通过行动研究共同创造组织福利:来自社会合作社案例的见解

IF 1.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Action Research Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1177/14767503231183876
Diletta Gazzaroli, Chiara Corvino, Chiara D’Angelo
{"title":"通过行动研究共同创造组织福利:来自社会合作社案例的见解","authors":"Diletta Gazzaroli, Chiara Corvino, Chiara D’Angelo","doi":"10.1177/14767503231183876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on co-creation theory, the value of any human resource (HR) practice is defined by any stakeholder who uses it; hence, to maximize its value, HR practices should be co-created by HR and users. However, when it comes to organizational welfare, in most of the cases, decision-makers rely on standardized processes and workers are involved mainly in terms of needs-analysis through standardized tools resulting in less incisive choices and policies. The current work takes on the challenge to apply action-research (AR) in the field of organizational welfare and show how AR can be used as a valuable methodological approach to sustain the co-creation of more relevant organizational welfare choices. We worked in collaboration with an Italian social cooperative with the purpose to adjust its representations and practices around organizational welfare through organizational actors’ participation. Results showed that AR allowed a complex welfare picture to be built, supporting awareness around several priorities from the bottom that would have otherwise remained invisible: the need to define an operational direction and the identification of a dedicated role to coordinate the process; development of a context-based welfare-need questionnaire. Our findings support the contribution of AR to the co-creation process of more effective HR practices.","PeriodicalId":46969,"journal":{"name":"Action Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creating organizational welfare through action-research: Insights from the case of a social cooperative\",\"authors\":\"Diletta Gazzaroli, Chiara Corvino, Chiara D’Angelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14767503231183876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on co-creation theory, the value of any human resource (HR) practice is defined by any stakeholder who uses it; hence, to maximize its value, HR practices should be co-created by HR and users. However, when it comes to organizational welfare, in most of the cases, decision-makers rely on standardized processes and workers are involved mainly in terms of needs-analysis through standardized tools resulting in less incisive choices and policies. The current work takes on the challenge to apply action-research (AR) in the field of organizational welfare and show how AR can be used as a valuable methodological approach to sustain the co-creation of more relevant organizational welfare choices. We worked in collaboration with an Italian social cooperative with the purpose to adjust its representations and practices around organizational welfare through organizational actors’ participation. Results showed that AR allowed a complex welfare picture to be built, supporting awareness around several priorities from the bottom that would have otherwise remained invisible: the need to define an operational direction and the identification of a dedicated role to coordinate the process; development of a context-based welfare-need questionnaire. Our findings support the contribution of AR to the co-creation process of more effective HR practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231183876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231183876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于共同创造理论,任何人力资源实践的价值都是由任何使用它的利益相关者来定义的;因此,为了使其价值最大化,人力资源实践应该由人力资源和用户共同创造。然而,当涉及到组织福利时,在大多数情况下,决策者依赖于标准化的流程,工人主要通过标准化工具参与需求分析,导致选择和政策不那么敏锐。当前的工作面临的挑战是将行动研究(AR)应用于组织福利领域,并展示如何将行动研究作为一种有价值的方法方法来维持更相关的组织福利选择的共同创造。我们与一家意大利社会合作社合作,目的是通过组织行动者的参与,调整其在组织福利方面的表现和做法。结果表明,增强现实允许建立一个复杂的福利图景,支持从底层对几个优先事项的认识,否则这些优先事项将是不可见的:需要确定一个操作方向和确定一个专门的角色来协调这一过程;编制基于情境的福利需要问卷。我们的研究结果支持AR对更有效的人力资源实践共同创造过程的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-creating organizational welfare through action-research: Insights from the case of a social cooperative
Based on co-creation theory, the value of any human resource (HR) practice is defined by any stakeholder who uses it; hence, to maximize its value, HR practices should be co-created by HR and users. However, when it comes to organizational welfare, in most of the cases, decision-makers rely on standardized processes and workers are involved mainly in terms of needs-analysis through standardized tools resulting in less incisive choices and policies. The current work takes on the challenge to apply action-research (AR) in the field of organizational welfare and show how AR can be used as a valuable methodological approach to sustain the co-creation of more relevant organizational welfare choices. We worked in collaboration with an Italian social cooperative with the purpose to adjust its representations and practices around organizational welfare through organizational actors’ participation. Results showed that AR allowed a complex welfare picture to be built, supporting awareness around several priorities from the bottom that would have otherwise remained invisible: the need to define an operational direction and the identification of a dedicated role to coordinate the process; development of a context-based welfare-need questionnaire. Our findings support the contribution of AR to the co-creation process of more effective HR practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action Research
Action Research Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Action Research is a new international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal which is a forum for the development of the theory and practice of action research. Our purpose with this international, peer reviewed journal is to offer a forum for participative, action oriented inquiry into questions that matter--questions relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, that enable them to flourish in their organizations and communities, and that evince a deep concern for the wider ecology. The aim of the journal is to offer a viable alternative to dominant "disinterested" models of social science, one that is relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, their organizations and their communities.
期刊最新文献
Participatory action research: A tool to develop occupational health and safety education for new immigrant workers Benefits of reflection-based monitoring in action research projects Towards right to work: A reflexive analysis on an action research Revisiting an historic tool of participatory action research: Consciousness-raising as a methodology for transformative change How to (mis)align participatory approaches with the everyday life? Construction of an improved cookstove in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1