在纳特龙湖开采纯碱:坦桑尼亚的收获还是毁灭?

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Electronic Commerce Research Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.12966/JECR.05.01.2014
R. Kadigi, K. Mwathe, Adam Dutton, J. Kashaigili, F. Kilima
{"title":"在纳特龙湖开采纯碱:坦桑尼亚的收获还是毁灭?","authors":"R. Kadigi, K. Mwathe, Adam Dutton, J. Kashaigili, F. Kilima","doi":"10.12966/JECR.05.01.2014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The XI/22 decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at its eleventh Conference of Parties invite parties to integrate the three objectives of the CBD into sustainable development and poverty eradication programs, plans, policies, and priority actions, taking into account the outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference. Based on this ground a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) of a proposed new development (establishment of soda ash facility) in the Lake Natron area in Tanzania was carried out to inform decision regarding the proposal. The costs and benefits of this project were compared with that of two other alternatives namely the ―Business as Usual‖ (BAU) and ―Sustainable Ecotourism‖ (SE). The results of analysis showed that at the present levels of soda ash prices and investment costs the benefits of ecosystem conservation outweigh the benefits of soda ash mining. We furthermore argue that Lake Natron is part of an important network of ecosystems and should not be viewed as a separate entity altogether. The Lake’s ecosystem needs to be managed wisely by introducing only livelihood initiatives or developments that are linked to the survival of wildlife which it supports, including the lesser flamingo. Sustainable ecotourism is one of such initiatives. Its benefits spill over beyond the local and national boundaries to beneficiaries at regional and international levels. We therefore underscore the needs for different stakeholders to share the costs of developing a sustainable eco-tourism industry in the Lake Natron ecosystem. This can be achieved through negotiations with regional and global partners for more resources.","PeriodicalId":47498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electronic Commerce Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soda ash mining in lake Natron: a reap or ruin for Tanzania?\",\"authors\":\"R. Kadigi, K. Mwathe, Adam Dutton, J. Kashaigili, F. Kilima\",\"doi\":\"10.12966/JECR.05.01.2014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The XI/22 decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at its eleventh Conference of Parties invite parties to integrate the three objectives of the CBD into sustainable development and poverty eradication programs, plans, policies, and priority actions, taking into account the outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference. Based on this ground a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) of a proposed new development (establishment of soda ash facility) in the Lake Natron area in Tanzania was carried out to inform decision regarding the proposal. The costs and benefits of this project were compared with that of two other alternatives namely the ―Business as Usual‖ (BAU) and ―Sustainable Ecotourism‖ (SE). The results of analysis showed that at the present levels of soda ash prices and investment costs the benefits of ecosystem conservation outweigh the benefits of soda ash mining. We furthermore argue that Lake Natron is part of an important network of ecosystems and should not be viewed as a separate entity altogether. The Lake’s ecosystem needs to be managed wisely by introducing only livelihood initiatives or developments that are linked to the survival of wildlife which it supports, including the lesser flamingo. Sustainable ecotourism is one of such initiatives. Its benefits spill over beyond the local and national boundaries to beneficiaries at regional and international levels. We therefore underscore the needs for different stakeholders to share the costs of developing a sustainable eco-tourism industry in the Lake Natron ecosystem. This can be achieved through negotiations with regional and global partners for more resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electronic Commerce Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electronic Commerce Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12966/JECR.05.01.2014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electronic Commerce Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12966/JECR.05.01.2014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

《生物多样性公约》第十一届缔约方大会第十一/二十二项决定邀请缔约方将《生物多样性公约》的三个目标纳入可持续发展和消除贫困的方案、计划、政策和优先行动,同时考虑到bbb +20大会的成果。在此基础上,对坦桑尼亚纳特龙湖地区拟议的新开发项目(建立纯碱设施)进行了成本效益分析(CBA),以便为有关该提议的决定提供信息。该项目的成本和效益与其他两种替代方案进行了比较,即“一切照旧”(BAU)和“可持续生态旅游”(SE)。分析结果表明,在目前的纯碱价格和投资成本水平下,保护生态系统的效益大于开采纯碱的效益。我们进一步认为,纳特龙湖是一个重要的生态系统网络的一部分,不应该被视为一个单独的实体。湖的生态系统需要明智地管理,只引入与它所支持的野生动物(包括小火烈鸟)的生存有关的生计倡议或发展。可持续生态旅游就是其中之一。它的好处超越地方和国家边界,惠及区域和国际各级的受益者。因此,我们强调需要不同利益相关者分担在纳特龙湖生态系统中发展可持续生态旅游业的成本。这可以通过与区域和全球伙伴谈判争取更多资源来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soda ash mining in lake Natron: a reap or ruin for Tanzania?
The XI/22 decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at its eleventh Conference of Parties invite parties to integrate the three objectives of the CBD into sustainable development and poverty eradication programs, plans, policies, and priority actions, taking into account the outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference. Based on this ground a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) of a proposed new development (establishment of soda ash facility) in the Lake Natron area in Tanzania was carried out to inform decision regarding the proposal. The costs and benefits of this project were compared with that of two other alternatives namely the ―Business as Usual‖ (BAU) and ―Sustainable Ecotourism‖ (SE). The results of analysis showed that at the present levels of soda ash prices and investment costs the benefits of ecosystem conservation outweigh the benefits of soda ash mining. We furthermore argue that Lake Natron is part of an important network of ecosystems and should not be viewed as a separate entity altogether. The Lake’s ecosystem needs to be managed wisely by introducing only livelihood initiatives or developments that are linked to the survival of wildlife which it supports, including the lesser flamingo. Sustainable ecotourism is one of such initiatives. Its benefits spill over beyond the local and national boundaries to beneficiaries at regional and international levels. We therefore underscore the needs for different stakeholders to share the costs of developing a sustainable eco-tourism industry in the Lake Natron ecosystem. This can be achieved through negotiations with regional and global partners for more resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Selling Power of Customer-Generated Product Reviews: the Matching Effect Between Consumers’ Cognitive Needs and Persuasive Message Types Disparities of Environmental Risk Factors Influence Heterogeneity of Malaria Prevalence in Uganda Analysis of the International Sustainable Building Rating Systems (SBRSs) for Sustainable Development with Special Focused on Green Building Index (GBI) Malaysia Soda ash mining in lake Natron: a reap or ruin for Tanzania? Environmental Degradation in Liberia: Challenges and Opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1