制度缺陷

James Kirby
{"title":"制度缺陷","authors":"James Kirby","doi":"10.1215/9780822371618-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comments on the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Chambers (William) on whether a defendant who pleaded guilty to storing smuggled tobacco was not liable for the unpaid excise duty on importation and therefore the court had no jurisdiction to make a confiscation order. Criticises the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office for relying on out-of-date legislation and the Office of Public Sector Information for failing to keep its website up to date. Considers the difficulties for the courts when they seek online statutory law.","PeriodicalId":83199,"journal":{"name":"The New law journal","volume":"159 1","pages":"649-649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flaws in the system\",\"authors\":\"James Kirby\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/9780822371618-127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comments on the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Chambers (William) on whether a defendant who pleaded guilty to storing smuggled tobacco was not liable for the unpaid excise duty on importation and therefore the court had no jurisdiction to make a confiscation order. Criticises the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office for relying on out-of-date legislation and the Office of Public Sector Information for failing to keep its website up to date. Considers the difficulties for the courts when they seek online statutory law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The New law journal\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"649-649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The New law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371618-127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371618-127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

就上诉法院在R. v . Chambers (William)一案中就被告认罪后是否对未付的进口烟草消费税不承担法律责任,因而法院无权发出没收令的判决发表评论。批评英国税收和海关检察署依赖过时的立法,批评英国公共部门信息办公室未能及时更新其网站。考虑法院在网上寻求成文法时的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flaws in the system
Comments on the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Chambers (William) on whether a defendant who pleaded guilty to storing smuggled tobacco was not liable for the unpaid excise duty on importation and therefore the court had no jurisdiction to make a confiscation order. Criticises the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office for relying on out-of-date legislation and the Office of Public Sector Information for failing to keep its website up to date. Considers the difficulties for the courts when they seek online statutory law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flaws in the system Medical treatment--withdrawal of treatment--patient in persistent vegetative state: Airedale National Health Service Trust v Bland. Medical treatment--refusal of medical treatment--adult--refusal on religions grounds: Re S (refusal of medical treatment). Child--medical treatment--court's inherent jurisdiction--treatment contrary to clinical judgment: Re J (a minor)(medical treatment). The right to found a family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1