll to Nose Method, the Hand Span Method, and the Drop Method, and asked if height or gender affect endpin length. The endpin lengths produced by the three pedagogical methods were compared in part one. Participants (N=62) consisted of a convenience sample of adult volunteer students and faculty from a large comprehensive university school of music in the Midwest. Endpin lengths produced by the Scroll to Nose Method and the Drop Method were significantly longer than those produced by the Hand Span Method. There was also a significant interaction between pedagogical method and height. In part two I compared the cello setups resulting from the use of the three pedagogical methods. Participants (N=93) were string teachers responding to an online survey. Participants were asked to select pairs of pictures that, in their opinion, showed the best cello setup. Responses indicated an even split in the overall choice of the Scroll to Nose Method and the Drop Method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
String Research Journal
String Research Journal Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
String Teachers on the Challenges of Intonation: A Report From Sweden Using Storytelling to Enrich Expressiveness Among Young String Players Fire on the Bayou: The Status of School Orchestra and String Programs in Louisiana An Analysis of Double Bass Vibrato A Content Analysis of Doctoral Research in String Education, 1992–2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1