“我觉得我们真的落后于游戏”:英国亲密伴侣暴力支持部门对技术促进的虐待上升的看法

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Gender-Based Violence Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/239868021x16290304343529
L. Tanczer, Isabel Lopez-Neira, S. Parkin
{"title":"“我觉得我们真的落后于游戏”:英国亲密伴侣暴力支持部门对技术促进的虐待上升的看法","authors":"L. Tanczer, Isabel Lopez-Neira, S. Parkin","doi":"10.1332/239868021x16290304343529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology-facilitated abuse or ‘tech abuse’ in intimate partner violence (IPV) contexts describes the breadth of harms that can be enacted using digital systems and online tools. While the misappropriation of technologies in the context of IPV has been subject to prior research, a dedicated study on the United Kingdom’s IPV support sector has so far been missing. The present analysis summarises insights derived from semi-structured interviews with 34 UK voluntary and statutory sector representatives that were conducted over the course of two years (2018–2020). The analysis identifies four overarching themes that point out support services’ practices, concerns and challenges in relation to tech abuse, and specifically the Internet of Things (IoT). These themes include (a) technology-facilitated abuse, where interviewees outline their experiences and understanding of the concept of tech abuse; (b) IoT-enabled tech abuse, focusing on the changing dynamics of tech abuse due to the continuing rise of smart consumer products; (c) data, documentation and assessment, that directs our attention to the shortcomings of existing risk assessment and recording practices; and (d) training, support and assistance, in which participants point to the need for specialist support capabilities to be developed within and beyond existing services.Key messagesUK statutory and voluntary support services do not feel well equipped to respond to tech abuse.Shortcomings in documentation and assessment practices make it difficult to estimate the full scale and nature of tech abuse.Tech abuse training and other support mechanisms are needed to amplify the UK sector’s ability to assist IPV victims/survivors.","PeriodicalId":42166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘I feel like we’re really behind the game’: perspectives of the United Kingdom’s intimate partner violence support sector on the rise of technology-facilitated abuse\",\"authors\":\"L. Tanczer, Isabel Lopez-Neira, S. Parkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/239868021x16290304343529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technology-facilitated abuse or ‘tech abuse’ in intimate partner violence (IPV) contexts describes the breadth of harms that can be enacted using digital systems and online tools. While the misappropriation of technologies in the context of IPV has been subject to prior research, a dedicated study on the United Kingdom’s IPV support sector has so far been missing. The present analysis summarises insights derived from semi-structured interviews with 34 UK voluntary and statutory sector representatives that were conducted over the course of two years (2018–2020). The analysis identifies four overarching themes that point out support services’ practices, concerns and challenges in relation to tech abuse, and specifically the Internet of Things (IoT). These themes include (a) technology-facilitated abuse, where interviewees outline their experiences and understanding of the concept of tech abuse; (b) IoT-enabled tech abuse, focusing on the changing dynamics of tech abuse due to the continuing rise of smart consumer products; (c) data, documentation and assessment, that directs our attention to the shortcomings of existing risk assessment and recording practices; and (d) training, support and assistance, in which participants point to the need for specialist support capabilities to be developed within and beyond existing services.Key messagesUK statutory and voluntary support services do not feel well equipped to respond to tech abuse.Shortcomings in documentation and assessment practices make it difficult to estimate the full scale and nature of tech abuse.Tech abuse training and other support mechanisms are needed to amplify the UK sector’s ability to assist IPV victims/survivors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gender-Based Violence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gender-Based Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021x16290304343529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021x16290304343529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)背景下,技术促进的虐待或“技术滥用”描述了使用数字系统和在线工具可能造成的广泛伤害。虽然在IPV方面对技术的滥用已经进行了事先研究,但迄今为止还没有对联合王国IPV支助部门进行专门研究。本分析总结了在两年(2018-2020年)期间对34名英国自愿和法定部门代表进行的半结构化访谈得出的见解。该分析确定了四个总体主题,指出了与技术滥用有关的支持服务的实践、关注和挑战,特别是物联网(IoT)。这些主题包括(a)技术促进的滥用,受访者概述他们的经历和对技术滥用概念的理解;(b)物联网技术滥用,重点关注由于智能消费产品的持续增长而导致的技术滥用动态变化;(c)数据、文件和评估,使我们注意到现有风险评估和记录做法的缺陷;(d)培训、支助和援助,与会者指出需要在现有服务内外发展专家支助能力。关键信息英国的法定和自愿支持服务机构没有做好应对技术滥用的准备。文档和评估实践的缺陷使得很难估计技术滥用的全部规模和性质。需要技术滥用培训和其他支持机制,以扩大英国部门帮助IPV受害者/幸存者的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘I feel like we’re really behind the game’: perspectives of the United Kingdom’s intimate partner violence support sector on the rise of technology-facilitated abuse
Technology-facilitated abuse or ‘tech abuse’ in intimate partner violence (IPV) contexts describes the breadth of harms that can be enacted using digital systems and online tools. While the misappropriation of technologies in the context of IPV has been subject to prior research, a dedicated study on the United Kingdom’s IPV support sector has so far been missing. The present analysis summarises insights derived from semi-structured interviews with 34 UK voluntary and statutory sector representatives that were conducted over the course of two years (2018–2020). The analysis identifies four overarching themes that point out support services’ practices, concerns and challenges in relation to tech abuse, and specifically the Internet of Things (IoT). These themes include (a) technology-facilitated abuse, where interviewees outline their experiences and understanding of the concept of tech abuse; (b) IoT-enabled tech abuse, focusing on the changing dynamics of tech abuse due to the continuing rise of smart consumer products; (c) data, documentation and assessment, that directs our attention to the shortcomings of existing risk assessment and recording practices; and (d) training, support and assistance, in which participants point to the need for specialist support capabilities to be developed within and beyond existing services.Key messagesUK statutory and voluntary support services do not feel well equipped to respond to tech abuse.Shortcomings in documentation and assessment practices make it difficult to estimate the full scale and nature of tech abuse.Tech abuse training and other support mechanisms are needed to amplify the UK sector’s ability to assist IPV victims/survivors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland ‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland Does a history with sexual assault impact bystander intervention engagement? An analysis of the risk factors for intimate partner sexual violence against women and girls in Mexico Resilience and agency in children living with domestic abuse: an alternative interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1