Scylla和Charybdis之间的负责任之路:理解气候变化损失和损害机制中对公平的诉求

Kenneth Shockley
{"title":"Scylla和Charybdis之间的负责任之路:理解气候变化损失和损害机制中对公平的诉求","authors":"Kenneth Shockley","doi":"10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shockley uses equity to assess the moral significance of loss and damage in any successor treaty to the Kyoto Protocol. He argues that we might conceptualize loss and damage either in terms of the costs associated with rectifying a past wrong, a backward-looking accountability approach, or in terms of balancing uncertain future burdens in the face of unknown harms, a forward-looking distributional approach. Shockley argues that the forward looking approach is more practicable, better able to address problems that have not yet arisen but will arise, and better able to integrate intuitive strengths of the backward-looking view. He argues that there is good reason to think of loss and damage in terms of the opportunities and prospects that may accompany a changing climate.","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Responsible Path between Scylla and Charybdis: Making Sense of Appeals to Equity in Climate Change Loss and Damage Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Shockley\",\"doi\":\"10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shockley uses equity to assess the moral significance of loss and damage in any successor treaty to the Kyoto Protocol. He argues that we might conceptualize loss and damage either in terms of the costs associated with rectifying a past wrong, a backward-looking accountability approach, or in terms of balancing uncertain future burdens in the face of unknown harms, a forward-looking distributional approach. Shockley argues that the forward looking approach is more practicable, better able to address problems that have not yet arisen but will arise, and better able to integrate intuitive strengths of the backward-looking view. He argues that there is good reason to think of loss and damage in terms of the opportunities and prospects that may accompany a changing climate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"22-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

肖克利用公平来评估《京都议定书》后续条约中损失和损害的道德意义。他认为,我们可以根据与纠正过去错误相关的成本(一种向后看的问责方法)或根据面对未知危害时平衡不确定的未来负担(一种前瞻性的分配方法)来概念化损失和损害。肖克利认为,前瞻性方法更可行,能够更好地解决尚未出现但将会出现的问题,并且能够更好地整合向后看观点的直觉优势。他认为,有充分的理由考虑气候变化可能带来的机遇和前景方面的损失和损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Responsible Path between Scylla and Charybdis: Making Sense of Appeals to Equity in Climate Change Loss and Damage Mechanisms
Shockley uses equity to assess the moral significance of loss and damage in any successor treaty to the Kyoto Protocol. He argues that we might conceptualize loss and damage either in terms of the costs associated with rectifying a past wrong, a backward-looking accountability approach, or in terms of balancing uncertain future burdens in the face of unknown harms, a forward-looking distributional approach. Shockley argues that the forward looking approach is more practicable, better able to address problems that have not yet arisen but will arise, and better able to integrate intuitive strengths of the backward-looking view. He argues that there is good reason to think of loss and damage in terms of the opportunities and prospects that may accompany a changing climate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Objectivity and Subjectivity in Theories of Well-Being Political Leadership and the Social Value of Privacy Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics Defining Scientific Integrity The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Repatriation of Refugees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1