收养中的担保和依附

IF 1.4 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW Pub Date : 1997-09-02 DOI:10.1300/J002V25N03_03
K. Watson
{"title":"收养中的担保和依附","authors":"K. Watson","doi":"10.1300/J002V25N03_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY The meaning of the words “bonding” and “attachment” as terms related to human connections are examined from an historical perspective and as important tools in the field of adoption. For over three decades there has been confusion between the two words and about the processes which they represented. Because adoption, by definition, changes the usual patterns of family connections, it is especially important that there be common agreement about terminology. Clinical observations have led to the discrete definitions proposed here. The words are defined, for utilitarian purposes, in a way that underscores the qualitative differences. The result is a tool that can improve placement decisions, help resolve controversial custody cases, reduce tensions among the families to which an adopted child has connections, and provide concrete assistance to children in their efforts to learn how to make significant attachments.","PeriodicalId":51527,"journal":{"name":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J002V25N03_03","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bonding and Attachment in Adoption\",\"authors\":\"K. Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J002V25N03_03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY The meaning of the words “bonding” and “attachment” as terms related to human connections are examined from an historical perspective and as important tools in the field of adoption. For over three decades there has been confusion between the two words and about the processes which they represented. Because adoption, by definition, changes the usual patterns of family connections, it is especially important that there be common agreement about terminology. Clinical observations have led to the discrete definitions proposed here. The words are defined, for utilitarian purposes, in a way that underscores the qualitative differences. The result is a tool that can improve placement decisions, help resolve controversial custody cases, reduce tensions among the families to which an adopted child has connections, and provide concrete assistance to children in their efforts to learn how to make significant attachments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J002V25N03_03\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J002V25N03_03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J002V25N03_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

作为与人类关系相关的术语,“结合”和“依恋”的含义从历史的角度进行了研究,并作为收养领域的重要工具。30多年来,人们一直对这两个词之间的关系以及它们所代表的过程感到困惑。因为根据定义,收养改变了家庭关系的通常模式,所以在术语上达成一致是特别重要的。临床观察导致了这里提出的离散定义。为了实用主义的目的,这些词的定义强调了质量上的差异。其结果是一种工具,可以改善安置决策,帮助解决有争议的监护权案件,减少收养儿童的家庭之间的紧张关系,并为儿童学习如何建立重要的依恋提供具体的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bonding and Attachment in Adoption
SUMMARY The meaning of the words “bonding” and “attachment” as terms related to human connections are examined from an historical perspective and as important tools in the field of adoption. For over three decades there has been confusion between the two words and about the processes which they represented. Because adoption, by definition, changes the usual patterns of family connections, it is especially important that there be common agreement about terminology. Clinical observations have led to the discrete definitions proposed here. The words are defined, for utilitarian purposes, in a way that underscores the qualitative differences. The result is a tool that can improve placement decisions, help resolve controversial custody cases, reduce tensions among the families to which an adopted child has connections, and provide concrete assistance to children in their efforts to learn how to make significant attachments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Marriage & Family Review publishes a mix of open submission articles as well as thematic issues that bring together the most current research, practice, advances in theory development, and applications of knowledge on a particular topic in the field. Marriage & Family Review has historically welcomed open submissions from numerous international scholars and will continue to do so. The journal will continue to welcome manuscripts that concern family strengths and premarital relationship development. Another continued emphasis will be research-based manuscripts concerning controversial issues.
期刊最新文献
Ethnic Differences in the Effects of Five Disciplinary Techniques on Subsequent Externalizing Behavior Problems. "Best-Laid Plans": Barriers to Meeting Marital Timing Desires Over the Life Course. Rethinking and Revising Goode's Contribution to Global Family Change. Role of Marital Quality in Explaining Depressive Symptoms After Marital Termination Among Older Adults. Marriage Advantage in Subjective Well-Being: Causal Effect or Unmeasured Heterogeneity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1